full-feature
Skill4 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
End-to-end feature workflow — plan, scaffold, execute, verify, and merge, phase by phase.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- linjiejim/greenhousetheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- linjiejim/greenhouse★ 3same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository53 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- actionableSkill
- astro-bootstrapSkill
- astro-patternsSkill
- autopilotSkill
- axon-code-intelSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- commit-conventionsSkill
- cross-repo-contextSkill
- django-bootstrapSkill
- django-patternsSkill
- executeSkill
- find-sessionSkill
- flutter-bootstrapSkill
- flutter-patternsSkill
- intelSkill
- nextjs-bootstrapSkill
- nextjs-fullstack-bootstrapSkill
- nextjs-fullstack-patternsSkill
- nextjs-mui-bootstrapSkill
- nextjs-patternsSkill
- nextjs-shadcn-bootstrapSkill
- orchestratorSkill
- phase-breakdownSkill
- plan-and-scopeSkill
- prdSkill
- reactSkill
- recallSkill
- reflectSkill
- relaySkill
- rememberSkill
- scaffoldSkill
- scratchSkill
- tailwindSkill
- ux-specSkill
- ux-to-promptsSkill
- verify-astroSkill
- verify-djangoSkill
- verify-flutterSkill
- verify-nextjs-fullstackSkill
- verify-nextjs-muiSkill
- verify-nextjs-shadcnSkill
- verify-nextjsSkill
- verifySkill
- visual-feedbackSkill
- work-disciplineSkill
- worktreesSkill
- wrapSkill
- write-as-friendSkill
- write-as-humanSkill
- writing-clearlySkill
- writing-skillsSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
If the feature has a user-facing interface:
- Very specific: line 16
Run /prd to formalize requirements into a structured PRD
- Very specific: line 17
Run /ux-spec to design the experience through 6 UX passes (mental model, IA, affordances, cognitive load, state design, flow integrity)
- Very specific: line 21
Use the planner agent
- Distinctive: line 28
If this is a new project with sub-repos to create:
- Very specific: line 29
Use /scaffold from the root planning folder
- Distinctive: line 40
Start a Claude session in the sub-project
- Distinctive: line 45
Start a NEW Claude session in the same directory
- Distinctive: line 53
If this phase produced API changes, generate the integration summary for frontend phases
- Distinctive: line 64
Single feature: check out a branch, execute, review, PR, merge.
- Very specific: line 66
Multiple independent features in parallel: use git worktrees (see the /worktrees skill).
- Distinctive: line 69
Don't skip the planning step — it saves time overall
- Distinctive: line 70
Keep phases small enough to review in one sitting
- Distinctive: line 72
Update the plan as you learn — it's a living document
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Workflow: Full Feature
Overview
End-to-end workflow for implementing a feature from plan to merged code.
Steps
1. Product Definition (optional, for UI-heavy features)
If the feature has a user-facing interface:
- Run
/prdto formalize requirements into a structured PRD - Run
/ux-specto design the experience through 6 UX passes (mental model, IA, affordances, cognitive load, state design, flow integrity) - Skip this step for backend-only or technical features
2. Plan
- Use the
planneragent - Skills loaded:
plan-and-scope,phase-breakdown - The planner will consume PRD and UX spec artifacts if they exist
- Output:
plan.mdwith phased tasks - Review and iterate on the plan before proceeding
2b. Scaffold (new projects only)
If this is a new project with sub-repos to create:
- Use
/scaffoldfrom the root planning folder - Creates sub-project directories, git inits, installs profiles
- Skip this step for features in existing repos
3. Execute — MVP Build
For initial builds where you're taking a plan from zero to working application, work directly on main. No branches or worktrees needed — there's nothing to protect yet.
Repeat for each phase:
Execute:
- Start a Claude session in the sub-project
- Tell it: "Execute phase N of the plan"
- The executor agent reads plan.md and implements all tasks — it does not commit; changes stay uncommitted until verification passes
Review:
- Start a NEW Claude session in the same directory
- Tell it: "Review phase N against the plan"
- The reviewer agent checks the work and produces a verification report
- Fix any FAIL items, re-verify if needed
Commit and move on:
- On PASS, the review session commits the phase (implementation + verification report) to main — the session that owns the work commits (in the hands-off flows below, that's the lead)
- Between phases, the commit history provides a natural review point
- If this phase produced API changes, generate the integration summary for frontend phases
- Continue to the next phase
Hands-off alternatives:
/autopilot— for pre-planned work. Executes all plan.md phases: implement → test → verify → commit. Stops on FAIL — run/autopilot Nto resume./orchestrator— for broader work. Accepts inline tasks or plan.md, supports parallel execution, auto-phasing, and per-task model overrides. Use when tasks need decomposition or research.
4. Execute — Ongoing Feature Work
Once you have a working application and are building new features on top of it:
Single feature: check out a branch, execute, review, PR, merge. Simple.
Multiple independent features in parallel: use git worktrees (see the /worktrees skill). Each feature gets its own worktree so you can switch between them without stashing or losing context. This is where worktrees earn their keep.
Tips
- Don't skip the planning step — it saves time overall
- Keep phases small enough to review in one sitting
- The verification step catches things you'd miss in self-review
- Update the plan as you learn — it's a living document
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

