regulatory-variant-effect
Skill0 starsChanged 13 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Score a genomic variant's predicted effect on regulatory tracks -- gene expression (RNA-seq, CAGE, PROCAP), chromatin accessibility (ATAC, DNase), histone marks, transcription-factor binding, splicing, and 3D contact maps -- predict baseline regulatory activity across a genomic interval, or predict cell-type-specific expression patterns from genomic sequence. Use when interpreting a non-coding or regulatory variant, assessing regulatory evidence for or against a target, evaluating whether a variant disrupts a cis-regulatory element, or establishing baseline epigenomic context at a locus. Do not use for protein structure confidence (use protein-structure-confidence), protein-coding variant consequence (use sequence-annotation tools), genetic association and population constraint evidence (use target-genetic-evidence), or measured tissue-level or cell-type expression (use tissue-expression-profile or single-cell-expression).
- Reads credentials
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- GoogleCloudPlatform/LifeSciencesedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- GoogleCloudPlatform/LifeSciences★ 5798% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository43 other files it gives its agents.
- pharmakon-discovery-engineSkill
- admet-property-predictionSkill
- artifact-conventionsSkill
- binding-mode-analysisSkill
- bioactivity-landscapeSkill
- brain-atlasSkill
- citation-resolutionSkill
- citation-verificationSkill
- competitive-differentiationSkill
- compound-identity-resolutionSkill
- compound-property-profileSkill
- debate-protocolSkill
- disease-transcriptomicsSkill
- elo-tournamentSkill
- evolution-operatorsSkill
- hypex-tool-setupSkill
- hypothesis-entrySkill
- hypothesis-run-corpusSkill
- hypothesis-schemaSkill
- in-vivo-pk-analysisSkill
- literature-searchSkill
- manufacturing-feasibilitySkill
- meta-review-protocolSkill
- model-organism-phenotypeSkill
- pharmakon-discovery-engineSkill
- pkde-dashboardSkill
- pocket-druggabilitySkill
- preclinical-safety-assessmentSkill
- program-state-managementSkill
- protein-structure-confidenceSkill
- proximity-protocolSkill
- review-rubricSkill
- run-protocolSkill
- safety-screenSkill
- sar-series-analysisSkill
- single-cell-expressionSkill
- site-generationSkill
- stage1-gate-evaluationSkill
- structure-screeningSkill
- structure-similarity-searchSkill
- target-genetic-evidenceSkill
- tissue-expression-profileSkill
- tournament-corpusSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use this skill when you need to evaluate a variant's predicted regulatory impact or understand the baseline regulatory landscape at a locus.
- Very specific: line 78
Run pkde doctor before first use.
- Very specific: line 94
Run score-variant before analyze.
- Very specific: line 153
All output options: --json for machine-readable output, --quiet for paths only, --out to override the default output directory.
- Distinctive: line 199
When quantile scores are available, an extreme |quantile| paired with a negligible |raw_score| is a documented statistical artifact -- a …
- Very specific: line 231
All four relays are qualifiers -- they fire on defects or anomalies in the data.
- Very specific: line 249
Check mandatory_relays in both the .analysis.json and the .meta.json.
- Distinctive: line 254
Every analysis carries these advisories:
- Distinctive: line 263
When at least one block carries quantile scores, a fourth advisory is present: quantile scores are ranked against common variants, so a …
- Distinctive: line 283
Multiple output types: when several assays show concordant effects, state which are confirmed and which are unconfirmed.
- Very specific: line 323
Complementary evidence: use tissue-expression-profile for measured tissue-level expression (HPA data) and single-cell-expression for …
- Distinctive: line 329
Wording constraint: never say a gene "is expressed" based on predict-interval output.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
1. When to use, and when not
Use this skill when you need to evaluate a variant's predicted regulatory impact or understand the baseline regulatory landscape at a locus. Entry points include:
- Scoring a non-coding variant identified from GWAS, eQTL, or clinical sequencing to assess its regulatory effect across tissues and assays.
- Predicting baseline chromatin and expression tracks across an interval to establish regulatory context before variant interpretation.
- Performing in-silico mutagenesis to discover which positions in a regulatory element are functionally important (when available).
