blazing-fast-web
Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Makes a web app measurably faster across five fronts (unnecessary re-renders, bundle size and lazy loading, requests and caching, slow queries and N+1, images/fonts/scripts), measuring every change before and after with Chrome DevTools, Playwright, and Sentry MCPs and keeping only what the numbers prove. Use when the user says an app, page, endpoint, or interaction is slow or janky, or asks to speed it up, cut bundle size, reduce re-renders, fix N+1 queries, add caching, or improve Core Web Vitals or Lighthouse scores, even if they don't say "performance".
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-guide-bootstrapSkill
- benchmarkSkill
- create-skillSkill
- gh-issue-creatorSkill
- gh-issue-triageSkill
- gh-pr-comment-assistantSkill
- gh-pr-description-updaterSkill
- gh-pr-listSkill
- git-worktreesSkill
- governance-messageSkill
- grid-reviewSkill
- grill-meSkill
- improve-promptSkill
- investigateSkill
- loop-cve-auditSkill
- loop-react-doctorSkill
- meta-ads-bulk-creatorSkill
- miguel-reviewSkill
- office-hoursSkill
- pr-dashboardSkill
- qa-manualSkill
- review-prSkill
- save-and-archiveSkill
- seo-geo-auditSkill
- share-readySkill
- teachSkill
- ui-reviewSkill
- update-branchSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- verify-prSkill
- whats-missingSkill
- writing-google-styleSkill
- writing-voiceSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈14
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
No optimization ships without a before number and an after number for the same metric, taken the same way.
- Distinctive: line 32
Keep or revert: If the after number isn't better beyond noise, revert the change.
- Distinctive: line 38
Prefer these MCPs when connected.
- Distinctive: line 46
Before starting, check which are available.
- Distinctive: line 71
If Sentry is connected, let it pick: the routes with the worst p75 and the most traffic.
- Distinctive: line 98
Write the baseline into the ledger before touching code, and keep a pristine copy of the original (a copy of the production build, a git …
- Distinctive: line 171
Run the project's tests/typecheck.
- Distinctive: line 173
Keep it if it beats noise (rule of thumb: >5% or clearly outside the spread of the 3 runs).
- Distinctive: line 182
Stop on diminishing returns: when the last two kept changes each moved the goal metric by less than ~5%, stop.
- Distinctive: line 184
Don't experiment on what you don't own: If what's left is a vendor script, the host/CDN config, or a product decision, measure its cost …
- Distinctive: line 219
If Sentry is connected, add a follow-up: compare production p75 for the touched routes a few days after deploy.
- Distinctive: line 224
Never trade correctness for speed: caching must respect auth and invalidation.
- Distinctive: line 226
Keep public contracts: API response shapes, URLs, and component props stay the same.
- Very specific: line 232
No premature memo everywhere.
- Distinctive: line 233
Don't change many things at once to "save time".
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Blazing Fast Web
Make the app faster in ways a user can feel, and prove every gain with numbers. Five fronts, one rule.
The rule: measure before and after every change
No optimization ships without a before number and an after number for the same metric, taken the same way. If you can't measure it, you can't claim it.
- One idea per measurement. Bundle two different fixes and you can't tell which one helped (or which one hurt). The same mechanical fix applied across many files (convert every image, drop one dependency everywhere) is one idea: measure it once.
- Same conditions both times. Same build mode (production, never dev), same URL and data, same throttling, same machine. Run each measurement 3 times and use the median.
- Keep or revert. If the after number isn't better beyond noise, revert the change. "Should be faster" is not a result.
- Log everything in the results ledger (see Report).
Tools
Prefer these MCPs when connected; fall back to CLIs when not.
| Tool | Use it for | Fallback |
| Chrome DevTools MCP | Performance traces (LCP, INP, CLS, long tasks), Lighthouse, network waterfall, coverage (unused JS/CSS), React Profiler via the page | npx lighthouse <url> --output=json (mobile by default) or a Playwright + CDP trace |
| Playwright MCP | Driving real user flows (login → search → checkout) repeatably, timing them, counting requests per flow | npx playwright test with a timing script |
| Sentry MCP | Production truth: slowest transactions, p75/p95, N+1 query and slow-DB-query issues, Web Vitals by route, regressions after deploys | APM/logs the project already has; DB slow-query log |
Before starting, check which are available. If none are, say so and use the bundled scripts below; never skip measuring because a tool is missing.
