agentleFS
thedaviddiasthedaviddias/skill-check/.agents/skills/tdd-methodoly-expert/SKILL.md

tdd-methodoly-expert

Skill188 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when implementing features or fixing bugs with strict Test-Driven Development (TDD). Activate for coding tasks that require new functionality, refactoring, or comprehensive test coverage, especially when the user mentions TDD or Test Driven Development.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

30 rules. About 0 are common, 30 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈30

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill for:

    line 18
  2. Distinctive:

    Do NOT use this skill for:

    line 25
  3. Distinctive:

    Test-Driven Development follows a strict three-phase cycle that must be repeated for every increment of functionality:

    line 32
  4. Distinctive:

    Test must be simple and focused on one behavior

    line 43
  5. Distinctive:

    Test name should clearly describe expected behavior

    line 44
  6. Distinctive:

    Test should be readable without looking at implementation

    line 45
  7. Distinctive:

    Write only enough code to pass the current test

    line 64
  8. Distinctive:

    Don't add features not required by tests

    line 65
  9. Distinctive:

    Verify: all tests still pass

    line 83
  10. Distinctive:

    Never refactor with failing tests

    line 87
  11. Distinctive:

    Run tests after each refactoring step

    line 89
  12. Distinctive:

    🔴 Red: Write failing test → Run → Verify failure

    line 121
  13. Distinctive:

    🟢 Green: Write minimal code → Run → Verify pass

    line 122
  14. Distinctive:

    Test coverage (presence of corresponding test files)

    line 180
  15. Distinctive:

    After completing a feature or module

    line 183
  16. Distinctive:

    When reviewing code quality

    line 185
  17. Distinctive:

    Test file existence and structure

    line 198
  18. Distinctive:

    Test case count and naming

    line 199
  19. Distinctive:

    Test size and complexity

    line 201
  20. Distinctive:

    Before committing new tests

    line 205
  21. Distinctive:

    When validating test quality

    line 206
  22. Distinctive:

    After writing a batch of tests

    line 208
  23. Distinctive:

    When onboarding new team members to TDD

    line 226
  24. Distinctive:

    When setting up TDD enforcement for the first time

    line 227
  25. Distinctive:

    When to reference: When explaining TDD concepts or resolving questions about methodology.

    line 242
  26. Distinctive:

    When to reference: When analyzing code quality or identifying non-TDD patterns.

    line 252
  27. Distinctive:

    Test structure patterns (AAA, Given-When-Then)

    line 263
  28. Distinctive:

    Test organization (fixtures, builders, object mothers)

    line 264
  29. Distinctive:

    Test doubles (stubs, mocks, fakes)

    line 266
  30. Distinctive:

    When to reference: When writing tests or improving test structure.

    line 271

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

TDD Methodology Expert

Enforce and reinforce Test-Driven Development (TDD) methodology throughout the software development process. This skill provides comprehensive guidance, automated validation, and continuous reinforcement of the Red-Green-Refactor cycle.

When to Use This Skill

This skill automatically activates when:

  • TDD is mentioned in CLAUDE.md or CLAUDE.local.md
  • TDD is referenced in project memory
  • The user explicitly requests TDD methodology
  • The user asks to write tests or implement features

Use this skill for:

  • Implementing new features using TDD
  • Refactoring existing code with test protection
  • Fixing bugs with test-first approach
  • Ensuring code quality through TDD discipline
  • Validating that TDD principles are being followed

Do NOT use this skill for:

  • Pure design discussions without implementation
  • Documentation-only tasks
  • Research or exploration tasks

Core TDD Methodology

Test-Driven Development follows a strict three-phase cycle that must be repeated for every increment of functionality:

🔴 Red Phase: Write a Failing Test

Always write the test before any production code.

  1. Write a test that expresses the desired behavior
  2. Run the test and verify it fails (for the right reason)
  3. Confirm the failure message indicates what's missing

Red Phase Principles:

  • Test must be simple and focused on one behavior
  • Test name should clearly describe expected behavior
  • Test should be readable without looking at implementation
  • Failure should be meaningful and guide implementation

Example Flow:

1. Write: test_should_calculate_total_with_tax()
2. Run: Test fails - "ShoppingCart has no attribute 'calculate_total'"
3. ✅ Ready for Green phase

🟢 Green Phase: Make the Test Pass

Write minimal code to make the failing test pass.

  1. Implement the simplest code that makes the test pass
  2. Run the test and verify it passes
  3. Run all tests to ensure nothing broke

Green Phase Principles:

  • Write only enough code to pass the current test
  • Don't add features not required by tests
  • It's okay to use shortcuts (you'll refactor later)
  • Focus on making it work, not making it perfect

Example Flow:

1. Implement: def calculate_total(self, tax_rate): ...
2. Run: Test passes ✅
3. Run all: All tests pass ✅
4. ✅ Ready for Refactor phase

🔵 Refactor Phase: Improve the Code

Clean up code while maintaining passing tests.

