wp-agent-toolkit-demo
Skill1 starsChanged 33 days agoMITView on GitHub
Produces a repeatable demo script and acceptance checklist proving the POC works: connect, index, audit, similarity search, design system profile, patch apply.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- .cursor/rules/00-project-overview.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/10-architecture-and-safety.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/20-indexing-and-audit-contracts.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/30-mcp-implementation-guidelines.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/40-wp-introspection-guidelines.mdcCursor rule
- wp-agent-toolkit-bootstrapSkill
- wp-agent-toolkit-cursor-pluginSkill
- wp-agent-toolkit-design-bridgeSkill
- wp-agent-toolkit-mcp-serverSkill
- wp-agent-toolkit-orchestratorSkill
- wp-agent-toolkit-wp-helper-pluginSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Use when validating the POC or preparing a shareable Marketplace submission.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Demo & Acceptance (POC)
When to use
Use when validating the POC or preparing a shareable Marketplace submission.
Demo prompts (must include)
- "Do we already have a compact testimonial section? Where is it defined and used?"
- "Find all pages using a footer disclosure like
.footer-disclosure." - "Summarize the active theme design system tokens and helper functions."
- "If compact testimonial variant is missing, propose lowest-risk way to add it and show a diff."
Acceptance checklist
- Index builds and reports counts (blocks/patterns/templates/content).
- Component audit returns verdict + candidates + usage + variants.
- Similarity search returns grouped matches + confidence.
- Patch workflow shows diff and can apply safely (optional).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.