scorecard-review
Skill2 starsChanged 7 months agoApache-2.0Archived repositoryView on GitHub
Review service maturity scorecards and compliance using Harness IDP via MCP. Check production readiness, security, and documentation scores. Use when user says "scorecard", "service maturity", "production readiness", "compliance score", or asks about service health scores.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 136
Verify scorecards are configured in IDP settings
- Distinctive: line 137
Check entity is registered in the catalog
- Distinctive: line 138
Ensure data sources (CI/CD, monitoring) are connected
- Distinctive: line 141
Check integration sync status
- Distinctive: line 142
Verify data source connectivity
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Scorecard Review
Review service maturity and compliance scorecards using Harness Internal Developer Portal (IDP) via MCP.
Instructions
Step 1: List Catalog Entities
Call MCP tool: harness_list
Parameters:
resource_type: "idp_entity"
org_id: "<organization>"
project_id: "<project>"Step 2: Get Entity Details
Call MCP tool: harness_get
Parameters:
resource_type: "idp_entity"
resource_id: "<entity_id>"Step 3: Get Scorecard Scores
Call MCP tool: harness_list
Parameters:
resource_type: "idp_score"
org_id: "<organization>"
project_id: "<project>"Get specific entity score:
Call MCP tool: harness_get
Parameters:
resource_type: "idp_score"
resource_id: "<entity_id>"Step 4: Check Documentation
Call MCP tool: harness_list
Parameters:
resource_type: "idp_tech_doc"
org_id: "<organization>"
project_id: "<project>"Step 5: Review Workflows
Call MCP tool: harness_list
Parameters:
resource_type: "idp_workflow"
org_id: "<organization>"
project_id: "<project>"Common Scorecard Categories
- Production Readiness - CI/CD, monitoring, alerting, runbooks
- Security Compliance - Vulnerability scanning, secrets management, access control
- Documentation - API docs, architecture diagrams, runbooks
- Operational Excellence - SLOs, incident response, on-call
- Developer Experience - Build times, test coverage, onboarding
Report Format
## Service Scorecard Report
**Service:** <name>
**Overall Score:** X/100
### Category Scores
| Category | Score | Status |
|----------|-------|--------|
| Production Readiness | 85/100 | Pass |
| Security | 70/100 | Needs Work |
| Documentation | 45/100 | Failing |
| Operations | 90/100 | Pass |
### Failing Checks
1. Missing API documentation
2. No SBOM generation configured
3. Test coverage below 80%
### Improvement Actions
1. Add API docs to /docs endpoint
2. Enable SBOM in CI pipeline
3. Increase test coverage to 80%+IDP Resource Types
| Resource Type | Operations | Description |
idp_entity | list, get | Catalog entities |
idp_score | list, get | Scorecard scores |
idp_tech_doc | list, get | Technical docs |
idp_workflow | list, get | IDP workflows |
Examples
- "How is api-gateway doing on scorecards?" - Get idp_score for entity
- "Which services are failing production readiness?" - List idp_score, filter by failing
- "Help me improve checkout-service score" - Get score, identify failing checks, suggest fixes
- "Show all services below 80% compliance" - List and filter idp_score
Performance Notes
- Analyze all scorecard checks before recommending improvements. Do not skip failing checks.
- Cross-reference failing checks with the service's actual configuration and documentation.
- Prioritize recommendations by impact — focus on checks that affect production readiness first.
Troubleshooting
No Scores Available
- Verify scorecards are configured in IDP settings
- Check entity is registered in the catalog
- Ensure data sources (CI/CD, monitoring) are connected
Scores Not Updating
- Check integration sync status
- Verify data source connectivity
- Review scorecard rule configuration
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- harness/harness-skills★ 12798% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/harness.mdcCursor rule
- analyze-costsSkill
- audit-reportSkill
- chaos-experimentSkill
- create-agentSkill
- create-agent-templateSkill
- create-connectorSkill
- create-environmentSkill
- create-infrastructureSkill
- create-pipelineSkill
- create-pipeline-v1Skill
- create-policySkill
- create-secretSkill
- create-serviceSkill
- create-templateSkill
- create-triggerSkill
- debug-pipelineSkill
- dora-metricsSkill
- gitops-statusSkill
- manage-delegatesSkill
- manage-feature-flagsSkill
- manage-rolesSkill
- manage-usersSkill
- migrate-pipelineSkill
- run-pipelineSkill
- security-reportSkill
- template-usageSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