- Assessing whether a variant near a drug target's regulatory region might alter its expression -- relevant to target validation, on-target toxicity assessment, and pharmacogenomic risk.
- Predicting cell-type-specific expression from genomic sequence when
measured cell-type data is unavailable -- using
predict-interval --output-type RNA_SEQto access 667 RNA-seq tracks (271 positive-strand, 271 negative-strand, 125 unstranded) covering diverse cell types and conditions.
Do not use when:
- You need protein structure or fold confidence
->
protein-structure-confidence. - You need protein-coding variant consequence (missense, nonsense, frameshift) -> sequence annotation tools.
- You need population-level genetic constraint, loss-of-function
intolerance, or disease association ->
target-genetic-evidence. - You need to interpret a variant's effect on protein function or stability -> protein-level tools.
- You need measured tissue-level expression
->
tissue-expression-profile. AlphaGenome predicts expression from genomic features; tissue-expression-profile reports measured RNA from HPA. - You need measured cell-type-resolved expression data
->
single-cell-expression. It discovers datasets; AlphaGenome predicts from sequence.
2. Preconditions
- Variant input: chromosome (e.g.
chr17), 1-based position, reference base(s), and alternate base(s). The CLI centres a context window on the variant; you do not supply an interval. - Window: defaults to 131072 bp. Snapped to the nearest of {16384, 131072, 524288, 1048576} because the model rejects any other length. The window size changes the gene set and scores -- see Section 4.
- Interval input (for
predict-interval): genomic coordinates inchrN:start-endformat. Length must be exactly one of the valid windows. - Scorer: defaults to
geneMask. Options: geneMask, geneMaskActive, geneMaskSplicing, centerMask, paQtl, spliceJunction, contactMap. Three scorers -- paQtl, spliceJunction, contactMap -- are fieldless: the endpoint proto declares no output-type field for them, so each answers for one fixed modality. If you pass--output-typewith a fieldless scorer, the CLI drops the flag and records a warning in the sidecar explaining that the result is not the modality you requested. geneMaskSplicing accepts only SPLICE_SITES and SPLICE_SITE_USAGE; any other output type is refused. - Output type: defaults to CAGE. Repeatable. One or more of: ATAC, CAGE, DNASE, RNA_SEQ, CHIP_HISTONE, CHIP_TF, SPLICE_SITES, SPLICE_SITE_USAGE, SPLICE_JUNCTIONS, CONTACT_MAPS, PROCAP. Large multi-type requests risk gateway 502s; split if needed. Not applicable to the three fieldless scorers above.
- Strand: required by the endpoint. Defaults to STRAND_POSITIVE. STRAND_UNSPECIFIED is rejected. Its effect on gene-level scores has not been characterised; strand handling is driven by gene metadata.
- Backend (
score-variantonly):cloud(default, cloud auth) orpip(requiresALPHAGENOME_API_KEY; raises immediately -- the pip path is not implemented). - Organism: defaults to
HOMO_SAPIENS. Also supportsMUS_MUSCULUS. - Run
pkde doctorbefore first use. It ends with a verdict line:STOPmeans fix or report before running anything;PROCEEDmeans work, and the grouped warnings tell you which commands would refuse, which results need careful reading, and which are the tooling lead's to clear. Do not judge by the warning count; the verdict line grades them for you.
3. Tool invocations
Variant scoring
| Question | Run | Writes to |
| What is this variant's regulatory effect? | pkde alphagenome score-variant --chrom <C> --pos <P> --ref <R> --alt <A> [--window <W>] [--scorer <S>] [--output-type <T>...] | raw/genomics/<chrom>-<pos>-<ref>-<alt>.scores.json<br>raw/genomics/<chrom>-<pos>-<ref>-<alt>.response.ndjson<br>raw/genomics/<chrom>-<pos>-<ref>-<alt>.request.json<br>raw/genomics/<chrom>-<pos>-<ref>-<alt>.meta.json |
| How strong is the effect? | pkde alphagenome analyze <SCORES_PATH> [--quantile-significance <V>] | raw/genomics/<chrom>-<pos>-<ref>-<alt>.analysis.json |
Run score-variant before analyze. analyze reads the stored
.scores.json and applies the alphagenome-variant-effect threshold
set. It can be re-run with different thresholds without re-querying.
