Incident Response
Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Emergency response workflow for production issues
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/tta-dev.mdcCursor rule
- build-test-verifySkill
- core-conventionsSkill
- create-atomic-noteSkill
- create-pull-requestSkill
- git-commitSkill
- sdd-workflowSkill
- self-review-checklistSkill
- session-startSkill
- build-test-verifySkill
- core-conventionsSkill
- create-agentSkill
- create-atomic-noteSkill
- create-pull-requestSkill
- Feature DevelopmentSkill
- git-commitSkill
- Package ReleaseSkill
- sdd-workflowSkill
- self-review-checklistSkill
- session-startSkill
- ttadev-llmSkill
- ttadev-primitivesSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 44
Verify metrics return to normal
- Distinctive: line 52
Write incident report in Logseq
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Incident Response Skill
Overview
Emergency workflow for handling production incidents with DevOps Engineer and Observability Expert.
Duration: Variable (15 minutes - 2 hours) Personas Required: DevOps, Observability
Incident Workflow
Phase 1: Detect (@observability-expert)
Actions:
- Receive alert from monitoring
- Check Grafana dashboards
- Query Prometheus for metrics
- Assess impact and severity
Phase 2: Investigate (@devops-engineer + @observability-expert)
Actions:
- Review recent deployments
- Check application logs
- Analyze distributed traces
- Identify root cause
Phase 3: Mitigate (@devops-engineer)
Actions:
- Rollback deployment if needed
- Scale resources if capacity issue
- Apply hotfix if minor bug
- Notify stakeholders
Phase 4: Resolve (@devops-engineer)
Actions:
- Verify metrics return to normal
- Close alerts
- Monitor for 30 minutes
- Document actions
Phase 5: Postmortem (@observability-expert)
Actions:
- Write incident report in Logseq
- Identify preventive measures
- Update runbooks
- Share learnings with team
Success Criteria
- ✅ Incident detected <5 minutes
- ✅ Response initiated <10 minutes
- ✅ Service restored <1 hour
- ✅ Postmortem complete <24 hours
- ✅ Preventive measures implemented
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