  1. Identify duplication, poor names, or structural issues
  2. Refactor incrementally, running tests after each change
  3. Verify all tests still pass
  4. Repeat until code is clean

Refactor Phase Principles:

  • Never refactor with failing tests
  • Make small, safe changes
  • Run tests after each refactoring step
  • Improve both production code and test code
  • Apply design patterns and best practices

Example Flow:

1. Identify: Duplicated tax calculation logic
2. Extract: Move to _calculate_tax() method
3. Run tests: All pass ✅
4. Improve: Better variable names
5. Run tests: All pass ✅
6. ✅ Commit and move to next feature

TDD Workflow Integration

Before Starting Any Code Task

Step 1: Understand the Requirement

  • Break down the task into small, testable behaviors
  • Identify the simplest test case to start with
  • State which TDD phase you're entering (Red)

Step 2: Plan the Test

  • Describe what test you're about to write
  • Explain what behavior it will verify
  • Confirm test will fail before implementation

During Implementation

Always follow this sequence:

  1. 🔴 Red: Write failing test → Run → Verify failure
  2. 🟢 Green: Write minimal code → Run → Verify pass
  3. 🔵 Refactor: Improve code → Run → Verify still passes
  4. Commit: Save working, tested, clean code
  5. Repeat: Next test for next behavior

Never skip phases or reverse the order.

Communicating TDD Progress

In every response involving code changes, explicitly state:

  • Current phase: Which phase you're in (Red/Green/Refactor)
  • Test status: Whether tests are passing or failing
  • Next steps: What comes next in the cycle

Example Communication:

🔴 RED PHASE: Writing a test for calculating order total with discounts.

Test: test_should_apply_percentage_discount_to_order_total()
Expected to fail because Order.apply_discount() doesn't exist yet.

[Test code here]

Running test... ❌ Fails as expected: "Order has no attribute 'apply_discount'"

🟢 GREEN PHASE: Implementing minimal code to pass the test...

[Implementation code here]

Running test... ✅ Passes!
Running all tests... ✅ All pass!

🔵 REFACTOR PHASE: Improving the discount calculation structure...

[Refactored code here]

Running all tests... ✅ All pass!
Ready to commit this increment.

Bundled Tools and Resources

Scripts

check_tdd_compliance.py

Analyzes code to detect TDD compliance issues and code smells that indicate test-after development.

Usage:

python scripts/check_tdd_compliance.py <path-to-code>

What it checks:

  • Nested conditionals (sign of poor TDD structure)
  • Long methods (TDD produces small, focused methods)
  • Complex boolean conditions (TDD encourages extraction)
  • Missing abstractions (type checking vs polymorphism)
  • Test coverage (presence of corresponding test files)

When to use:

  • After completing a feature or module
  • Before committing code
  • When reviewing code quality
  • During refactoring sessions

validate_tests.py

Validates that tests exist, are properly structured, and follow TDD patterns.

Usage:

python scripts/validate_tests.py <path-to-tests>

What it checks:

  • Test file existence and structure
  • Test case count and naming
  • Arrange-Act-Assert pattern adherence
  • Test size and complexity
  • Descriptive test names

When to use:

  • Before committing new tests
  • When validating test quality
  • During code review
  • After writing a batch of tests

setup_hooks.sh

Installs git hooks and Claude Code hooks to enforce TDD methodology automatically.

Usage:

bash scripts/setup_hooks.sh <project-directory>

What it installs:

  • Git pre-commit hook: Validates TDD compliance before commits
  • Claude user-prompt-submit hook: Injects TDD reminders into every interaction
  • Updates CLAUDE.md to document TDD requirement

When to use:

  • Once at project initialization
  • When onboarding new team members to TDD
  • When setting up TDD enforcement for the first time

References

Load these references when deeper understanding is needed:

tdd-principles.md

Comprehensive guide to TDD methodology including:

  • The Red-Green-Refactor cycle in detail
  • TDD philosophy and benefits
  • Best practices and common mistakes
  • TDD in different contexts (unit, integration, acceptance)
  • Measuring TDD effectiveness

When to reference: When explaining TDD concepts or resolving questions about methodology.

code-smells.md

Catalog of code smells that indicate test-after development:

  • High-severity smells (nested conditionals, long methods, god objects)
  • Medium-severity smells (type checking, duplication, primitive obsession)
  • Low-severity smells (magic numbers, long parameter lists)
  • Detection strategies and refactoring guidance

When to reference: When analyzing code quality or identifying non-TDD patterns.

Grep patterns for searching:

  • Nested conditionals: if.*:\s*\n\s+if
  • Long methods: Count lines between function definitions
  • Type checking: isinstance\(|typeof
  • God classes: Count methods per class

testing-patterns.md

Language-agnostic testing patterns and best practices:

  • Test structure patterns (AAA, Given-When-Then)
  • Test organization (fixtures, builders, object mothers)
  • Assertion patterns
  • Test doubles (stubs, mocks, fakes)
  • Parameterized testing
  • Exception testing
  • Test naming conventions

When to reference: When writing tests or improving test structure.

Assets

Hook Templates

Located in assets/hook-templates/:

  • pre-commit.sh: Git hook that runs TDD compliance checks before allowing commits
  • user-prompt-submit.sh: Claude Code hook that injects TDD reminders before every user prompt

These templates are used by setup_hooks.sh and can be customized for specific project needs.

Further reference

See references/tdd-reference.md for prompt-based validation and setup, TDD enforcement rules, common scenarios, workflow integration, troubleshooting, and summary.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.