Bundled scripts (Node + Playwright; use them instead of writing your own harness, which is where most of the time goes otherwise):
# page load + optional typing interaction, mobile throttling, median of 3
node scripts/measure-page.mjs http://localhost:4173/ --ready "main" \
--type "input[type=search]" "lamp" --out before.json
# endpoint latency, payload on the wire, compression, cache headers
node scripts/measure-endpoint.mjs http://localhost:3000/api/orders --runs 10measure-page.mjs reports FCP, LCP, CLS, TBT, bytes by resource type, and,
with --type, INP and long-task time while typing. Run Lighthouse once at
the start and once at the end if the user cares about the score; it is too
slow and noisy to use as the per-step yardstick.
Phase 0 — Scope
- Detect the stack: framework (Next.js, Remix, Vite + React, Vue, SvelteKit…), rendering mode (SSR/SSG/SPA), bundler, ORM/DB, hosting/CDN.
- Pick 2–4 target flows that matter to users: the landing page, the main logged-in screen, the heaviest interaction. Ask the user if unclear. If Sentry is connected, let it pick: the routes with the worst p75 and the most traffic.
- Set the goals for each flow and confirm them with the user. Default: Core Web Vitals "good" (LCP < 2.5 s, INP < 200 ms, CLS < 0.1) and API p95 < 200 ms. Goals tell you when to stop.
- Build for production and run it locally (or use a staging URL). The dev server ships unminified code and extra checks, so its numbers don't reflect what users get.
Phase 1 — Baseline
For each target flow capture, 3 runs, median:
- Web Vitals: LCP, INP (or TBT in lab), CLS, TTFB, FCP.
- Lighthouse performance score (mobile preset, throttled).
- JS shipped: total and per-route JS (gzip/brotli), largest chunks, unused-JS % from coverage.
- Requests: count, total transfer, duplicate requests, cache hit ratio.
- Flow time: Playwright timing from first action to the result visible.
- Server: API p50/p95 for the endpoints the flow hits; query count per request.
- Production (if Sentry): p75 per route, top slow transactions, open N+1 / slow-query issues.
Collect only what the target flows need: a slow endpoint doesn't need Web Vitals, a janky input doesn't need image bytes.
Write the baseline into the ledger before touching code, and keep a pristine copy of the original (a copy of the production build, a git worktree, or the original server on a second port) for the final A/B.
Phase 2 — Find and fix, five fronts
Hunt across all five, then fix in order of impact on the target flows, biggest first. Detailed detection recipes and fixes per stack are in references/playbook.md.
1. Unnecessary re-renders
- Detect: React Profiler / "Highlight updates" (or Vue devtools) while running the flow; look for components re-rendering with unchanged props, whole trees re-rendering on each keystroke, context providers with new object values every render, long tasks during interaction (INP).
- Fix: move state down or lift content up, split contexts, stabilize
props (memo,
useMemo/useCallbackonly where the profiler proves it), virtualize long lists, debounce expensive inputs, use selectors in stores. - Measure: render count and commit duration for the interaction; INP.
2. Bundle size and lazy loading
- Detect: bundle analyzer (
@next/bundle-analyzer,rollup-plugin-visualizer,source-map-explorer), coverage tab for unused JS, heavy deps (moment, lodash full, chart/editor/map libs) in the initial chunk. - Fix: route-level code splitting,
React.lazy/next/dynamicfor below-the-fold and on-interaction UI (modals, editors, charts), lighter replacements, named imports for tree-shaking, move work to the server (RSC/SSR) where the framework allows. - Measure: initial JS per route (compressed), TBT, LCP.
3. Requests and caching
- Detect: network waterfall for request chains, duplicate fetches, over-fetching (large payloads, unused fields), no-cache headers on static assets, client fetches that could be server-side, missing compression.
- Fix: parallelize independent requests, dedupe with a data-fetching
cache (TanStack Query, SWR, framework cache), prefetch on intent,
Cache-Controlwith immutable hashed assets, CDN/edge caching,stale-while-revalidate, paginate and trim payloads, brotli. - Measure: request count and bytes per flow, TTFB, flow time, repeat- visit load time.
