agentleFS
Sign inStart free
theopencotheopenco/llmgateway/.agents/skills/accessibility/SKILL.md

accessibility

Skill1.7k starsChanged 8 days agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.2 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".

  • Installs packages

123 other projects use a version of this, 32 of them edited; 1 new project in the last 4 weeks, against 3 the 4 before.

Adopted by

Cooling: 1 new project took it in the last 4 weeks, 0.3× the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 1 new projectWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 1 new projectWeek of Oct 4: 1 new projectWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 1 new project
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 4 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

Who's talking about theopenco/llmgateway

The biggest 5 of 31 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 31

Talked about on GitHub (31 times).

On GitHub · 31

26 more on GitHub

Used with

Projects with it also use author-contributions, tool-rename-deprecation and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • MicrosoftSkill

    author-contributions

    Identify all files a specific author contributed to on a branch vs its upstream, tracing code through renames. Use when asked who edited what, what code an author contributed, or to audit authorship before a merge. This skill should be run as a subagent — it performs many git operations and returns a concise table.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • gitpod-ioSkill

    tool-rename-deprecation

    Ensure renamed built-in tool references preserve backward compatibility. Use when renaming a toolReferenceName, tool set referenceName, or any tool identifier. Run on ANY change to tool registration code. Covers legacyToolReferenceFullNames for tools and legacyFullNames for tool sets.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • DepressionCenterSkill

    project-preferences

    Apply repository-specific preferences when planning, implementing, or reviewing changes in this project.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    chat-perf

    Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • DepressionCenterSkill

    create-media-pack

    Create a coordinated project branding and media pack with three accessible design options, approved vector artwork, image exports, a branding guide, and README integration. Use when asked for a repository media pack, brand kit, or complete project visual identity.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • +7 more from microsoft

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 106 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 106 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free