agentleFS
thematteroftimethematteroftime/agentic-md-for-dummies/.claude/skills/creator/SKILL.md

creator

Skill6 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when a user wants to bootstrap an experiment-orchestration skill for their own simulation framework. Captures their framework profile via 17 questions, then emits a tailored paper-to-experiment skill (templates, schema, registry, validator) into their .claude/skills/.

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions5 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 5

    1. marswaveai/skills★ 82same name
    2. arctan303/creator.skill★ 19same name
    3. CraftOS-dev/Agent-App★ 9same name
    4. Victorcorcos/skills★ 7same name
    5. tamld/defense-in-depth★ 4same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Inspect first, ask second: Read the user's project root before any question.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Don't invent fields: If a question's answer can't be inferred from the codebase, surface it.

    line 13
  3. Very specific:

    Skill output is text-only: No GPU, no simulations, no --apply to user files outside .claude/skills/<generated>/.

    line 14
  4. Distinctive:

    Generated skill must validate: Before handing off, dry-run the schema against one of the user's existing configs.

    line 15
  5. Very specific:

    Write the generated files to <user_project>/.claude/skills/paper-to-experiment-<framework>/.

    line 98
  6. Very specific:

    Run validate_config.py --strict (the generated one) against one of the user's existing approved configs.

    line 104

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Creator — meta-skill that builds experiment-orchestration skills

You are generating a skill that lives inside another project. The output is a working clone of paper-to-experiment adapted to that project's simulation framework.

Hard rules

  1. Inspect first, ask second. Read the user's project root before any question. Files >> their description.
  2. Don't invent fields. If a question's answer can't be inferred from the codebase, surface it; don't guess.
  3. Skill output is text-only. No GPU, no simulations, no --apply to user files outside .claude/skills/<generated>/.
  4. Generated skill must validate. Before handing off, dry-run the schema against one of the user's existing configs.
  5. Single source of class registry. Generated skill must point at one runtime registry (e.g. tools/registry.py), never at scattered references.
  6. AI only produces config; never executes. This contract is non-negotiable in every generated skill.

Process

1. Inspect repo  →  2. Interview (17 Q) →  3. Fill profile
                                              ↓
       6. Hand off  ←  5. Self-test  ←  4. Generate skill

Step 1 — Inspect repo

Read in order:

  • pyproject.toml / package.json / Cargo.toml (language + deps)
  • The user's main entry script (whatever runs a simulation)
  • One existing config file (the kind of artifact the new skill will produce)
  • docs/ for any README / architecture notes

Catalog: language, config format (JSON/YAML/TOML/Python), entry-script signature, output dir convention, existing analyzer/plotter classes.

Step 2 — Interview

Open templates/interview.md, ask the 17 questions in order. One question per turn. Multiple-choice when possible. Skip questions whose answers you already inferred — and say so ("from inspecting <file>, I'll assume X; correct?").

Step 3 — Fill profile

Save user answers + inspections to docs/specs/<TS>-<framework-name>-profile.md using templates/framework_profile.md as scaffold. This file is the input contract for skill generation.

Step 4 — Generate skill

For each {{X}} placeholder in templates/skill_scaffold/, substitute from the framework profile filled in Step 3.

Identity / structure (from §A):

TokenProfile field
{{FRAMEWORK_NAME}}A.1 framework_name
{{LANGUAGE_STACK}} / {{LANGUAGE_HINT}}A.2 language_stack
{{CONFIG_FORMAT}}A.3 config_format
{{ENTRY_SCRIPT}}A.4 entry_script
{{CONFIG_PATH_PATTERN}}derived from A.3 + project layout
{{CONFIG_PATH_EXAMPLE}}derived: e.g. configs/examples/<sample>.json
{{OUTPUT_DIR_CONVENTION}}A.5
{{TYPE_CONCEPT}}A.6 (e.g. force_type, model_type)
{{REGISTERED_TYPES}} (CSV) / {{REGISTERED_TYPES_JSON_ARRAY}}A.7
{{PRIMARY_FIELD}}F.1 (one-word domain label)

Schema / validation (from §C):

TokenProfile field
{{REGISTRY_PATH}}C.1 registry_path
{{VALIDATOR_PATH}}C.4 (or new: scripts/validate_config.py)
{{TYPE_REGISTRY_FILE}}derived: references/<type_concept>s.md
{{MAX_STEPS}}, {{MAX_STRIDE}}derived from B.4 + project max-N
{{DEFAULT_N}}from typical config in E.1
{{DEFAULT_THRESHOLD_VALUE}} / {{DEFAULT_<THRESHOLD_NAME>}}C.2 cross-field rules
{{TYPE1_LIMIT}} (and similar per-type limits)C.2 per-type ranges

Resource budgets (from §D):

TokenProfile field
{{HARDWARE_TARGET}}D.1
{{HARD_BUDGETS}} (summary string)D.2
{{WALL_BUDGET_HR}}D.2 wall
{{RAM_BUDGET_GB}}D.2 RAM
{{DISK_BUDGET_GB}}D.2 disk
{{ACCEL_BUDGET_GB}}D.2 accel
{{ACCEL_PER_N_BYTES}}, {{ACCEL_OVERHEAD_GB}}D.2 + B.4 calibration
{{FAST_RATE_SMALL}}, {{FAST_RATE_MID}}, {{FAST_RATE_LARGE}}B.4 step rate (fast mode, by N tier)
{{SLOW_RATE_SMALL}}, {{SLOW_RATE_LARGE}}B.4 step rate (slow mode, by N tier)

Defaults (from §A.7 + C):

TokenProfile field
{{DEFAULT_ANALYZER}}one of A.7 with "Analyzer" suffix
{{DEFAULT_AGGREGATOR}}one of A.7 with "Aggregator" suffix
{{ANALYZER_NAMING}}F.3

Write the generated files to <user_project>/.claude/skills/paper-to-experiment-<framework>/. Never overwrite an existing skill of the same name without explicit confirmation.

Self-check before handoff: grep the generated files for any remaining {{...}} tokens. If any survive, you missed a substitution — go back to Step 3 and add the missing profile field.

Step 5 — Self-test

Run validate_config.py --strict (the generated one) against one of the user's existing approved configs. Must exit 0. If it fails, fix the schema generation rule, regenerate, retry. Log failures into the profile §F (lessons captured for future iterations).

Step 6 — Hand off

Tell the user: where the skill is, what registry entries to add, the smoke-test command, and the contract file (SKILL.md) they'll iterate on.

Anti-patterns

ThoughtReality
"Just clone paper-to-experiment as-is"Their framework isn't ours. Profile-substitution is the whole point.
"Skip the interview, infer everything"One wrong inference rots downstream. Ask when unsure.
"Don't bother self-testing"Untested generation = handing the user a broken skill.
"AI runs simulations to verify"Out of scope — creator produces files, never burns compute.

Files

.claude/skills/creator/
├── SKILL.md                   # this file
├── templates/
│   ├── interview.md           # 17 questions (framework profile)
│   ├── framework_profile.md   # filled by creator + user
│   └── skill_scaffold/        # placeholder skill, copied + substituted
│       ├── SKILL.md.tmpl
│       ├── design.md.tmpl
│       ├── schema.json.tmpl
│       ├── registry.md.tmpl
│       └── validator.py.tmpl
└── references/
    ├── distillation.md        # what's framework-agnostic vs specific
    └── md_test1/              # this project as exemplar

End of skill.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.