n8n-workflow-lifecycle
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when starting, designing, organizing, validating, testing, publishing, or handing off any n8n workflow. Covers naming, folders/projects, sticky notes, validation vs verification, side-effect-aware testing, and production handoff.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- LucasGS520/Claude-Skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 15, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- LucasGS520/Claude-Skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- n8n-agentsSkill
- n8n-ai-seo-geo-automationSkill
- n8n-binary-dataSkill
- n8n-code-nodesSkill
- n8n-credentials-securitySkill
- n8n-data-tablesSkill
- n8n-debuggingSkill
- n8n-error-handlingSkill
- n8n-expressionsSkill
- n8n-loopsSkill
- n8n-mcp-toolingSkill
- n8n-node-configurationSkill
- n8n-production-opsSkill
- n8n-subworkflowsSkill
- using-n8n-skillsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 31
Ask before tests that hit real external systems.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
n8n Workflow Lifecycle
Author: Taghi Molavi · Pack: n8n-agent-skills
Stages (do not skip)
- CLARIFY — trigger, inputs/outputs, side effects, env (dev/stage/prod), folder/project, success criteria.
- DISCOVER — search existing workflows/sub-workflows/tags before duplicating logic (
n8n-subworkflows). - DESIGN — outline nodes on paper/sticky notes; identify credentials needed; error strategy.
- BUILD — create inactive; prefer expressions; wire carefully (no
.to()-inside-.add()traps in SDK). - VALIDATE — schema lint + re-fetch workflow and inspect
connectionsobject. - WIRE-UP (user) — credentials per node, folders, webhook URLs — things the agent cannot invent.
- TEST — pin/mock where possible; ask before real side effects (
references/TESTING.md). - PUBLISH/ACTIVATE — only after 5–7 clean.
- HANDOFF — how to trigger, expected output, monitors, known limits.
Non-negotiables
- Validate and verify connections before activate.
- Surface platform limits (folders need registered instance on official MCP, etc.) instead of silent wrong placement.
- Ask before tests that hit real external systems.
Naming (short)
- Workflows: verb-first, scoped —
Sync HubSpot deals to BigQuery nightly - Nodes: what they do here —
Fetch open dealsnotHTTP Request1 - Tags: lowercase, 2–4 —
subworkflow, domain, env (prod/staging) - Full rules:
references/NAMING.md
Readability
- Workflow
description: 1–2 sentences of what + why - Sticky notes for non-obvious why (not restating node titles)
- Group related nodes; extract sub-workflow only for reuse/isolation/agent-tool — not mere canvas tidiness
Execution model reminder
n8n runs fan-out branches sequentially (top-to-bottom by Y). Not parallel. For real concurrency use sub-workflows with waitForSubWorkflow: false patterns — see n8n-loops and n8n-subworkflows.
Validation is not enough
Lint/validate misses: dropped wires, fan-out collapse, Merge off-by-one, error output without onError: continueErrorOutput, semantically wrong but schema-valid IDs. Always re-read connections + run a representative test.
Checklists
- Pre-publish:
references/VALIDATION_CHECKLIST.md - Human review:
references/REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md - Testing:
references/TESTING.md
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

