agentleFS
tim-osterhustim-osterhus/millrace-skills/skills/golden-dataset/SKILL.md

golden-dataset

Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Guardrail for curating, versioning, validating, and protecting golden datasets used for evals, regression checks, and model comparisons.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Keep train, dev, test, and golden regression sets separate.

    line 31
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not call a dataset golden because it is merely convenient or large.

    line 37
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not mix generated labels and human labels without provenance.

    line 38
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not allow training data leakage into held-out evaluation sets.

    line 39
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not edit expected answers without preserving the old version or rationale.

    line 40
  6. Distinctive:

    Prefer fewer reviewed examples over many weak examples.

    line 41
  7. Distinctive:

    Add provenance, review status, and row IDs.

    line 58
  8. Distinctive:

    Run a small consumer smoke test.

    line 62
  9. Distinctive:

    Start with schema and provenance.

    line 72

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Golden Dataset

Purpose

Help agents create and maintain high-trust datasets for evaluation and regression checks. This skill covers schema, provenance, versioning, review, backups, train/eval separation, and quality metrics.

Quick Start

  1. Define dataset purpose and schema before adding rows.
  2. Record provenance and review status for every row.
  3. Keep train, dev, test, and golden regression sets separate.
  4. Validate schema and labels automatically.
  5. Version dataset changes with changelog-style notes.
  6. Back up important releases before major edits.

Operating Constraints

  • Do not call a dataset golden because it is merely convenient or large.
  • Do not mix generated labels and human labels without provenance.
  • Do not allow training data leakage into held-out evaluation sets.
  • Do not edit expected answers without preserving the old version or rationale.
  • Prefer fewer reviewed examples over many weak examples.

Inputs This Skill Expects

  • Dataset purpose, schema, allowed labels, and consumers.
  • Existing rows, source traces, documents, or seed examples.
  • Reviewers, label policy, and quality thresholds.
  • Storage, versioning, and backup location.

Output Contract

  • Produce or update a validated dataset with row IDs, provenance, labels, expected behavior, and review status.
  • Include a summary of additions, removals, repairs, and quality risks.
  • State split strategy and leakage checks.
  • State backup or version tag created when relevant.

Procedure

  1. Define the dataset contract and consumers.
  2. Normalize rows into a stable schema.
  3. Add provenance, review status, and row IDs.
  4. Validate schema, label values, duplicates, and split leakage.
  5. Review high-impact rows manually.
  6. Version the dataset and document changes.
  7. Run a small consumer smoke test.

Pitfalls And Gotchas

  • Treating synthetic examples as golden without review.
  • Editing expectations to match a new model instead of product truth.
  • Losing provenance during deduplication.
  • Ignoring class imbalance and coverage gaps.
  • Letting old benchmark rows drift from current product behavior.

Progressive Disclosure

Start with schema and provenance. Expand into backup, restore, label review, synthetic augmentation, or benchmark governance only when the dataset becomes release-critical.

Verification Pattern

  • Confirm schema validation passes.
  • Confirm every row has provenance and review status.
  • Confirm split leakage checks pass.
  • Confirm important changes are versioned and reversible.
  • Confirm a downstream eval or regression smoke run can consume the dataset.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.