agentleFS
termio-shtermio-sh/termio/skills/swiftui-performance-audit/SKILL.md

performance-audit

Skill787 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Audit and improve SwiftUI runtime performance. Use for requests to diagnose slow rendering, janky scrolling, high CPU/memory usage, excessive view updates, or layout thrash in SwiftUI apps.

20 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use incident-response, threat-model and 7 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • AnthropicSkill

    incident-response

    Run an incident response workflow — triage, communicate, and write postmortem. Trigger with "we have an incident", "production is down", an alert that needs severity assessment, a status update mid-incident, or when writing a blameless postmortem after resolution.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    threat-model

    Use when Codex is already in the threat-modeling phase of a security scan, the user explicitly invokes $threat-model, or the user explicitly asks to create, update, or persist a repository threat model. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • CloudflareSkill

    security-audit

    Security guidance and vulnerability review for codebases, APIs, services, CLI tools, libraries, and daemons. Use for security questions, focused reviews, vulnerability research, security audits, or pen tests. Run the complete workflow only for explicit codebase audit or pen-test requests, full/comprehensive/end-to-end reviews, or requested report artifacts.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    write-tests

    Write tests following project conventions. Use when adding new tests or modifying existing ones.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    api-design

    Guide for designing and documenting RESTful APIs. Use when asked to design an API, create endpoints, or document an API.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    security-review

    Finds exploitable application security vulnerabilities in code changes. Use for Warden security scans, appsec review, OWASP-style checks, authentication or authorization bugs, injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, secrets, unsafe crypto, webhook verification, open redirects, or sensitive data exposure.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If user provides code: Start with Code-First Review

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    If user only describes symptoms: Ask for minimal code/context, then Code-First Review

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    If code review is inconclusive, explain how to collect data:

    line 40
  4. Distinctive:

    Use SwiftUI template in Instruments (Release build)

    line 42
  5. Distinctive:

    Ask user to re-run same capture and compare with baseline:

    line 173

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

SwiftUI Performance Audit

Overview

Audit SwiftUI view performance from instrumentation and baselining to root-cause analysis and concrete remediation steps.

Workflow Decision Tree

  1. If user provides code: Start with Code-First Review
  2. If user only describes symptoms: Ask for minimal code/context, then Code-First Review
  3. If code review is inconclusive: Guide user to profile with Instruments

1. Code-First Review

Collect

  • Target view/feature code
  • Data flow: state, environment, observable models
  • Symptoms and reproduction steps

Focus On

  • View invalidation storms from broad state changes
  • Unstable identity in lists (id churn, UUID() per render)
  • Heavy work in body (formatting, sorting, image decoding)
  • Layout thrash (deep stacks, GeometryReader, preference chains)
  • Large images without downsampling
  • Over-animated hierarchies (implicit animations on large trees)

Provide

  • Likely root causes with code references
  • Suggested fixes and refactors
  • Minimal repro or instrumentation suggestion if needed

2. Guide User to Profile

If code review is inconclusive, explain how to collect data:

  1. Use SwiftUI template in Instruments (Release build)
  2. Reproduce the exact interaction (scroll, navigation, animation)
  3. Capture SwiftUI timeline and Time Profiler
  4. Export or screenshot relevant lanes and call tree

Ask for:

  • Trace export or screenshots
  • Device/OS/build configuration

3. Common Code Smells (and Fixes)

Expensive formatters in body

Bad:

var body: some View {
    let formatter = NumberFormatter()  // Slow allocation every render
    Text(formatter.string(from: value))
}

Good:

final class Formatters {
    static let number = NumberFormatter()
}

var body: some View {
    Text(Formatters.number.string(from: value))
}

Computed properties with heavy work

Bad:

var filtered: [Item] {
    items.filter { $0.isEnabled }  // Runs every body eval
}

Good:

@State private var filtered: [Item] = []

.onChange(of: items) {
    filtered = items.filter { $0.isEnabled }
}

Sorting/filtering in ForEach

Bad:

ForEach(items.sorted(by: sortRule)) { item in
    Row(item)
}

Good:

let sortedItems = items.sorted(by: sortRule)  // Compute once
ForEach(sortedItems) { item in
    Row(item)
}

Unstable identity

Bad:

ForEach(items, id: \.self) { item in  // \.self may not be stable
    Row(item)
}

Good:

ForEach(items, id: \.stableID) { item in
    Row(item)
}

Image decoding on main thread

Bad:

Image(uiImage: UIImage(data: data)!)

Good:

// Decode/downsample off main thread, cache the result
@State private var image: UIImage?

.task {
    image = await ImageLoader.load(data: data, targetSize: size)
}

Broad dependencies in observable models

Bad:

@Observable class Model {
    var items: [Item] = []
}

var body: some View {
    Row(isFavorite: model.items.contains(item))  // Entire array dependency
}

Good:

// Granular view models or per-item state to reduce update fan-out

4. Remediation Strategies

IssueFix
Broad state changesNarrow scope with @State/@Observable closer to leaves
Unstable identitiesUse stable, unique IDs for ForEach
Heavy work in bodyPrecompute, cache, move to @State
Expensive subtreesUse equatable() or value wrappers
Large imagesDownsample before rendering
Layout complexityReduce nesting, use fixed sizing where possible

5. Verify

Ask user to re-run same capture and compare with baseline:

  • CPU usage
  • Frame drops
  • Memory peak

Output Format

Provide:

  1. Metrics table (before/after if available)
  2. Top issues (ordered by impact)
  3. Proposed fixes with estimated effort

Profiling Commands

# Build for profiling
xcodebuild -scheme MyApp -configuration Release -destination 'platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 15 Pro' build

# Open in Instruments
open -a Instruments

Instruments Checklist

  • Use Release build (not Debug)
  • Select SwiftUI template
  • Reproduce exact problematic interaction
  • Look at SwiftUI timeline for body evaluations
  • Check Time Profiler for hot spots
  • Note frame rate drops in Animation timeline

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.