agentleFS
theamtheam/claude-dev-kit/skills/e2e-generate/SKILL.md

e2e-generate

Skill17 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Create or update end-to-end tests for a user-facing flow that changed, using whatever e2e framework the repo already uses. Use after implementing a user story that alters UI behavior, routing, forms, or API-driven views.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. manastalukdar/ai-devstudio★ 1same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write the scenarios: Every generated suite must cover realistic edge cases, not just the happy path:

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    No sleeps: use the framework's waiting primitives.

    line 29
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep test names descriptive of the user behavior, not the implementation.

    line 30

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

E2E Test Generation

When a user story changes user-facing behavior and the project already does e2e, an existing e2e test must be updated or a new one created before the story is done. This skill is framework-agnostic — it uses whatever e2e stack the consuming repo already has, and never introduces a new one unprompted.

Adaptive gate (see instructions/testing-standards.md): if the repo has no e2e setup, this is a recommendation, not a blocker — report "no e2e setup; recommend adding one" (and offer to, if the user wants), and do not scaffold a framework. Only treat missing e2e as a hard failure when gates.e2e is required in .claude/dev-kit.json.

Process

  1. Identify the affected flow(s) from the story's acceptance criteria and the diff: which pages, routes, forms, and roles are involved.
  2. Discover the project's e2e framework and conventions first — before writing anything. If .claude/dev-kit.json names a stack, instructions/stacks/<id>.md lists the frameworks common for it as a starting hint. Then look for the config and test tree of whatever the repo actually uses (e.g. playwright.config.* + e2e/, cypress.config.* + cypress/, a Selenium/WebDriver test project, *.feature files for Cucumber, etc.) and reuse its existing page objects, fixtures, helpers, and app/API seeding or stubbing. Follow them exactly; do not introduce a new pattern or framework when one exists. If the repo has no e2e setup at all, say so and propose one that fits the stack instead of scaffolding silently.
  3. Prefer updating an existing test for the flow over creating a parallel one.
  4. Write the scenarios. Every generated suite must cover realistic edge cases, not just the happy path:
    • Empty states
    • API failures and timeouts
    • Validation errors
    • Role/permission differences where applicable
    • Navigation and back-flow behavior where applicable
  5. Run the tests with the project's e2e command (check the consuming repo's CLAUDE.md; e.g. npx playwright test <file>, npx cypress run, or the repo's WebDriver test command). Related e2e tests must pass before PR creation.

Quality rules

  • Page Object Model: new pages get a page object; interactions go through it, not raw selectors in the test body.
  • Stable selectors: prefer test ids / accessible roles over CSS chains.
  • No sleeps: use the framework's waiting primitives.
  • Keep test names descriptive of the user behavior, not the implementation.
  • Preserve existing test names when updating a file.

Output

Report which flows are covered, which test files were added/updated, the run result, and any flow you could not cover (with the reason) — never silently skip a flow.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.