pr-reviewer
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Pre-reviews your PR before you push. Diffs against main, flags risks, checks test coverage delta, suggests reviewers. Trigger phrases: review my PR, pre-pr, before I push, am I ready to push, /pr-review. Auto-activate when user runs git push on a feature branch (PreToolUse hook, optional install). /pr-review — run on current branch. /pr-review push — run review, then push if score ≥75 with no red flags. Self-review catches 60% of "junior" mistakes before another human spends time on it. Pre-push…
- Reads credentials
- Commits and pushes
22 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- idavidov13/agentic-playwrighttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- getpapi/papitheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- kcayme/k-agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- odykyi/gh-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- archiforge/agent-crafttheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experiencetheir own version, first seen Oct 16, 2026
Other versions22 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 22
- pyuvm/pyuvm★ 574same name
- Fu-Jie/awesome-openwebui★ 326same name
- Fu-Jie/openwebui-extensions★ 326same name
- idavidov13/agentic-playwright★ 268same name
- proflead/codex-skills-library★ 153same name
- h0tp-ftw/ankimon★ 83same name
- glincker/claude-code-marketplace★ 37same name
- jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience★ 13same name
- getpapi/papi★ 11same name
- tstapler/dotfiles★ 8same name
12 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- commit-curatorSkill
- context-compactorSkill
- cost-trackerSkill
- decision-recorderSkill
- mcp-finderSkill
- permission-auditorSkill
- prd-builderSkill
- prompt-matcherSkill
- repo-onboarderSkill
- scope-clarifierSkill
- skill-matcherSkill
- tdd-flowSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 22 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 32
No new tests added but new production code present
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 22 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
pr-reviewer
Pre-reviews your PR before you push. Diffs against main, flags risks, checks test coverage delta, suggests reviewers.
When to activate
Trigger phrases: review my PR, pre-pr, before I push, am I ready to push, /pr-review.
Auto-activate when user runs git push on a feature branch (PreToolUse hook, optional install).
Process
- Determine the base branch (
main,master, or whatever GitHub default is) - Compute the diff:
git diff <base>...HEAD - Run checks below
- Generate a review report with risk score
- Suggest fix-before-push items vs nice-to-have
Checks
Risk flags (each = -10 to safety score)
- Force push detected
.env,*.key,*.pemin diff- Hardcoded secrets pattern (
sk-,Bearer,AKIA,ghp_) 500 line single-commit diff (suggest split)
- Migration file added but no rollback script
- New endpoint with no auth check
- Direct DB call in route handler (bypasses repository pattern, if used)
- New external dependency added (which one, why, alternatives)
Yellow flags (each = -3)
- No new tests added but new production code present
- TODO/FIXME added without ticket reference
- Console.log / print() / debug statements in diff
- Commented-out code blocks
- File renamed without rg-checking for references
Green flags (each = +3)
- Tests added that cover new code paths
- ADR linked in PR body
- Conventional commit messages used
- Diff < 200 lines
- README/docs updated alongside code
Output
PR Review: feat/rate-limit-middleware → main
=============================================
Diff stats: 6 files changed, 142 +, 18 -
Safety score: 78/100
✗ Risk (blocks push):
none
⚠ Yellow flags:
- 1 TODO added without ticket: middleware/rate_limit.py:45
- console.log left in: middleware/rate_limit.py:67
✓ Green flags:
- Tests added (test_rate_limit.py, 4 cases)
- Diff is 142 lines — focused
- Conventional commits used
Suggested reviewers: (based on git blame)
- alice@company.com (touched middleware/ 12 times this quarter)
- bob@company.com (owns auth module)
Suggested PR body:
## What
Adds IP-based rate limiting to /login.
## Why
Prevents brute-force after 5 failed attempts in 60s.
## Test
pytest tests/test_rate_limit.py
## Risk
Low — fail-open if redis unreachable.
Fix before push:
1. Remove console.log on line 67
2. Either delete TODO or link to a ticket
Ready to push? (y / fix-then-push)Inputs
- Current branch + base branch
- Diff
- git blame for "suggested reviewers" feature
Outputs
- Review report
- Suggested PR body
- Fix list
- Reviewer suggestions
Slash command
/pr-review — run on current branch.
/pr-review push — run review, then push if score ≥75 with no red flags.
Why this skill
Self-review catches 60% of "junior" mistakes before another human spends time on it. Pre-push is the cheapest place to fix anything.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

