principle-attack-the-premise
Skill2 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub
Apply when two or more fixes that share one premise have failed the same gate. Write the premise down and test it directly before you write another fix that assumes it.
41 other projects use a version of this, 38 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- B16B1RD/bb-writtheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- sammyjoyce/prime-pstackedited, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- upamune/skillsedited, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- mdsmithaustin/pstackedited, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- painhardcore/pstackedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- paramcodes/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use principle-explain-the-number, poteto-help and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ianclearySkillprinciple-explain-the-number
Apply before you trust, report, or act on a number you measured: a speedup, a regression, a throughput, a latency, or an eval result. Find what limits it, and rule out that it measured something other than the work you think.
Also in 29 projects that use this
ianclearySkillpoteto-help
Guides users through pstack setup, /poteto-mode, and picking the skill, playbook, or principle for a task. Type /poteto-help with a question.
Also in 14 projects that use this
tristanphvnSkillketchup-video
Catch the user up like /keel:ketchup, with a short silent video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /keel:ketchup-video.
Also in 10 projects that use this
bnemaSkillsetup-pstack
Configure which Pi models pstack uses per role. Detects available provider/model specs and writes pstack's user configuration. Use for /setup-pstack, "configure pstack models", or changing pstack model choices.
Also in 19 projects that use this
eryzerzSkillmake-bot-ui
Use when building a custom UI (page, dashboard, buttons) that should wake a Grok Bot over a webhook, when the user must provide a webhook sender key, or when exposing that UI on Tailscale.
Also in 15 projects that use this
TheOnlyFusionCubeSkillmaintain-formal-verification-skill
Bring a project's formal verification back in line with the code after the code changes: find the commits that touched verified code, update the model, harness, or properties to describe the code as it is now, rerun, and say whether each failure is drift in the verification or a bug in the code. Use for /maintain-formal-verification-skill, \"is the model still true to the code\", or after merges and refactors that touched verified code without rechecking it.
Also in 16 projects that use this
Other versions41 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 38
- backnotprop/pstack★ 3.8k80% same
- uzairansaruzi/p3-stack★ 12624% same
- dsebban/skills★ 7178% same
- TheOnlyFusionCube/potetos-for-everyone★ 2113% same
- creedants/pstack-t3★ 1882% same
- painhardcore/pstack★ 1882% same
- Scino/fstack★ 1824% same
- mariusflorescu/pstack-t3★ 1380% same
- adjohn/pstack★ 980% same
- mdsmithaustin/pstack★ 982% same
28 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 3
- jtaroreh/agystack★ 128same name
- requie/endostack★ 4same name
- B16B1RD/bb-writ★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-browserSkill
- animation-vocabularySkill
- apple-designSkill
- benchmark-checklistSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- emil-design-engSkill
- find-animation-opportunitiesSkill
- grillingSkill
- improve-animationsSkill
- improveSkill
- parallel-buildSkill
- pick-ui-librarySkill
- plan-executionSkill
- plan-handoffSkill
- portlessSkill
- principle-fix-root-causesSkill
- prototypeSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- review-animationsSkill
- shadcnSkill
- supabase-postgres-best-practicesSkill
- testingSkill
- unslopSkill
- vercel-react-best-practicesSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 2 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
2
Common
Most of the 40 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 8
When two or more fixes that share one premise have failed the same gate, suspect the premise, not the fixes.
- Distinctive: line 16
Remove the condition instead of compensating for it: If the evidence shows that one part always lands on the losing side, change what puts …
- Common: line 18
Stop: Do not start the next fix before the premise is written down and tested.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 40 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Attack the Premise
When two or more fixes that share one premise have failed the same gate, suspect the premise, not the fixes.
Why: Each failed fix is evidence against the belief it assumed. A third fix on the same premise spends effort where the evidence already says the cause is not.
Pattern:
- Write the premise down. The premise is the one sentence that every failed fix assumed.
- Test the premise before the next fix. Find an observation that would come out differently if the premise were false, and make it. Look at how the failures are distributed, not only at how large they are. Make the check rerunnable.
- Follow the evidence. If it contradicts the premise, the cause is elsewhere. Look for what the failures have in common that the premise did not predict. If it confirms the premise, ask the next "why" per Fix Root Causes. The earlier fixes may have treated a consequence instead of the cause.
- Remove the condition instead of compensating for it. If the evidence shows that one part always lands on the losing side, change what puts it there. A mechanism that cleans up after it leaves the cause in place and adds work on every run.
Stop: Do not start the next fix before the premise is written down and tested.
This principle questions a fact the current design assumes, rather than rebuilding the design around a new requirement.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

