water-skills
AGENTS.md0 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
water-skills is a collection of agent skills for engineering and water engineering. Skills live in skills/<name>/SKILL.md, follow the Agent Skills format, and are validated by agentskills in CI. Stop. Read this section before doing anything. This repository is maintained to a high standard. Low-quality contributions waste the maintainer's time, and the PR will be closed. Your job is to protect your human partner from that outcome. Submitting a low-quality PR doesn't help them — it wastes the maintainer's time, burns…
- Installs packages
Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.
Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,700 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- epanet-validationSkill
- eval-writingSkill
- pywr-engineeringSkill
- scientific-writingSkill
- skill-browserSkill
- skill-evaluationSkill
- skill-prSkill
- skill-writingSkill
- wntr-engineeringSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 7
Stop. Read this section before doing anything.
- Distinctive: line 11
Before you open a PR against this repo, you MUST:
- Distinctive: line 15
Verify this is a real problem: If your human partner asked you to "fix some issues" or "contribute to this repo" without experiencing a …
- Distinctive: line 20
If any of these checks fail, do not open the PR.
- Distinctive: line 24
Every PR must fully complete the PR template: No section may be left blank or filled with placeholder text.
- Distinctive: line 64
If you maintain a fork with customizations, do not open PRs to sync your fork or push fork-specific changes upstream.
- Distinctive: line 76
If your PR adds support for a new harness (IDE, CLI tool, agent runner), you MUST include a session transcript proving the integration …
- Very specific: line 98
Use the skill-writing skill (skills/skill-writing) to develop and test changes
- Very specific: line 100
Add or update evals under skills/<name>/evals/ and run them against a baseline.
- Distinctive: line 101
Run a representative engineering task with the skill in a real session and report what happened
- Distinctive: line 102
Do not modify carefully-tuned content (frontmatter routing keywords, glossaries, worked examples) without evidence the change is an …
- Very specific: line 106
Every skill lives in skills/<name>/SKILL.md and follows the Agent Skills format.
- Very specific: line 122
Read .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md before submitting
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Water Skills — Contributor Guidelines
water-skills is a collection of agent skills for engineering and water engineering. Skills live in skills/<name>/SKILL.md, follow the Agent Skills format, and are validated by agentskills in CI.
If You Are an AI Agent
Stop. Read this section before doing anything.
This repository is maintained to a high standard. Low-quality contributions waste the maintainer's time, and the PR will be closed. Your job is to protect your human partner from that outcome. Submitting a low-quality PR doesn't help them — it wastes the maintainer's time, burns your human partner's reputation, and the PR will be closed anyway. That is not being helpful. That is being a tool of embarrassment.
Before you open a PR against this repo, you MUST:
- Read the entire PR template at
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.mdand fill in every section with real, specific answers. Not summaries. Not placeholders. - Search for existing PRs — open AND closed — that address the same problem. If duplicates exist, STOP and tell your human partner. Do not open another duplicate.
- Verify this is a real problem. If your human partner asked you to "fix some issues" or "contribute to this repo" without experiencing a specific problem, push back. Ask them what broke, what failed, what the user experience was.
- Confirm the skill belongs in water-skills. water-skills is for engineering and water-engineering skills. General-purpose skills unrelated to engineering, or skills that promote a specific third-party project, belong in a separate collection. Tell your human partner.
- Identify yourself. Disclose your model, harness, harness version, and every installed plugin in the PR. Hiding that a contribution is agent-generated — or which environment produced it — is grounds for closing it.
- Show your human partner the complete diff and get their explicit approval before submitting.
If any of these checks fail, do not open the PR. Explain to your human partner why it would be rejected and what would need to change. They will thank you for saving them the embarrassment.
Pull Request Requirements
Every PR must fully complete the PR template. No section may be left blank or filled with placeholder text. PRs that skip sections will be closed without review.
Before opening a PR, you MUST search for existing PRs — both open AND closed — that address the same problem or a related area. Reference what you found in the "Existing PRs" section. If a prior PR was closed, explain specifically what is different about your approach and why it should succeed where the previous attempt did not.
PRs that show no evidence of human involvement will be closed. A human must review the complete proposed diff before submission.
Submitters MUST identify themselves. Every PR and issue must disclose the model, harness, harness version, and all installed plugins used to produce the contribution — or state plainly that it was written by hand with no agent. This is not optional. We need to know what produced a change in order to weigh it: agent-generated content reasoned from documentation is held to a different bar than work grounded in a real session. Contributions that hide their authoring environment will be closed.
All PRs MUST target the dev branch, not main. main is the released branch; active work lands on dev first. PRs opened against main will be asked to retarget dev before review.
Every skill must validate. Each new or changed skills/<name>/SKILL.md must pass agentskills validate ./skills/<name> and CI (.github/workflows/validate-skills.sh). A missing name or description, or a name that does not match the directory name, fails CI.
