chrome-web-store-listing
Skill2 starsChanged 50 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use whenever the user needs a Chrome Web Store submission ready — listing copy, permission justifications, Privacy practices tab, privacy policy page, store screenshots, or promo tiles. Triggers: "chrome web store listing", "store screenshots", "promo tile", "permission justification", "privacy practices", "single purpose", "publish extension", "submit to the store", "extension rejected", "store icon", "marquee tile". Covers manifest-derived title/summary/description copy (never invented features), a justification template for every common MV3 permission (storage, activeTab, tabs, scripting, host permissions/<all_urls>, identity, clipboard, notifications, alarms), the data-usage table plus certifications, a privacy-policy template synced with those disclosures, exact graphics specs (icon, screenshots, small tile, marquee) with a Playwright capture-and-compose script at exact pixel sizes, and the submission workflow (dev fee, item ID hand-off, zip packaging, rejections, review times).
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 27
Every claim in the listing, the privacy practices tab, and the privacy policy must trace back to something real in the codebase:
- Distinctive: line 35
If the user asks for copy about a feature you cannot find in the code, say so and ask, instead of writing it anyway.
- Very specific: line 46
Write the listing copy: Follow references/listing-copy.md for the title/summary (summary = manifest description, ≤132 chars), the …
- Very specific: line 50
Fill the Privacy practices tab: Follow references/privacy-practices-and-permissions.md: one single-purpose sentence, one justification per …
- Very specific: line 56
Write or update the privacy policy page: Follow references/privacy-policy-template.md.
- Distinctive: line 57
Every tick in step 3's disclosure table must have a matching sentence in the policy, and vice versa — cross-check them side by side before …
- Very specific: line 59
Produce the graphics: Follow references/graphics-specs-and-recipe.md for exact specs (icon, screenshots, small tile, marquee) and the …
- Very specific: line 65
Walk the submission checklist: Follow references/submission-and-review.md: developer registration fee, first-upload item ID hand-off, zip …
- Very specific: line 88
If omitted, the script tries to import('playwright') from its own resolution scope.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Chrome Web Store Listing
Scope
This skill handles the store submission package: listing copy, privacy disclosures, the privacy policy page, promo graphics, and the review/publish process.
It does not handle:
- Extension engineering (manifest, content scripts, background worker) →
chrome-extension-dev - OAuth/sign-in flows and their redirect URIs →
chrome-extension-auth - Backend deploy, CORS allowlists, CI/CD →
chrome-extension-deploy - Payment/billing integration →
chrome-extension-payments
This skill reads the manifest and codebase to write accurate copy; it does not build or deploy
the extension or its backend. When the first store upload assigns an item ID, hand the ID off to
chrome-extension-auth (OAuth redirect URI) and chrome-extension-deploy (CORS allowlist) —
don't try to edit those systems from here.
Ground rule: derive facts, never invent them
Every claim in the listing, the privacy practices tab, and the privacy policy must trace back to something real in the codebase:
- Permissions and
optional_permissions→ read the manifest (orwxt.config.ts/manifest.jsonsource) directly. - Features and pricing → read the actual UI/pricing code, not assumptions.
- Data that "leaves the device" → read the actual network calls (API client, background worker fetches), not what would be convenient to disclose.
If the user asks for copy about a feature you cannot find in the code, say so and ask, instead of writing it anyway. If permissions change, the listing description, the privacy practices tab, and the privacy policy must all be updated together — treat them as one synchronized document, not three independent ones.
Workflow
- Inventory the facts first. Find the manifest (permissions,
optional_permissions,name,description, host permissions), the pricing/plan definitions, and any outbound network calls (what data actually leaves the device, and to whom). This is the source of truth for every later step. - Write the listing copy. Follow
references/listing-copy.mdfor the title/summary (summary = manifestdescription, ≤132 chars), the description structure (hook → how it works → features → privacy → free vs pro → pricing → support), category/language choice, and keyword guidance that stays inside the Store's no-keyword-stuffing policy. - Fill the Privacy practices tab. Follow
references/privacy-practices-and-permissions.md: one single-purpose sentence, one justification per permission (use the template library — do not reuse another extension's wording verbatim, adapt it to what this extension actually does), "remote code: No" unless the code truly fetches and executes remote code, the data-usage disclosure table (tick only what actually leaves the device), and the three certifications. - Write or update the privacy policy page. Follow
references/privacy-policy-template.md. Every tick in step 3's disclosure table must have a matching sentence in the policy, and vice versa — cross-check them side by side before moving on. - Produce the graphics. Follow
references/graphics-specs-and-recipe.mdfor exact specs (icon, screenshots, small tile, marquee) and the capture-then-compose recipe: capture real UI with Playwright against the unpacked build (mocked network, seed/demo data — never a real user's data), then render branded HTML frames around those captures at the exact final pixel size withscripts/render-store-assets.mjsandassets/slide-template.html. Render the store icon from the brand SVG the same way. - Walk the submission checklist. Follow
references/submission-and-review.md: developer registration fee, first-upload item ID hand-off, zip packaging (no manifestkey), versioning, common rejection reasons, review times, and how to respond to a rejection.
Quick reference index
| Need | File |
| Title, summary, description, category, SEO | references/listing-copy.md |
| Single purpose + permission justifications + data usage table | references/privacy-practices-and-permissions.md |
| Privacy policy page copy | references/privacy-policy-template.md |
| Icon/screenshot/promo tile specs + Playwright recipe | references/graphics-specs-and-recipe.md |
| Dev account, upload, rejections, review times | references/submission-and-review.md |
| Render promo screenshots/tiles/icon | scripts/render-store-assets.mjs + assets/slide-template.html + assets/example-slides.json |
Running the render script
node scripts/render-store-assets.mjs <slides.json> --out <output-dir> [--playwright-cwd <dir-with-playwright-installed>]--playwright-cwd should point at a project whose node_modules already has playwright or
@playwright/test (for example the extension app itself) so the skill doesn't need its own copy.
If omitted, the script tries to import('playwright') from its own resolution scope. See
references/graphics-specs-and-recipe.md for the slide JSON schema and
assets/example-slides.json for a worked example. Always write output outside the extension
repo's tracked docs/ folder until reviewed, then move the final files in.
Verify-on-dashboard flags
A few Chrome Web Store specifics change without notice. Anything marked "verify on the dashboard" in the reference files should be re-checked against the live Developer Dashboard before submission — do not treat those numbers as permanently fixed.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

