roadmap-management
Skill1 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when creating, updating, reviewing, or promoting Theseus roadmap items, including public roadmap notes, internal roadmap status maps, planning lanes, GitHub issue readiness, and OSS roadmap hygiene.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- insight68/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- akachandan1/proofstacktheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- Luis85/agentic-workflowtheir own version, first seen May 9, 2026
- ichuan/skillstheir own version, first seen Feb 3, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- insight68/Skills★ 5same name
- ichuan/skills★ 1same name
- akachandan1/proofstack★ 0same name
- Luis85/agentic-workflow★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-self-checkSkill
- biome-grit-rulesSkill
- biome-toolingSkill
- bun-testSkill
- bun-workspaceSkill
- cleanup-auditSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- dispatch-satelliteSkill
- docs-managementSkill
- docs-readingSkill
- effect-concurrency-lifecycleSkill
- effect-errors-schemaSkill
- effect-observability-timeSkill
- effect-services-layersSkill
- effect-testing-runtimeSkill
- effect-v4Skill
- jsx-md-authoringSkill
- monorepo-maintenanceSkill
- refactoring-disciplineSkill
- runtime-engineSkill
- server-runtimeSkill
- testing-patternsSkill
- theseus-designSkill
- tool-authoringSkill
- typescript-strictSkill
- ui-layout-disciplineSkill
- theseus-designSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
11
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Use this skill when roadmap or planning work changes what Theseus says it is building next.
- Very specific: line 24
If an item concerns implementation, verify against source before marking it shipped, active, or next.
- Very specific: line 34
Do not put loose ideation in the roadmap.
- Distinctive: line 39
Use one status per item:
- Very specific: line 50
Avoid future. It hides whether an item is designed, research, blocked, or parked.
- Distinctive: line 61
Do not promote directly from brainstorm to active.
- Very specific: line 62
Do not mark next without a done when test.
- Very specific: line 63
Do not mark active without an owner and evidence that work has started.
- Very specific: line 64
Do not mark shipped unless code, tests/checks, and docs agree.
- Very specific: line 65
When promoting or demoting, update roadmap-status-map.md in the same pass.
- Distinctive: line 69
Every roadmap-ready item needs:
- Very specific: line 78
If done when cannot be written, the item belongs in research, drafts, or brainstorms, not next.
- Very specific: line 85
Prefer Now / Next / Later / Not Planned over dates.
- Distinctive: line 88
Do not imply timelines unless the project intends to carry timeline pressure.
- Distinctive: line 89
Keep roadmap items tied to user-visible or contributor-visible value.
- Distinctive: line 93
After roadmap doc edits, run:
- Very specific: line 99
Use docs-management rules for links, frontmatter, folder placement, and status separation.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Theseus Roadmap Management
Use this skill when roadmap or planning work changes what Theseus says it is building next.
Roadmap work is status management, not aspiration capture. Keep current truth, planned work, research, and rejected paths separate.
Read Order
Start with:
docs/direction/roadmap.mddocs/maps/roadmap-status-map.mddocs/maps/runtime-truth-map.mddocs/maps/not-real-yet.md- the owning concept note for the roadmap item
If an item concerns implementation, verify against source before marking it
shipped, active, or next.
Roadmap Artifacts
docs/direction/roadmap.md: concise public-facing roadmap.docs/maps/roadmap-status-map.md: internal evidence table and promotion state.- GitHub issues: execution units only after the item is actionable.
- GitHub milestones/projects: sequencing containers, not doctrine.
Do not put loose ideation in the roadmap. Move it to docs/brainstorms or
docs/drafts first.
Status Vocabulary
Use one status per item:
shipped: implemented and verified.active: currently being built.next: intended soon and clear enough to plan.designed: accepted direction, not scheduled.research: needs investigation, prototype, or decision.blocked: dependency or unresolved decision is known.parked: not rejected, but not worth attention now.rejected: deliberately not doing.
Avoid future. It hides whether an item is designed, research, blocked, or
parked.
Promotion Pipeline
brainstorm -> draft -> designed -> next -> active -> shippedPromotion rules:
- Do not promote directly from brainstorm to active.
- Do not mark
nextwithout adone whentest. - Do not mark
activewithout an owner and evidence that work has started. - Do not mark
shippedunless code, tests/checks, and docs agree. - When promoting or demoting, update
roadmap-status-map.mdin the same pass.
Item Shape
Every roadmap-ready item needs:
- status
- owner
- source docs
- evidence or current implementation note
- dependency or blocker, if any
done whencriteria
If done when cannot be written, the item belongs in research, drafts, or
brainstorms, not next.
OSS Posture
For public docs:
- Prefer
Now / Next / Later / Not Plannedover dates. - Publish less than the internal status map knows.
- State non-promises explicitly.
- Do not imply timelines unless the project intends to carry timeline pressure.
- Keep roadmap items tied to user-visible or contributor-visible value.
Verification
After roadmap doc edits, run:
bun run docs:checkUse docs-management rules for links, frontmatter, folder placement, and
status separation.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