4. Slow queries and N+1
- Detect: Sentry N+1 / slow-DB issues; ORM query logging while running
one request (count queries — a list of 50 items making 51 queries is
N+1);
EXPLAIN ANALYZEon the slowest ones; missing indexes on filter, join and sort columns. - Fix: eager loading / joins (
include,select_related,prefetch_related, DataLoader), add the right index, select only needed columns, paginate, cache hot read-mostly results. - Measure: queries per request, query time, endpoint p95.
5. Images, fonts and scripts
- Detect: Lighthouse opportunities, LCP element, oversized images, layout shifts, render-blocking CSS/JS, font swaps, third-party scripts on the main thread.
- Fix: modern formats (AVIF/WebP) with
srcset/sizes, explicit width/height,loading="lazy"below the fold andfetchpriority="high"on the LCP image (never lazy-load it); self-host and subset fonts,font-display: swap, preload only the critical font;defer/asyncscripts, load third parties after interaction or via a worker (Partytown), drop scripts nobody uses. - Measure: LCP, CLS, bytes of images/fonts, main-thread time from third parties.
Phase 3 — The loop
For each candidate fix, in impact order:
- State the hypothesis: "Lazy-loading the chart lib cuts
/dashboardinitial JS by ~180 KB and LCP by ~300 ms." - Make the single change.
- Re-measure the exact metrics from the baseline, same conditions.
- Run the project's tests/typecheck; replay the Playwright flow to confirm nothing broke visually or functionally.
- Keep it if it beats noise (rule of thumb: >5% or clearly outside the spread of the 3 runs); otherwise revert. Log either way.
Budget: know when to stop
The point is a faster app, not an exhaustive search. Long sessions spent on 2% wins cost the user more than they gain.
- Stop at the goals set in Phase 0. Remaining ideas go under "Next".
- Stop on diminishing returns: when the last two kept changes each moved the goal metric by less than ~5%, stop.
- Don't experiment on what you don't own. If what's left is a vendor script, the host/CDN config, or a product decision, measure its cost once (e.g. block the script and re-measure) and report it instead of trying workarounds.
- Skip changes whose expected gain is below your measured noise.
- Explore with 1 quick run; use the full 3 runs only to decide keep/revert.
Phase 4 — Final A/B
Machines drift over a long session (other processes, thermal throttling), so step-by-step numbers taken an hour apart aren't directly comparable. End by measuring the original and the final version back to back, same script, same conditions, 3+ runs each. That comparison is the headline result.
Report
End with the ledger and a short summary:
## Performance results — <app>, <date>
Conditions: production build, Chrome mobile throttling, median of 3 runs.
| # | Change | Metric | Before | After | Δ | Kept |
|---|--------|--------|--------|-------|---|------|
| 1 | Lazy-load chart lib on /dashboard | Initial JS (br) | 412 KB | 231 KB | −44% | ✅ |
| 1 | | LCP | 3.1 s | 2.6 s | −16% | |
| 2 | Fix N+1 in /api/orders (include items) | Queries/request | 51 | 2 | −96% | ✅ |
| 3 | memo on <Row> | Commit time on type | 18 ms | 17 ms | noise | ❌ reverted |
**Final A/B** (original vs final, back to back): LCP 3.1 → 2.2 s · INP 340 → 150 ms · JS 412 → 231 KB · /api/orders p95 900 → 120 ms
**Next** (not done, ranked): …If Sentry is connected, add a follow-up: compare production p75 for the touched routes a few days after deploy.
Guardrails
- Never trade correctness for speed: caching must respect auth and invalidation; lazy-loaded UI needs a loading state; no removed features.
- Keep public contracts: API response shapes, URLs, and component props stay the same. Callers you can't see may depend on them. If trimming a payload or paginating would help, measure the potential gain and propose it under "Next" instead of shipping it.
- Stay inside what the user asked about. Other slow things you notice go under "Next" with a rough size, not into this change.
- No premature
memoeverywhere. Only memoize what the profiler flagged. - Don't change many things at once to "save time". It costs the proof.
- Related skills:
benchmark(regression baselines over time),web-perf(Core Web Vitals audit deep-dive).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

