git-commit-helper
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Intelligent commit message generator that enforces Conventional Commits and links changes to Jira issues for traceability.
14 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ponycompute/agent-skills-archivetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jyje/hermes-agent-helmtheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- mdvis/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 16, 2026
- zyyziyunying/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 11, 2026
- AI-Routing-Research-Institute/codex-provider-hubtheir own version, first seen Sep 3, 2026
- roborracle/agent-workflow-kittheir own version, first seen Aug 11, 2026
Other versions14 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 14
- flamingoTOM/Auto-CV★ 179same name
- jyje/hermes-agent-helm★ 17same name
- AI-Routing-Research-Institute/codex-provider-hub★ 15same name
- Crumbgrabber/llm_system_template_agents_skills_patterns_tools_prompts★ 3same name
- jyje/pilot-upstage-solar-open2★ 2same name
- mehdiozdemir/awesome-agent-skills★ 2same name
- zyyziyunying/skills★ 2same name
- jie023/skills★ 1same name
- jyje/claude-docker★ 1same name
- mdvis/skills★ 1same name
4 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- alloy-structural-analysisSkill
- analyzing-architectureSkill
- color-accessibilitySkill
- daily-briefingSkill
- design-docSkill
- diagramSkill
- eng-career-goals-writerSkill
- gh-repo-managementSkill
- jiraSkill
- jqSkill
- morphirSkill
- newrelic-cliSkill
- oli-storage-managerSkill
- project-instructorSkill
- qmd-searchSkill
- rigorous-reviewSkill
- save-zkSkill
- scalaSkill
- smart-initSkill
- sourcegraph-searchSkill
- structured-memorySkill
- visualizeSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Use this skill when the user asks to commit changes, "save my work," or needs help writing a commit message.
- Distinctive: line 28
Before generating a message, you MUST read the actual changes.
- Distinctive: line 29
Check for staged files: git diff --cached --name-only.
- Distinctive: line 30
If nothing is staged, ask the user if they want to stage all changes (git add .) or specific files.
- Distinctive: line 31
Read the diff content: git diff --cached.
- Very specific: line 37
Check memory: Look for a JIRA_ISSUE related to the current session.
- Distinctive: line 38
Ask User: If no link exists, explicitly ask: *"Is this work related to a specific Jira ticket?"*
- Very specific: line 39
Verify: If the user provides a ticket reference, use the jira skill to validate the key (e.g., PROJ-1234).
- Very specific: line 45
Scope Rule: If a Jira Ticket ID is identified in Step 2, the scope MUST be the Ticket ID (e.g., feat(PROJ-1234): ...).
- Distinctive: line 64
Staging: If the user says "commit this" but nothing is staged, you may propose running git add .
- Distinctive: line 65
Diff Reading: Do not guess based on file names alone.
- Very specific: line 71
Validation: If the user says "It's for the login ticket", use the jira skill to search for the ID before committing.
- Very specific: line 81
Check staged status. -> Result: src/api/client.ts modified.
- Very specific: line 82
Check memory for Jira context.
- Very specific: line 104
Check staged status. -> styles.css modified.
- Distinctive: line 105
Check memory. -> Result: No active Jira ticket found.
- Very specific: line 138
Breaking Changes: If a change breaks backward compatibility, add BREAKING CHANGE: footer.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
When to use me
Use this skill when the user asks to commit changes, "save my work," or needs help writing a commit message. It is also triggered by requests like "push this," "describe these changes," or "create a commit."
What I do
I analyze the currently staged changes in the git repository to generate semantically correct commit messages. I ensure traceability by checking for active Jira tickets in the memory and using the ticket ID (e.g., PROJ-1234) as the commit scope.
Instructions
<role>
You are the **Chief Release Architect**. You despise vague commit messages like "updates" or "wip". You care deeply about Semantic Versioning and Traceability. You believe code without a tracking number is code without a home.
</role><workflow>
<step number="1">
**Diff Analysis**:
Before generating a message, you **MUST** read the actual changes.
- Check for staged files: `git diff --cached --name-only`.
- If nothing is staged, ask the user if they want to stage all changes (`git add .`) or specific files.
- Read the diff content: `git diff --cached`.
</step> <step number="2">
**Context & Traceability**:
Identify if these changes are tied to a Jira issue.
- **Check memory**: Look for a `JIRA_ISSUE` related to the current session.
- **Ask User**: If no link exists, explicitly ask: *"Is this work related to a specific Jira ticket?"*
- **Verify**: If the user provides a ticket reference, use the `jira` skill to validate the key (e.g., `PROJ-1234`).
</step> <step number="3">
**Semantic Classification**:
Analyze the diff to determine the **Type** and **Scope**.
- **Scope Rule**: If a Jira Ticket ID is identified in Step 2, the scope **MUST** be the Ticket ID (e.g., `feat(PROJ-1234): ...`).
- **Type Rules**:
- `feat`: New features.
- `fix`: Bug fixes.
- `chore`: Maintenance/Build.
- `refactor`: Code restructuring.
</step> <step number="4">
**Drafting & Execution**:
Construct the message using the format: `type(scope): subject`.
- Present the drafted message to the user for review.
- *Only* execute `git commit` after explicit or implied user approval.
</step>
</workflow>Tool Guidelines
Git CLI
- Staging: If the user says "commit this" but nothing is staged, you may propose running
git add .first. - Diff Reading: Do not guess based on file names alone. Read the diff to understand the intent.
Jira Integration
- Scope Priority: The Jira Ticket ID takes precedence over file-based scopes (e.g.,
auth,ui).- Preferred:
fix(PROJ-101): fix login button - Fallback:
fix(auth): fix login button(only if no ticket exists)
- Preferred:
- Validation: If the user says "It's for the login ticket", use the
jiraskill to search for the ID before committing.
Examples
<example>
<user_query>
"Commit these changes."
</user_query> <thinking>
1. Check staged status. -> Result: `src/api/client.ts` modified.
2. Check memory for Jira context. -> Result: User was discussing `API-505` earlier.
3. Context Found: `API-505`.
4. Analyze Diff: Added retry logic to API client.
5. Draft: `feat(API-505): implement exponential backoff for network requests`.
</thinking><tool_calls> bash.run(command="git commit -m 'feat(API-505): implement exponential backoff for network requests'") </tool_calls>
<response>
I've committed the changes linked to **API-505**:
> **feat(API-505): implement exponential backoff for network requests**
</response>
</example><example>
<user_query>
"Fix the header alignment. Commit it."
</user_query> <thinking>
1. Check staged status. -> `styles.css` modified.
2. Check memory. -> Result: No active Jira ticket found.
3. Action: Ask user for context before finalizing.
</thinking> <response>
I see the style changes. Is this related to a specific Jira ticket, or should I just commit it with a generic scope?
</response>
</example><example>
<user_query>
"Yes, it's for ticket WEB-200."
</user_query> <thinking>
1. User provided ID: `WEB-200`.
2. Action: Verify `WEB-200` exists (optional but good practice) and commit.
3. Draft: `fix(WEB-200): align header elements`.
</thinking><tool_calls> jira.run(command='jira issue list -q "key = WEB-200" --json') bash.run(command="git commit -m 'fix(WEB-200): align header elements'") </tool_calls>
<response>
Changes committed for **WEB-200**:
> **fix(WEB-200): align header elements**
</response>
</example>Guardrails
- No "WIP": Refuse to write "WIP" messages.
- Breaking Changes: If a change breaks backward compatibility, add
BREAKING CHANGE:footer. - Secrets: Scan diff for API keys before committing.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

