source-command-trellis-finish-work
Skill2 starsChanged 26 days agoMITView on GitHub
Migrated source command `trellis-finish-work`
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- source-command-trellis-continueSkill
- trellis-before-devSkill
- trellis-brainstormSkill
- trellis-break-loopSkill
- trellis-channelSkill
- trellis-checkSkill
- trellis-continueSkill
- trellis-finish-workSkill
- trellis-metaSkill
- trellis-session-insightSkill
- trellis-spec-bootstrapSkill
- trellis-startSkill
- trellis-update-specSkill
- trellis-before-devSkill
- trellis-brainstormSkill
- trellis-break-loopSkill
- trellis-channelSkill
- trellis-checkSkill
- trellis-metaSkill
- trellis-session-insightSkill
- trellis-spec-bootstrapSkill
- trellis-update-specSkill
- delegate-with-codedeckSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Use this skill when the user asks to run the migrated source command trellis-finish-work.
- Distinctive: line 51
Do NOT run git commit here.
- Distinctive: line 64
If there is no active task and the user did not confirm any cleanup archives, skip this step.
- Very specific: line 75
Use the work-commit hashes produced in Phase 3.4 (visible in Step 1's Recent commits list, or via git log --oneline) for --commit.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
source-command-trellis-finish-work
Use this skill when the user asks to run the migrated source command trellis-finish-work.
Command Template
Finish Work
Wrap up the current session: archive the active task (and any other completed-but-unarchived tasks the user wants to clean up) and record the session journal. Code commits are NOT done here — those happen in workflow Phase 3.4 before you invoke this command.
Step 1: Survey current state
python ./.trellis/scripts/get_context.py --mode recordThis prints:
- My active tasks — review whether any besides the current one are actually done (code merged, AC met) and should be archived this round.
- Git status — quick visual on what's dirty.
- Recent commits — you'll need their hashes in Step 4 for
--commit.
If --mode record surfaces other completed tasks not tied to the current session, surface them to the user with a one-shot confirmation: "These N tasks look done — archive them too in this round? [y/N]". Default is no; the current active task is always archived in Step 3 regardless.
Step 2: Sanity check — classify dirty paths
Run:
git status --porcelainFilter out paths under .trellis/workspace/ and .trellis/tasks/ — those are managed by add_session.py and task.py archive auto-commits and will appear dirty as part of this skill's own work.
For each remaining dirty path, decide whether it belongs to the current task or to other parallel work (e.g., another terminal window editing the same repo). Heuristics:
- Paths referenced in the current task's
prd.md/implement.jsonl/check.jsonl→ current task - Paths in code areas matching the task's stated scope, or that you remember editing this session → current task
- Paths in unrelated areas you have no recollection of touching this session → other parallel work
Then route:
Any remaining path looks like current-task work — bail out with:
"Working tree has uncommitted code changes from this task:
<list>. Return to workflow Phase 3.4 to commit them before running/trellis:finish-work."Do NOT run
git commithere. Do NOT prompt the user to commit. The user goes back to Phase 3.4 and the AI drives the batched commit there.- All remaining paths look unrelated (other parallel-window work) — report them once and continue to Step 3:
"FYI, dirty files outside this task's scope — leaving them for the other window:
<list>." - Genuinely unsure — ask the user once: "Are
<list>this task's work I forgot to commit, or another window's? (commit / ignore)" — then route per their answer.
Step 3: Archive task(s)
python ./.trellis/scripts/task.py archive <task-name>At minimum: the current active task (if any). Plus any extra tasks the user confirmed in Step 1. Each archive produces a chore(task): archive ... commit via the script's auto-commit.
If there is no active task and the user did not confirm any cleanup archives, skip this step.
Step 4: Record session journal
python ./.trellis/scripts/add_session.py \
--title "Session Title" \
--commit "hash1,hash2" \
--summary "Brief summary"Use the work-commit hashes produced in Phase 3.4 (visible in Step 1's Recent commits list, or via git log --oneline) for --commit. Do not include the archive commit hashes from Step 3. This produces a chore: record journal commit.
Final git log order: <work commits from 3.4> → chore(task): archive ... (one or more) → chore: record journal.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