The .scores.json contains blocks: [...], one block per output type
or per scorer (fieldless scorers like paQtl are labelled SCORER_paQtl
rather than by output type, since neither request nor response names
one). Each block carries its own gene list, quantile availability, and
strand masking statistics. The .response.ndjson preserves the raw
endpoint response so the decoding can be re-checked without another
call.
Baseline interval prediction
| Question | Run | Writes to |
| What is the predicted regulatory activity across this interval? | pkde alphagenome predict-interval --interval <I> --strand <S> [--output-type <T>...] | raw/genomics/<chrom>-<start>-<end>.tracks.json<br>raw/genomics/<chrom>-<start>-<end>.tracks.npz<br>raw/genomics/<chrom>-<start>-<end>.tracks.response.ndjson<br>raw/genomics/<chrom>-<start>-<end>.tracks.request.json<br>raw/genomics/<chrom>-<start>-<end>.tracks.meta.json |
The tensor is stored as .npz (compressed NumPy). The .tracks.json
index carries track metadata and references the .npz; open the index
first.
Cell-type expression prediction
pkde alphagenome predict-interval --interval <I> --strand <S> --output-type RNA_SEQWhat it returns: a [positions x tracks] tensor across 667 RNA-seq
tracks. Track metadata in the .tracks.json index names each track
(cell type, tissue, condition, strand). The .npz holds the numerical
tensor.
Track structure: 271 positive-strand tracks, 271 negative-strand
tracks, 125 unstranded tracks. The track names in track_metadata
identify cell types and conditions (e.g. specific cell lines, primary
cells, tissue samples).
How to identify relevant tracks: open the .tracks.json index and
inspect track_metadata. Each track entry includes a name field.
Filter for tracks whose names match the cell type, tissue, or condition
of interest.
Strand handling: a single RNA_SEQ call returns all 667 tracks across
both strands. A gene on the negative strand will have signal on
negative-strand tracks. When interpreting results for a specific gene,
attend to tracks matching the gene's strand plus the 125 unstranded
tracks. The --strand flag sets the interval's strand for the request,
not a filter on the returned tracks.
In-silico mutagenesis (ISM)
| Question | Run | Writes to |
| Which positions in this element are functionally important? | pkde alphagenome ism --interval <I> | Not yet implemented -- requires ALPHAGENOME_API_KEY (pip backend only). |
| What motifs does the ISM scan reveal? | pkde alphagenome analyze-ism <ARTIFACT> | Blocked -- the alphagenome-ism threshold set has unresolved cutoffs with no cited source. |
ISM is not available for planning.
All output options: --json for machine-readable output, --quiet for
paths only, --out to override the default output directory.
4. Interpretation contract
Per-block verdicts and the confirmed/unconfirmed split
Results are per block -- one block per output type, or one per fieldless scorer. Each block carries its own verdict. Whether a quantile significance test was applied depends on the output type, not the scorer: RNA_SEQ returns a signed quantile plane, while CAGE, ATAC, DNASE, and PROCAP do not.
This creates two categories of verdict that are different instruments, not stronger and weaker versions of the same call:
When quantile scores are available (e.g. RNA_SEQ):
- moderate_magnitude_confirmed / strong_magnitude_confirmed -- the magnitude band is supported by the quantile test.
- The guide's artifact rule (high quantile + low raw) is applied and flagged genes are excluded.
When quantile scores are not available (e.g. CAGE, ATAC):
- moderate_magnitude_unconfirmed / strong_magnitude_unconfirmed -- an untested magnitude. This is not weaker evidence of the same kind; it is a magnitude reading from an instrument that provides no significance test on this path. Do not describe it as "significant."
Both paths share:
- no_effect_by_magnitude / subtle_by_magnitude -- below the relevant threshold regardless of quantile availability.
- no_scores -- no genes were scored. The cause is uncharacterised; do not assume a specific reason.
Overall verdict
The overall verdict is the strongest per-block verdict, and
verdict_from in the analysis names which output type it came from.
The finding must state the assay, because "strong" from RNA_SEQ
(confirmed) and "strong" from CAGE (unconfirmed) are not the same
claim.
