tdd-methodoly-expert
Skill188 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when implementing features or fixing bugs with strict Test-Driven Development (TDD). Activate for coding tasks that require new functionality, refactoring, or comprehensive test coverage, especially when the user mentions TDD or Test Driven Development.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-browserSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- github-ghSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- template-skillSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
30 rules. About 0 are common, 30 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈30
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Use this skill for:
- Distinctive: line 25
Do NOT use this skill for:
- Distinctive: line 32
Test-Driven Development follows a strict three-phase cycle that must be repeated for every increment of functionality:
- Distinctive: line 43
Test must be simple and focused on one behavior
- Distinctive: line 44
Test name should clearly describe expected behavior
- Distinctive: line 45
Test should be readable without looking at implementation
- Distinctive: line 64
Write only enough code to pass the current test
- Distinctive: line 65
Don't add features not required by tests
- Distinctive: line 83
Verify: all tests still pass
- Distinctive: line 87
Never refactor with failing tests
- Distinctive: line 89
Run tests after each refactoring step
- Distinctive: line 121
🔴 Red: Write failing test → Run → Verify failure
- Distinctive: line 122
🟢 Green: Write minimal code → Run → Verify pass
- Distinctive: line 180
Test coverage (presence of corresponding test files)
- Distinctive: line 183
After completing a feature or module
- Distinctive: line 185
When reviewing code quality
- Distinctive: line 198
Test file existence and structure
- Distinctive: line 199
Test case count and naming
- Distinctive: line 201
Test size and complexity
- Distinctive: line 205
Before committing new tests
- Distinctive: line 206
When validating test quality
- Distinctive: line 208
After writing a batch of tests
- Distinctive: line 226
When onboarding new team members to TDD
- Distinctive: line 227
When setting up TDD enforcement for the first time
- Distinctive: line 242
When to reference: When explaining TDD concepts or resolving questions about methodology.
- Distinctive: line 252
When to reference: When analyzing code quality or identifying non-TDD patterns.
- Distinctive: line 263
Test structure patterns (AAA, Given-When-Then)
- Distinctive: line 264
Test organization (fixtures, builders, object mothers)
- Distinctive: line 266
Test doubles (stubs, mocks, fakes)
- Distinctive: line 271
When to reference: When writing tests or improving test structure.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
TDD Methodology Expert
Enforce and reinforce Test-Driven Development (TDD) methodology throughout the software development process. This skill provides comprehensive guidance, automated validation, and continuous reinforcement of the Red-Green-Refactor cycle.
When to Use This Skill
This skill automatically activates when:
- TDD is mentioned in
CLAUDE.mdorCLAUDE.local.md - TDD is referenced in project memory
- The user explicitly requests TDD methodology
- The user asks to write tests or implement features
Use this skill for:
- Implementing new features using TDD
- Refactoring existing code with test protection
- Fixing bugs with test-first approach
- Ensuring code quality through TDD discipline
- Validating that TDD principles are being followed
Do NOT use this skill for:
- Pure design discussions without implementation
- Documentation-only tasks
- Research or exploration tasks
Core TDD Methodology
Test-Driven Development follows a strict three-phase cycle that must be repeated for every increment of functionality:
🔴 Red Phase: Write a Failing Test
Always write the test before any production code.
- Write a test that expresses the desired behavior
- Run the test and verify it fails (for the right reason)
- Confirm the failure message indicates what's missing
Red Phase Principles:
- Test must be simple and focused on one behavior
- Test name should clearly describe expected behavior
- Test should be readable without looking at implementation
- Failure should be meaningful and guide implementation
Example Flow:
1. Write: test_should_calculate_total_with_tax()
2. Run: Test fails - "ShoppingCart has no attribute 'calculate_total'"
3. ✅ Ready for Green phase🟢 Green Phase: Make the Test Pass
Write minimal code to make the failing test pass.
- Implement the simplest code that makes the test pass
- Run the test and verify it passes
- Run all tests to ensure nothing broke
Green Phase Principles:
- Write only enough code to pass the current test
- Don't add features not required by tests
- It's okay to use shortcuts (you'll refactor later)
- Focus on making it work, not making it perfect
Example Flow:
1. Implement: def calculate_total(self, tax_rate): ...
2. Run: Test passes ✅
3. Run all: All tests pass ✅
4. ✅ Ready for Refactor phase🔵 Refactor Phase: Improve the Code
Clean up code while maintaining passing tests.
