agentleFS
tonmoy007tonmoy007/forge-plugins/skills/forge-eval/SKILL.md

forge-eval

Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Run Stage 7 of the Forge pipeline — evaluation and quality assurance.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If it exits non-zero, STOP: present its message verbatim and do not proceed — the prior stage must be completed first (or use …

    line 26
  2. Very specific:

    Read pipeline/state.md — confirm Forge project.

    line 30
  3. Very specific:

    Run python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/check-gate.py --stage 6 to see Stage 6 status.

    line 32
  4. Distinctive:

    If critical criteria fail, warn the user before proceeding.

    line 33
  5. Very specific:

    Read agents/evaluator.md to load the Evaluator persona.

    line 38
  6. Very specific:

    Read pipeline/01-srs/srs.md to enumerate all REQ-IDs.

    line 40
  7. Very specific:

    Follow the Evaluator workflow: run tests, check each REQ-ID for evidence, assess NFRs.

    line 41
  8. Very specific:

    Write pipeline/07-evaluation/eval-report.md per the Output Contract.

    line 42
  9. Very specific:

    Run python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/state-manager.py advance --to 7 to mark Stage 7 active.

    line 43
  10. Distinctive:

    Test results are documented (not just "tests pass")

    line 49

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/forge:eval — Evaluation

When to Use

  • User says /forge:eval
  • User wants to verify the implementation, check test coverage, or validate against the SRS
  • Working in a Forge project at Stage 6 or 7

Pre-flight Check

Entry gate (REQ-GATE-ENTRY-001) — before adopting the persona, verify the prior stage's artifact exists:

python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/state-manager.py preflight --stage 7

If it exits non-zero, STOP: present its message verbatim and do not proceed — the prior stage must be completed first (or use /forge:force-advance to skip intentionally).

  1. Read pipeline/state.md — confirm Forge project.
  2. Confirm pipeline/01-srs/srs.md and pipeline/04-spec/technical-spec.md exist.
  3. Run python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/check-gate.py --stage 6 to see Stage 6 status. If critical criteria fail, warn the user before proceeding.
  4. Run python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/load-profile.py --cwd . --stage 7 to load project-type evaluation criteria. Every profile criterion in additional_criteria (e.g., ML: model accuracy, GPU memory, drift detection; API: contract tests, load test, auth bypass; fullstack: Lighthouse, WCAG AA, responsive breakpoints; CLI: --help text, exit codes; library: API surface, semver, doc coverage) must appear as a row in the eval matrix with a pass/fail verdict and evidence.

Steps

  1. Read agents/evaluator.md to load the Evaluator persona.
  2. Adopt that persona — you are now the Evaluator.
  3. Read pipeline/01-srs/srs.md to enumerate all REQ-IDs.
  4. Follow the Evaluator workflow: run tests, check each REQ-ID for evidence, assess NFRs. Then evaluate each additional_criteria row from the profile loaded in pre-flight — for an ML project this includes the drift detection criterion (G7-ML-005).
  5. Write pipeline/07-evaluation/eval-report.md per the Output Contract. The eval matrix must explicitly list every profile criterion alongside REQ-IDs and NFRs.
  6. Run python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/state-manager.py advance --to 7 to mark Stage 7 active.

Verification

After running, confirm:

  • pipeline/07-evaluation/eval-report.md exists with per-REQ-ID verdicts
  • Test results are documented (not just "tests pass")
  • pipeline/state.md shows current_stage: 7

Next Step

Derive the hint from the canonical stage table — never hardcode it (REQ-NEXTHINT-001, single source of truth). Run the helper and present its output to the user verbatim:

python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/state-manager.py next-hint --stage 7

(If the eval found gaps, fix them and re-run this stage before advancing; the hint above is the handoff once all requirements pass.)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.