The quantile artifact trap
When quantile scores are available, an extreme |quantile| paired with a
negligible |raw_score| is a documented statistical artifact -- a
rank against a flat background in a low-expression gene, not a molecular
effect. The analysis flags these and the quantile_artifact relay
requires excluding them from the effect list entirely, not merely
disclosing them. Reporting a negligible raw score as a top-percentile
regulatory effect inverts the finding.
Strand masking and track counts
A gene is scored only on tracks of its own strand plus any unstranded
ones, so much of a score_variant tensor is NaN by design. The fraction
varies by output type and scorer -- CAGE masks about half (273 of 546),
RNA_SEQ about 40% (396 of 667, because it has 125 unstranded tracks
scored for every gene), and paQtl masks none. Never infer the fraction;
quote n_tracks_scored per gene from the artifact. A finding that says
"across 546 tracks" on CAGE when 273 carry values overstates the
evidence by 2x.
Window sensitivity
The gene set and the scores are properties of the context window, not of the variant alone. The same variant scored at different window sizes produces different gene lists and different magnitudes. A finding that names genes without naming the window is not reproducible. Always report the window size alongside any gene list or score.
Mandatory relays
The following relay codes mark obligations on the finding. Each must be satisfied -- not merely disclosed -- in any Layer 1 finding.
All four relays are qualifiers -- they fire on defects or anomalies in the data. A clean variant-effect prediction (RNA_SEQ output type, quantile scores available, no missing-score anomaly, no artifact flag) produces zero relays. That is not a clean bill of health -- it means no defect was found. Nothing has been said about whether a large predicted effect constitutes pathogenicity or causality. A variant effect score is a prediction of regulatory impact on gene expression; reading it as clinical pathogenicity or as evidence of causal mechanism is a substitution the tool cannot guard against because no relay fires on the impressive result.
| Relay code | Kind | Fires when | Obligation | ||||
alphagenome.no_quantile_scores | Qualifier | Blocks whose output type returns no quantile (conditional -- names the specific types) | Do not call any effect significant on raw score alone. The significance rule the interpretation guide defines could not be applied to the named output types. | ||||
alphagenome.band_modality_mismatch | Qualifier | Any call not using --output-type RNA_SEQ (standing) | State the assay the score came from alongside any magnitude word. The bands are RNA-seq-derived, so "moderate" on a CAGE or ATAC track is an extrapolation, not a calibrated call. | ||||
alphagenome.unexplained_missing_scores | Qualifier | Only when NaN pattern violates the strand rule (anomaly) | Report the scored-track count, not the track total, and say that some tracks went unscored for reasons the tool could not explain. Do not aggregate over the full track set. | ||||
alphagenome.quantile_artifact | Qualifier | Only when | quantile | exceeds the configured quantile_significance threshold while | raw | stays below the artifact_raw_ceiling | Exclude the flagged genes from the effect list entirely. An extreme quantile on a negligible raw score is a rank against a flat background; reporting it as a top-percentile effect inverts the finding. |
Check mandatory_relays in both the .analysis.json and the
.meta.json. Every relay code present must be satisfied in the finding.
Mandatory advisories
Every analysis carries these advisories:
- Raw-score magnitude bands are rules of thumb derived primarily from RNA-seq and are not absolute; interpretation depends on modality and assay type.
- Raw scores are not percentages and must not be reported as such.
- AlphaGenome does not model miRNA effects, RNA secondary structure, protein folding consequences, or developmental timing.
When at least one block carries quantile scores, a fourth advisory is present: quantile scores are ranked against common variants, so a variant in a low-expression region can score a high quantile without biological significance.
Consequence rules
- Confirmed effect (quantile-tested): state the assay, the window, and the per-gene scored-track count. This is the strongest regulatory evidence this tool provides.
- Unconfirmed magnitude: state clearly that this is a magnitude reading, not a significance call. Name the output type and the limitation.
- Quantile artifacts: exclude entirely. Do not list them as effects with a caveat.
- Effect on splicing tracks: a predicted splice-site or junction change warrants separate assessment of protein-level consequences. This skill does not predict protein-level impact.
- No effect by magnitude: report the null result; it is evidence within the scope of the window tested.
- Multiple output types: when several assays show concordant effects, state which are confirmed and which are unconfirmed. Do not average across output types.
