agentleFS
tonydzitonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit/skills/comments/SKILL.md

comments

Skill6 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Work the comments under published posts in one pass: list unanswered ones, reply only where a reply is genuinely expected (at most three per pass), name top commenters as warm-DM candidates, and prepare reply drafts on approval. Triggers: "/comments", "unanswered comments", "who is commenting".

9 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use analytics.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • MicrosoftSkill

    analytics

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    RECALL the author: before every reply to a human: /find <name> (namesearch) + grep the vault + the Telegram profile (get_full_user by …

    line 38
  2. Distinctive:

    READ by default. Mass back-dated replying = a hard stop: batch only, and only with a "+".

    line 47

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/comments — comments under our content (show · reply · grow into a DM)

🧒 End the report to a non-technical owner with a short "In plain words" recap. (memory eli5-always)

One pass: show the comments and reply surgically where a reply is actually expected. It collects and displays; it sends replies only on the owner's explicit "+". A thin layer (AK-47) over the engines in $IMPORTS_ROOT/content-factory\registry\.

🔴 BATTLE LESSON 2026-07-15 (memory bulk-replies-cringe-one-offer-converts). The goal "zero unanswered" is CANCELLED: a batch of 16 replies to old comments was deleted by the owner in full ("my batch went out… I'm embarrassed myself"), comment auto-posting was turned off, and one of our accounts lost access to a third-party group. In the same night ONE public call-to-action post landed a partner within 30 hours. → Default = stay silent. Reply only if: it is addressed to us OR the thread is alive (younger than ~a week) OR a person is personally waiting for an answer. Older than that — skip, and that is NOT a debt. → Ceiling ≤3 replies per pass, never as a back-to-back series inside someone else's group: pace and volume read as a bot regardless of how good the text is. → Value is measured in people who moved, not in the unanswered counter.

Boundaries: this is about comments under OUR published posts (pubmetrics.db). The separate club corpus has its own skill (/sostav-comments). Facebook comments will be pulled in once the Graph token is live — for now the source is Telegram.

1. Fresh collection (0 tokens)

First refresh the database so you don't reply to stale material:

  • python tg_comments_collect.py (idempotent; exit 3 = the sending rail is busy → say "retry later", don't crash).

2. Show the state

  • python pub_metrics.py status — how many unanswered in total.
  • python pub_comments_report.py — digest of the unanswered ones (spam bots from spam_authors.txt are already flagged 🤖 and filtered out).
  • python pub_metrics.py top-commenters --n 15 — who comments most often.

Show it to the owner compactly: N unanswered per platform · top-5 commenters · link to the dashboard _Dashboards\Pub-Registry-Metrics.html.

3. If the owner asks for replies ("answer the comments" / "+")

Draft-first, sending by hand or on "+":

  1. RECALL the author before every reply to a human: /find <name> (namesearch) + grep the vault + the Telegram profile (get_full_user by author_id from comments). Know who you are writing to.
  2. Tone per channel ([[short-text-when-unreviewed]]): Telegram = a meaningful on-topic reply with context (NOT a 5-word Facebook joke). The owner's voice = the top-tier model.
  3. What to skip: spam bots 🤖 (no reply); old threads where a reply is no longer appropriate (decide explicitly).
  4. Show the batch as a table "comment → draft → which account sends it" and wait for "+". After sending — pub_metrics.py mark-replied --cid <id> (or the next tg_comments_collect.py will set replied by itself).

4. Top commenters → a public call in the group, a DM on top

An active commenter with no CRM card = a candidate. Create the card (CRM), run a RECALL. ⭐ The offer (testers/a call/early access) goes publicly into the group, not by DM — a DM only as a personal nudge AFTER the public call (canon: the house rulebook offer-to-active-people-publicly-not-by-dm, memory public-offer-in-group). Don't send a DM without a "+" ([[telegram-account-identities]]). Clan members are not leads.

Boundaries / safety

  • READ by default. Mass back-dated replying = a hard stop: batch only, and only with a "+".
  • Spam filter: add a new bot wave to spam_authors.txt (author_id # reason).
  • Nothing private from the comments leaks into other channels.

Related

The morning auto-ping of unanswered items into the fleet log chat (05:35, task "Pub-Comments-Morning") and the nightly collection (03:40, collect_pub_metrics.cmd) — this skill is the manual, on-demand twin of those routines. Canon: 00-System\Pub-Metrics-Registry.md, memory content-pub-registry.


<!--kit-footer-->

Like this skill? It is one of 100 in second-brain-starter-kit: the second brain we built for ourselves and run every day at Palo Alto AI Research Lab. Install the whole set with npx skills add tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit. Everything is open source and free, so take what you need.

Flagships worth a look on their own: secondop-panel (a second opinion from a panel of external models), claude-memory-tidy (stop your agent's memory from rotting), telegram-mcp-kit (your own Telegram over MCP in about 15 minutes).

Author: Anton Dziatkovskii, Palo Alto AI Research Lab. Telegram @tonydzi - WhatsApp +1 341 222 9178 - X @Tony_Stef_

Engineers: want to test-drive this setup? Message me. I hand out free starter seeds to engineers who test and report back, and custom skill requests are welcome.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.