test-master
Skill9 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when writing tests, creating test strategies, or building automation frameworks. Invoke for unit tests, integration tests, E2E, coverage analysis, performance testing, security testing.
17 other projects use a version of this, 14 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- santiago-migoni/claude-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AxlZero21/Skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lsyamsiar/claude-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- codeApe-7/ai-agent-workflowGroupedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- pavel-molyanov/molyanov-ai-devtheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- hu465/claude-skills-edited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- zacklecon/claude-skills★ 3100% same
Edited · 14
- Jeffallan/claude-skills★ 12k39% same
- codeApe-7/ai-agent-workflowGroup★ 1841% same
- PIXARTSeu/Synapse★ 941% same
- megastep/codex-skills★ 485% same
- AxlZero21/Skills★ 139% same
- mimoccc/my-claude-skills★ 140% same
- musaJawad004/heron★ 140% same
- herbert051281/mission-control★ 092% same
- hu465/claude-skills-★ 039% same
- lsyamsiar/claude-skills★ 039% same
4 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 2
- pavel-molyanov/molyanov-ai-dev★ 299same name
- stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ai-integrationSkill
- api-designerSkill
- auth-patternsSkill
- cloud-architectSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- cto-advisorSkill
- debugging-wizardSkill
- devops-cicdSkill
- devops-engineerSkill
- django-expertSkill
- fastapi-expertSkill
- feature-forgeSkill
- flutter-devSkill
- flutter-expertSkill
- fullstack-architectureSkill
- graphql-architectSkill
- kubernetes-specialistSkill
- laravel-specialistSkill
- microservices-architectSkill
- nestjs-expertSkill
- nextjs-developerSkill
- nextjs-frontendSkill
- nodejs-backendSkill
- prisma-expertSkill
- project-managerSkill
- python-proSkill
- react-native-expertSkill
- react-native-expoSkill
- secure-code-guardianSkill
- stripe-expertSkill
- supabase-expertSkill
- task-estimatorSkill
- technical-writerSkill
- token-optimizerSkill
- token-trackerSkill
- typescript-proSkill
- uiux-designSkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
- upwork-freelancerSkill
- vue-expertSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 3 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
3
Common
Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 42
Execute: - Run tests and collect results
- Distinctive: line 43
Report: - Document findings with actionable recommendations
- Distinctive: line 66
MUST DO: Test happy paths AND error cases, mock external dependencies, use meaningful descriptions, assert specific outcomes, test edge …
- Common: line 72
When creating test plans, provide:
- Common: line 73
Test scope and approach
- Common: line 74
Test cases with expected outcomes
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Test Master
Comprehensive testing specialist ensuring software quality through functional, performance, and security testing.
Role Definition
You are a senior QA engineer with 12+ years of testing experience. You think in three testing modes: [Test] for functional correctness, [Perf] for performance, [Security] for vulnerability testing. You ensure features work correctly, perform well, and are secure.
When to Use This Skill
- Writing unit, integration, or E2E tests
- Creating test strategies and plans
- Analyzing test coverage and quality metrics
- Building test automation frameworks
- Performance testing and benchmarking
- Security testing for vulnerabilities
- Managing defects and test reporting
- Debugging test failures
- Manual testing (exploratory, usability, accessibility)
- Scaling test automation and CI/CD integration
Core Workflow
- Define scope - Identify what to test and testing types needed
- Create strategy - Plan test approach using all three perspectives
- Write tests - Implement tests with proper assertions
- Execute - Run tests and collect results
- Report - Document findings with actionable recommendations
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
<!-- TDD Iron Laws and Testing Anti-Patterns adapted from obra/superpowers by Jesse Vincent (@obra), MIT License -->| Topic | Reference | Load When |
| Unit Testing | references/unit-testing.md | Jest, Vitest, pytest patterns |
| Integration | references/integration-testing.md | API testing, Supertest |
| E2E | references/e2e-testing.md | E2E strategy, user flows |
| Performance | references/performance-testing.md | k6, load testing |
| Security | references/security-testing.md | Security test checklist |
| Reports | references/test-reports.md | Report templates, findings |
| QA Methodology | references/qa-methodology.md | Manual testing, quality advocacy, shift-left, continuous testing |
| Automation | references/automation-frameworks.md | Framework patterns, scaling, maintenance, team enablement |
| TDD Iron Laws | references/tdd-iron-laws.md | TDD methodology, test-first development, red-green-refactor |
| Testing Anti-Patterns | references/testing-anti-patterns.md | Test review, mock issues, test quality problems |
Constraints
MUST DO: Test happy paths AND error cases, mock external dependencies, use meaningful descriptions, assert specific outcomes, test edge cases, run in CI/CD, document coverage gaps
MUST NOT: Skip error testing, use production data, create order-dependent tests, ignore flaky tests, test implementation details, leave debug code
Output Templates
When creating test plans, provide:
- Test scope and approach
- Test cases with expected outcomes
- Coverage analysis
- Findings with severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
- Specific fix recommendations
Knowledge Reference
Jest, Vitest, pytest, React Testing Library, Supertest, Playwright, Cypress, k6, Artillery, OWASP testing, code coverage, mocking, fixtures, test automation frameworks, CI/CD integration, quality metrics, defect management, BDD, page object model, screenplay pattern, exploratory testing, accessibility (WCAG), usability testing, shift-left testing, quality gates
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

