enter-issue
Skill110 starsChanged 6 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create a GitHub issue from screenshots, images, text descriptions, or any combination. Use this when the user wants to file a new issue or report a bug.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- thefrederiksen/cc-directorword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- thefrederiksen/cc-director★ 110100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-expertSkill
- cc-settings-apiSkill
- cencon-generateSkill
- code-maintenanceSkill
- commitSkill
- dead-code-finderSkill
- deploy-hosted-gatewaySkill
- developer-agentSkill
- dev-throttleSkill
- document-featuresSkill
- fleet-commsSkill
- implementation-loopSkill
- move-sessionSkill
- playwright-cliSkill
- product-agentSkill
- qa-agentSkill
- read-issuesSkill
- release-managerSkill
- review-codeSkill
- shipSkill
- skill-managerSkill
- support-agentSkill
- terminologySkill
- test-managerSkill
- ui-testSkill
- update-docsSkill
- voice-reviewSkill
- warning-fixerSkill
- wingman-brief-reviewerSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Create a new GitHub issue based on the user's input.
- Very specific: line 17
Read any text description or title provided in $ARGUMENTS
- Distinctive: line 18
If the user has provided screenshot paths or image paths, read them using the Read tool to understand their content
- Distinctive: line 22
If no title is provided, derive one from the description/images
- Distinctive: line 25
If the description is vague, use AskUserQuestion to clarify:
- Distinctive: line 30
If the user provided enough information, proceed without asking
- Distinctive: line 33
If images/screenshots were provided, they need to be included in the issue
- Very specific: line 34
Use gh issue create which supports image references in markdown
- Very specific: line 39
Check available labels: gh label list
- Distinctive: line 41
If no matching labels exist, create them if appropriate
- Very specific: line 76
Always use gh CLI for GitHub operations
- Distinctive: line 77
Use a HEREDOC for the body to preserve formatting:
- Distinctive: line 85
If images were provided, mention that they should be manually attached via the GitHub web UI if CLI upload is not possible, and provide the …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Create GitHub Issue
Create a new GitHub issue based on the user's input. The input may include screenshots, images, text descriptions, error logs, or any combination.
Input: $ARGUMENTS
Instructions
- Gather context from the user's input:
- Read any text description or title provided in
$ARGUMENTS - If the user has provided screenshot paths or image paths, read them using the Read tool to understand their content
- Common screenshot locations to check if referenced:
%USERPROFILE%\Pictures\Screenshots%OneDrive%\Pictures\Screenshots
- If no title is provided, derive one from the description/images
- Read any text description or title provided in
- Collect additional information if needed:
- If the description is vague, use AskUserQuestion to clarify:
- What is the expected behavior?
- What is the actual behavior?
- Steps to reproduce?
- Priority/severity?
- If the user provided enough information, proceed without asking
- If the description is vague, use AskUserQuestion to clarify:
- Upload images to the issue:
- If images/screenshots were provided, they need to be included in the issue
- Use
gh issue createwhich supports image references in markdown - For local images, upload them by referencing in the issue body — GitHub CLI handles image uploads when you use the web editor, so instead embed image paths as attachments
- Strategy: Create the issue first, then use
gh issue editto add images if needed, OR reference images inline
- Determine labels:
- Check available labels:
gh label list - Apply appropriate labels (bug, enhancement, documentation, etc.)
- If no matching labels exist, create them if appropriate
- Check available labels:
- Create the issue using GitHub CLI:
gh issue create --title "TITLE" --body "BODY" --label "LABELS"- Title: Clear, concise, imperative form (e.g., "Fix crash when opening settings")
- Body format:
## Description [Clear description of the issue] ## Screenshots [Any attached images] ## Steps to Reproduce (if bug) 1. Step one 2. Step two ## Expected Behavior [What should happen] ## Actual Behavior [What actually happens] ## Additional Context [Any extra info, logs, environment details]
- Report back:
- Show the created issue URL
- Show the issue number
- Summarize what was created
Important Notes
- Always use
ghCLI for GitHub operations - Use a HEREDOC for the body to preserve formatting:
gh issue create --title "Title" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## Description ... EOF )" - If images were provided, mention that they should be manually attached via the GitHub web UI if CLI upload is not possible, and provide the issue URL for easy access
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