- Identify duplication, poor names, or structural issues
- Refactor incrementally, running tests after each change
- Verify all tests still pass
- Repeat until code is clean
Refactor Phase Principles:
- Never refactor with failing tests
- Make small, safe changes
- Run tests after each refactoring step
- Improve both production code and test code
- Apply design patterns and best practices
Example Flow:
1. Identify: Duplicated tax calculation logic
2. Extract: Move to _calculate_tax() method
3. Run tests: All pass ✅
4. Improve: Better variable names
5. Run tests: All pass ✅
6. ✅ Commit and move to next featureTDD Workflow Integration
Before Starting Any Code Task
Step 1: Understand the Requirement
- Break down the task into small, testable behaviors
- Identify the simplest test case to start with
- State which TDD phase you're entering (Red)
Step 2: Plan the Test
- Describe what test you're about to write
- Explain what behavior it will verify
- Confirm test will fail before implementation
During Implementation
Always follow this sequence:
- 🔴 Red: Write failing test → Run → Verify failure
- 🟢 Green: Write minimal code → Run → Verify pass
- 🔵 Refactor: Improve code → Run → Verify still passes
- Commit: Save working, tested, clean code
- Repeat: Next test for next behavior
Never skip phases or reverse the order.
Communicating TDD Progress
In every response involving code changes, explicitly state:
- Current phase: Which phase you're in (Red/Green/Refactor)
- Test status: Whether tests are passing or failing
- Next steps: What comes next in the cycle
Example Communication:
🔴 RED PHASE: Writing a test for calculating order total with discounts.
Test: test_should_apply_percentage_discount_to_order_total()
Expected to fail because Order.apply_discount() doesn't exist yet.
[Test code here]
Running test... ❌ Fails as expected: "Order has no attribute 'apply_discount'"
🟢 GREEN PHASE: Implementing minimal code to pass the test...
[Implementation code here]
Running test... ✅ Passes!
Running all tests... ✅ All pass!
🔵 REFACTOR PHASE: Improving the discount calculation structure...
[Refactored code here]
Running all tests... ✅ All pass!
Ready to commit this increment.Bundled Tools and Resources
Scripts
check_tdd_compliance.py
Analyzes code to detect TDD compliance issues and code smells that indicate test-after development.
Usage:
python scripts/check_tdd_compliance.py <path-to-code>What it checks:
- Nested conditionals (sign of poor TDD structure)
- Long methods (TDD produces small, focused methods)
- Complex boolean conditions (TDD encourages extraction)
- Missing abstractions (type checking vs polymorphism)
- Test coverage (presence of corresponding test files)
When to use:
- After completing a feature or module
- Before committing code
- When reviewing code quality
- During refactoring sessions
validate_tests.py
Validates that tests exist, are properly structured, and follow TDD patterns.
Usage:
python scripts/validate_tests.py <path-to-tests>What it checks:
- Test file existence and structure
- Test case count and naming
- Arrange-Act-Assert pattern adherence
- Test size and complexity
- Descriptive test names
When to use:
- Before committing new tests
- When validating test quality
- During code review
- After writing a batch of tests
setup_hooks.sh
Installs git hooks and Claude Code hooks to enforce TDD methodology automatically.
Usage:
bash scripts/setup_hooks.sh <project-directory>What it installs:
- Git pre-commit hook: Validates TDD compliance before commits
- Claude user-prompt-submit hook: Injects TDD reminders into every interaction
- Updates CLAUDE.md to document TDD requirement
When to use:
- Once at project initialization
- When onboarding new team members to TDD
- When setting up TDD enforcement for the first time
References
Load these references when deeper understanding is needed:
tdd-principles.md
Comprehensive guide to TDD methodology including:
- The Red-Green-Refactor cycle in detail
- TDD philosophy and benefits
- Best practices and common mistakes
- TDD in different contexts (unit, integration, acceptance)
- Measuring TDD effectiveness
When to reference: When explaining TDD concepts or resolving questions about methodology.
code-smells.md
Catalog of code smells that indicate test-after development:
- High-severity smells (nested conditionals, long methods, god objects)
- Medium-severity smells (type checking, duplication, primitive obsession)
- Low-severity smells (magic numbers, long parameter lists)
- Detection strategies and refactoring guidance
When to reference: When analyzing code quality or identifying non-TDD patterns.
Grep patterns for searching:
- Nested conditionals:
if.*:\s*\n\s+if - Long methods: Count lines between function definitions
- Type checking:
isinstance\(|typeof - God classes: Count methods per class
testing-patterns.md
Language-agnostic testing patterns and best practices:
- Test structure patterns (AAA, Given-When-Then)
- Test organization (fixtures, builders, object mothers)
- Assertion patterns
- Test doubles (stubs, mocks, fakes)
- Parameterized testing
- Exception testing
- Test naming conventions
When to reference: When writing tests or improving test structure.
Assets
Hook Templates
Located in assets/hook-templates/:
- pre-commit.sh: Git hook that runs TDD compliance checks before allowing commits
- user-prompt-submit.sh: Claude Code hook that injects TDD reminders before every user prompt
These templates are used by setup_hooks.sh and can be customized for specific project needs.
Further reference
See references/tdd-reference.md for prompt-based validation and setup, TDD enforcement rules, common scenarios, workflow integration, troubleshooting, and summary.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

