agentleFS
thiennc-tesoglobalthiennc-tesoglobal/flutter-skills/skills/flutter-notifications/SKILL.md

flutter-notifications

Skill16 starsChanged 2 months agoBSD-3-ClauseView on GitHub

Implement or repair Flutter local notifications and remote push delivery across permission, scheduling, token, lifecycle, payload, interaction, and reconciliation flows. Use for notification behavior; route ordinary API transport, navigation, persistence, and custom native bridge work to their specialists.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Flutter Notifications

Deliver notifications as a lifecycle, not as a single plugin call. Preserve the project's provider, notification package, architecture, and route ownership unless migration is explicitly requested.

Preflight

Read pubspec.yaml, SDK constraints, enabled platforms, native manifests and capabilities, and the complete existing notification/provider wiring before prescribing initialization, listeners, or native changes: initialization, listener registration, permission flow, service files, payload parsing, backend contract, route handoff, persistence, flavors, and tests. Identify the demonstrated gap and whether the task concerns local scheduling, remote push, or both. When repository evidence is unavailable, state that inspection is still required and keep proposed changes conditional instead of assuming the wiring is missing. Do not add Firebase, OneSignal, a local notification package, or a state-management package by default.

Establish one delivery contract

Define stable notification IDs, payload version/type, allowed fields, destination intent, deduplication key, timestamps, and fallback behavior for unknown or stale payloads. Notification payloads and logs must exclude secrets and sensitive user, message, health, payment, or authentication content; send opaque identifiers and fetch authorized domain data when needed. Treat a notification tap as untrusted external input: validate it before handing a typed intent to the app's navigation owner.

Model permission as user-controlled state. Ask in context after explaining value, distinguish not-determined, provisional, denied, and granted where the platform exposes them, and provide a useful disabled state. Never loop permission prompts or imply delivery is guaranteed.

Route the mode

  • For device-scheduled reminders, calendars, time zones, recurrence, cancellation, or reconciliation, read local notifications.
  • For provider registration, token lifecycle, foreground/background/terminated delivery, taps, or silent/data messages, read remote push notifications.
  • For Android/iOS/web constraints, permissions, capabilities, or device verification, read platform delivery.

Load only the references required by the current task.

Boundaries

  • flutter-networking owns ordinary backend transport and retry mechanics; this skill owns the notification registration and payload lifecycle contract.
  • flutter-persistence owns the storage implementation; this skill defines notification reconciliation and idempotency needs.
  • flutter-navigation owns route graphs and back-stack behavior; this skill produces a validated destination intent.
  • flutter-platform-integration owns a custom plugin or native bridge when the existing package cannot expose a required capability.
  • flutter-security owns a broader threat review; this skill still redacts payloads, tokens, and delivery telemetry by default.

Verification

Test deterministic contract, permission, schedule/reconcile, token-change, deduplication, and tap-routing logic without the platform plugin where possible. Then verify supported lifecycle paths on real platform surfaces: foreground, background, terminated launch, denied permission, restart, time-zone change when relevant, and malformed or duplicate payloads. Flutter widget/integration tests alone do not prove OS notification delivery.

Report the platforms and lifecycle states actually exercised, provider/backend dependencies, and remaining device-only gaps.

Sources

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.