Cross-disciplinary consequences
- A variant with a strong confirmed effect on a drug target's expression is material to pharmacogenomic risk regardless of which specialist discovered it.
- A regulatory variant in a safety-gene's promoter is relevant to toxicology even when discovered during target validation.
- Regulatory evidence complements but does not replace genetic association evidence from population studies.
What this section produces
Following this contract produces a Layer 1 finding in findings/ that
cites the .analysis.json, satisfies all mandatory relays, states the
window size, names the assay for every verdict, and distinguishes
confirmed from unconfirmed results. Everything the tools emitted stays
under raw/genomics/.
Thresholds are cited by name (e.g. "the configured
quantile_significance threshold"), never by value.
Predicted vs measured expression
AlphaGenome predicts expression from genomic sequence features (regulatory elements, promoter structure, enhancer patterns). It does not measure RNA.
A prediction that a gene shows signal on sensory neuron RNA-seq tracks is evidence of sequence-level regulatory potential in that cell type, not a measurement of actual expression. This distinction matters because: (a) predictions can be wrong -- the model may miss post-transcriptional regulation, chromatin state, or environmental factors; (b) predictions cannot capture dynamic or condition-dependent expression changes that are not encoded in the reference genome sequence.
Complementary evidence: use tissue-expression-profile for measured
tissue-level expression (HPA data) and single-cell-expression for
discovering measured single-cell datasets. AlphaGenome predictions add
value where measured cell-type data does not exist -- they extend the
evidence map, not replace it.
Wording constraint: never say a gene "is expressed" based on predict-interval output. Say "is predicted to show expression signal" or "shows predicted regulatory potential for expression." The verb "expressed" implies measurement.
5. Failure modes and anti-fabrication guard
Do not compute these values yourself. The value is whatever the tool emitted. If the tool did not run, there is no value. If a required tool is unavailable, report the task as blocked. Do not estimate, and do not proceed on an assumed result.
Named pathologies
- Calling an unconfirmed magnitude "significant." An
_unconfirmedverdict means no significance test was performed, not that the test was performed and passed. Describing it as "a significant regulatory effect" misrepresents the evidence. - Treating confirmed and unconfirmed as the same instrument. A
strong_magnitude_confirmedresult from RNA_SEQ and astrong_magnitude_unconfirmedresult from CAGE are not the same claim. The finding must name the assay and the suffix. - Reporting a quantile artifact as an effect. An extreme quantile on a negligible raw score is a ranking artifact. The obligation is to exclude the gene entirely, not to disclose it with a caveat. Reporting it inverts the finding.
- Reporting raw scores as percentages. Raw scores are continuous values on an unbounded scale, not percentages.
- Quoting the track total instead of the scored count. Much of the
tensor is NaN by design (strand masking), and the fraction varies by
output type and scorer. The per-gene
n_tracks_scoredis the number to quote. - Omitting the window from a gene list. The gene set is a property of the request. A different window returns different genes and different scores. Without the window, the finding is not reproducible.
- Saying "moderate" on CAGE without naming the modality. The
magnitude bands are calibrated against RNA-seq. Applying them to
other assays is an extrapolation. The
band_modality_mismatchrelay requires stating the assay. - Attributing a contactMap score to a gene. contactMap scores the
whole interval, not individual genes. Its row is named for the
interval and marked
interval_level. No gene in that interval owns the number. - Interpreting a null result as "no regulatory role." AlphaGenome predicts effects on the tracks it models. Absence of a predicted effect is not evidence of no regulatory function.
- Endpoint 502 misread as null result. Since the scale-to-zero fix,
a persistent 502 is more often a rejected request than an outage:
missing organism, unset interval strand, an interval length not in
{16384, 131072, 524288, 1048576}, too many output types in one call,
or CHIP_HISTONE / CHIP_TF output types whose response exceeds a
gateway size limit and has never returned successfully at any window.
The CLI warns to stderr before attempting these types. Unlike the
other four causes (instant rejections), the gateway size failure
consumes the full retry budget by default; use
--deadlineto shorten the wait. Check the request before retrying. - ISM with invented thresholds. The
alphagenome-ismthreshold set has unresolved cutoffs. The CLI will refuse to produce a verdict.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

