agentleFS
titouannwtttitouannwtt/claude-tools/skills/skill-forge/SKILL.md

skill-forge

Skill1 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub

Decide whether to create a skill for a reusable request (tool, script, download, transcription, analysis), then design it, research it and build it after agreement. Use when a request is substantial and reusable across projects, or when the user asks to create or improve a skill.

  • Reads credentials

52 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use sigma, agent-forge and 3 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • sanyuan0704Skill

    sigma

    Personalized 1-on-1 AI tutor using Bloom's 2-Sigma mastery learning. Guides users through any topic with Socratic questioning, adaptive pacing, and rich visual output (HTML dashboards, Excalidraw concept maps, generated images). Use when user wants to learn something, study a topic, understand a concept, requests tutoring, says 'teach me', 'I want to learn', 'explain X to me step by step', 'help me understand', or invokes /sigma. Triggers on: learn, study, teach, tutor, understand, master, explain step by step.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • xyreinsurance119Skill

    agent-forge

    Создание, улучшение и аудит скиллов и агентов OpenClaw. Три режима: создание скилла (11 шагов), создание агента (9 шагов, с памятью и автоулучшением), улучшение существующего (5 шагов). Triggers: 'создай скилл', 'новый скилл', 'создай агента', 'новый агент', 'улучши скилл', 'skill creator', 'agent creator', 'скиллмейкер'.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • localSummerSkill

    skill-review

    回顾当前对话,整理 skill 使用情况、代码质量反馈和迭代建议,生成待确认的更新清单

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • NVIDIASkill

    deep-research

    Queue deep, multi-step research and analysis tasks to the DeepAgents worker. Supports execution depth presets, request-specific rubrics, SubAgent delegation, and RubricMiddleware cross-validation.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    code-review

    Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 44 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Distinctive:

    If nothing covers the request, write: "We have no skill for this.

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    Wait for the answer. Without agreement, create nothing.

    line 19
  3. Very specific:

    Before publishing, add the skill to the repository's showcase (in English): one row in the "Skills" table of README.md (name linked to …

    line 64
  4. Very specific:

    check for secrets, e-mails, IPs, personal paths and the forbidden terms of local.env (tools/check_repo.py --staged).

    line 71
  5. Distinctive:

    commit and push to main;

    line 73
  6. Very specific:

    Never bypass the check (--no-verify) nor commit a local.env file.

    line 77
  7. Very specific:

    No personal name, handle or personal path in a versioned file.

    line 81
  8. Very specific:

    No committed secret. Proxy or API credentials stay in local.env.

    line 82

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 44 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

skill-forge

Objective: accumulate reusable skills, one by one, without creating any wrongly. A skill is not justified for a one-off task; it is for a capability that will be useful in other projects.

1. Check what exists

List ~/.claude/skills/ and skills/ of the claude-tools repository. If a skill covers the request, use it and stop there.

2. Propose, do not create

If nothing covers the request, write: "We have no skill for this. It looks useful for later. Do you want me to create it?" Wait for the answer. Without agreement, create nothing.

3. Plan (after agreement)

Present a short plan, to be validated before any implementation:

  • Name (kebab-case, generic, no personal name or hard-coded path).
  • Scope: what the skill does, and what it does not do.
  • Inputs and outputs: arguments, output format (text, JSON).
  • Script: language, justification (see section 4), planned tests.
  • Research: sources to explore (GitHub repositories, crates.io, PyPI, official documentation).
  • Configuration: local values (paths, identifiers) in local.env, ignored by git.

4. Choose the language

Rust feasibility checklist, to fill in before writing the script:

  1. Is the work compute-bound (heavy loops, parsing large volumes)? Yes/no.
  2. Does a single dependency-free binary need to be distributed? Yes/no.
  3. Will the script be called very often (dozens of times a day)? Yes/no.
  • At least one "yes" and a measured or estimated gain: Rust.
  • Otherwise, or if the work is tied to the network and to subprocesses (yt-dlp, ffmpeg, APIs): Python (standard library preferred). Say in the plan why Rust is not chosen.
  • Rule validated by the user: Rust only if the gain is measured, Python otherwise.

5. Research (subagent)

Launch a researcher (Haiku 5.5, medium ; high if many sources) with a complete brief: question, sources, criteria (license, maintenance, installation, limits), report format as a table with URL and date accessed. Recommend nothing without this table.

6. Build

  • Short SKILL.md: when to use it, which command to run, what to do on error.
  • The script does the work (deterministic, JSON output, exit codes, a doctor subcommand that checks the dependencies).
  • Unit tests in tests/ (run with python3 -m unittest).
  • Repair: if the script fails, the agent reads the error, fixes the script, reruns. Two attempts at most, then it reports back to the user. The script must never ask a model to do the work in its place.

7. Publish

The skill is created in skills/<name>/ of the claude-tools repository (its local clone; readlink ~/.claude/skills/skill-forge gives the location). Once the tests are green, run from the repository root:

tools/publish_skill.sh <name> ["commit message"]

Before publishing, add the skill to the repository's showcase (in English): one row in the "Skills" table of README.md (name linked to skills/<name>, role, dependencies, claude.ai compatibility) and a card in assets/skills.svg (icon, name, tagline; enlarge the grid if it is full). The banner and README counters are updated by the script (tools/sync_counts.py), which also flags a skill missing from the showcase.

The script chains the following, with no other intervention: 0. counter update (tools/sync_counts.py);

  1. check for secrets, e-mails, IPs, personal paths and the forbidden terms of local.env (tools/check_repo.py --staged); on a finding, nothing is committed, fix then rerun;
  2. commit and push to main;
  3. git pull and ./install.sh on the other machine (PEER_SSH setting of local.env), which creates the link in ~/.claude/skills/. Without PEER_SSH, it prints the command to run by hand.

Never bypass the check (--no-verify) nor commit a local.env file.

Safeguards

  • No personal name, handle or personal path in a versioned file. Local values go in local.env.
  • No committed secret. Proxy or API credentials stay in local.env.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.