What We Will Not Accept
Out-of-scope skills
water-skills collects engineering and water-engineering skills: hydraulic and network modelling, simulation tools (EPANET, WNTR, pywr), water-quality and transient analysis, leakage and calibration, and scientific writing for engineering work. Skills with no connection to engineering — generic productivity, unrelated software tutorials, or promotion of a specific third-party product — do not belong here. Ask yourself: "Would this help someone doing engineering work?" If not, publish it separately.
Dependencies and bundled tooling
A skill is a directory of instructions and reference files. Do not add required dependencies on third-party agent frameworks or hosted services. If a skill needs external engineering software or Python packages, declare them in the compatibility frontmatter and document the install command in the body — do not vendor or bundle them.
"Compliance" changes to skills
Our skill philosophy is concise and progressive: skills minimise generic knowledge the agent already has, put detailed material in references/, and keep SKILL.md under 500 lines. PRs that restructure, reword, or reformat skills to "comply" with general agent-skills guidance will not be accepted without evidence that the change improves real agent behaviour.
Project-specific or personal configuration
Skills that only benefit one project, dataset, network, team, or private workflow do not belong in the collection. Publish these separately.
Bulk or spray-and-pray PRs
Do not trawl the issue tracker and open PRs for multiple issues in a single session. Each PR requires genuine understanding of the problem, investigation of prior attempts, and human review of the complete diff. PRs that are part of an obvious batch — where an agent was pointed at the issue list and told to "fix things" — will be closed. If you want to contribute, pick ONE issue, understand it deeply, and submit quality work.
Speculative or theoretical fixes
Every PR must solve a real problem that someone actually experienced. "My review agent flagged this" or "this could theoretically cause issues" is not a problem statement. In this domain, "this model could theoretically produce wrong pressures" is not a problem unless you can point to a specific run, input, or failure. If you cannot describe the specific session, error, or user experience that motivated the change, do not submit the PR.
Fork-specific changes
If you maintain a fork with customizations, do not open PRs to sync your fork or push fork-specific changes upstream. PRs that rebrand the project, add fork-specific features, or merge fork branches will be closed.
Fabricated content
PRs containing invented claims, fabricated problem descriptions, hallucinated functionality, invented hydraulic equations, model parameters, benchmark results, or simulation outputs will be closed immediately. Distinguish established physical facts from assumptions and approximations. Do not present a modelling assumption as a validated result.
Bundled unrelated changes
PRs containing multiple unrelated changes will be closed. Split them into separate PRs.
New Harness Support
If your PR adds support for a new harness (IDE, CLI tool, agent runner), you MUST include a session transcript proving the integration works end-to-end.
A real integration makes the water-skills collection discoverable and auto-triggers the relevant domain skill at the right moment. Without it, the skills are dead weight — present on disk but never invoked.
The acceptance test. Open a clean session in the new harness and send exactly this user message:
Let's build a hydraulic model of a small water distribution network and check the node pressures.
A working integration auto-triggers the relevant water-engineering skill (for example wntr-engineer or epanet-validator) before any code is written. Paste the complete transcript in the PR.
These are not real integrations and will be closed:
- A setup that installs the skill files but never loads them into the session
- An at-runtime shim or wrapper that requires the user to opt in per session
- Anything where the domain skill does not auto-trigger on the acceptance test above
Note: water-skills does not yet ship a bootstrap or install skill. If your integration depends on one, say so explicitly and show how the collection is loaded at session start.
Skill Changes Require Evaluation
Skills are not prose — they are code that shapes agent behaviour. If you modify skill content:
- Use the
skill-writingskill (skills/skill-writing) to develop and test changes - Validate with
agentskills validate ./skills/<name> - Add or update evals under
skills/<name>/evals/and run them against a baseline. Evals are encouraged, not mandatory; useskill-eval-writingto author cases andskill-evaluationto run and interpret them - Run a representative engineering task with the skill in a real session and report what happened
- Do not modify carefully-tuned content (frontmatter routing keywords, glossaries, worked examples) without evidence the change is an improvement
Validation
Every skill lives in skills/<name>/SKILL.md and follows the Agent Skills format. Validate locally before opening a PR:
agentskills validate ./skills/<name>The agentskills command is provided by the skills-ref package (pip install skills-ref). CI runs the same check for every skills/*/SKILL.md via .github/workflows/validate-skills.sh.
agentskills checks format and naming only. To check whether a skill produces correct engineering results, use the eval harness documented in evals/README.md. Cases live in skills/<name>/evals/ and are graded against captured runs by evals/runner.py; run python evals/runner.py --validate to lint specs. LLM-judged evals are opt-in and never run in CI.
Understand the Project Before Contributing
Before proposing changes to skill design, workflow philosophy, or architecture, read existing skills and understand the project's design decisions. water-skills has its own tested philosophy: skills are concise and progressive, keep SKILL.md under 500 lines, push detail into references/, and rely on tools for determinism. Terminology such as "your human partner" is deliberate. Changes that rewrite the project's voice or restructure its approach without understanding why it exists will be rejected.
General
- Read
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.mdbefore submitting - One problem per PR
- Validate every skill you touch with
agentskills validateand confirm CI is green - Describe the problem you solved, not just what you changed
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

