project-feedback
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Define and run a project's deterministic format, lint, typecheck, test, build, migration, E2E, startup, and test-data checks. Use when implementing an issue, preparing a pre-merge result, or recording unavailable verification.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- gsmlg-app/flutter-app-templatetheir own version, first seen Apr 12, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- gsmlg-app/flutter-app-template★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/vercel-react-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ai-sdkSkill
- anti-slopSkill
- architecture-auditSkill
- browseSkill
- cavemanSkill
- context-budgetSkill
- design-mdSkill
- e2e-testingSkill
- error-handlingSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- fresh-context-reviewSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- graph-memorySkill
- grill-meSkill
- listenSkill
- manual-qa-planSkill
- next-best-practicesSkill
- nextjs-app-router-patternsSkill
- prd-to-issuesSkill
- project-memorialSkill
- scrollcraftSkill
- sequential-afk-runnerSkill
- shadcnSkill
- tddSkill
- vercel-react-best-practicesSkill
- write-prdSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Use HARNESS-PROJECT-FEEDBACK.md as the global contract and project-local instructions as the command source of truth.
- Distinctive: line 18
Run fast checks for the changed surface.
- Distinctive: line 20
Run the full pre-merge sequence for the complete change.
- Very specific: line 22
Stop completion on any FAIL, including typecheck, tests, lint, and build.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Project Feedback
Use HARNESS-PROJECT-FEEDBACK.md as the global contract and project-local
instructions as the command source of truth.
Workflow
- Discover the repository's package manager, lockfile, project instructions, scripts, migration tooling, Playwright configuration, startup command, and deterministic test-data setup.
- Classify each check as applicable or unavailable before running it. Never
invent a command. An unknown command is
UNAVAILABLE, notPASS. - Run fast checks for the changed surface. Add affected migrations, build, E2E, startup, or test-data checks when the issue requires them.
- Run the full pre-merge sequence for the complete change.
- Capture complete command output, exit codes, and artifact locations.
- Stop completion on any
FAIL, including typecheck, tests, lint, and build. RecordBLOCKEDorUNAVAILABLEwith owner and residual risk.
Pipeline Selection
- Eligible heavy web projects use
pipeline-initand the reusable GitHub CI/Playwright/Vercel pipeline. - Tiny or local-only projects do not receive deployment infrastructure.
- Android/Gradle projects use only their repo-local Java 17/Gradle workflow;
never run
pipeline-init.
Result Shape
Return one row per applicable check containing name, command, cwd,
exit_code, result, and evidence. For unavailable checks also include
reason, substitute, owner, and residual_risk. A terse green summary is
not sufficient when full logs exist.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

