test-generator
Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate tests for existing code — unit, integration, edge cases. Use when adding test coverage, verifying fixes, or testing new features.
25 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- u9401066/zotero-keepertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Data-Wise/crafttheir own version, first seen Oct 31, 2026
- u9401066/pubmed-search-mcptheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- aidankaokao/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- jablonkai/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 1, 2026
- Ecoa-PUC-Rio/GAIDEtheir own version, first seen Aug 19, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use refactor-advisor, log-analyzer and 2 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
aidankaokaoSkillrefactor-advisor
分析程式碼的重構機會,給出有優先順序的建議,但不直接改寫程式碼。當使用者說「這段程式碼怎麼改比較好」、「幫我分析重構方向」、「這樣寫有什麼問題」、「refactor」、「技術債」時觸發。
Also in 3 projects that use this
nek1987Skilllog-analyzer
Parse and analyze application logs to identify errors, patterns, and insights.
Also in 3 projects that use this
JeffallanSkillsecurity-reviewer
Identifies security vulnerabilities, generates structured audit reports with severity ratings, and provides actionable remediation guidance. Use when conducting security audits, reviewing code for vulnerabilities, or analyzing infrastructure security. Invoke for SAST scans, penetration testing, DevSecOps practices, cloud security reviews, dependency audits, secrets scanning, or compliance checks. Produces vulnerability reports, prioritized recommendations, and compliance checklists.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillgit-workflow
Squad branching model: dev-first workflow with insiders preview channel
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions25 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 25
- laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zh★ 907same name
- u9401066/pubmed-search-mcp★ 28same name
- Ecoa-PUC-Rio/GAIDE★ 8same name
- jcarlos78/GAIDE★ 8same name
- u9401066/zotero-keeper★ 7same name
- bestdeejay-design/agent-skills★ 6same name
- Data-Wise/craft★ 4same name
- u9401066/nsforge-mcp★ 4same name
- Nembie/claude-code-skills★ 3same name
- suxiao1824308603/Qoder-devtools-skills★ 3same name
15 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- api-integrationSkill
- bug-fixSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- data-analysisSkill
- document-writerSkill
- refactorSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 27
Test names describe the behavior: test_returns_empty_list_when_no_results
- Distinctive: line 31
If you need more than 5 lines of setup, the code is too coupled
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Test Generator
What to test
- Happy path — normal input produces expected output
- Edge cases — empty, null, zero, max values, unicode, special chars
- Error paths — invalid input, missing dependencies, network failures
- Boundary conditions — off-by-one, pagination limits, timeout thresholds
What NOT to test
- Implementation details (private methods, internal state)
- Framework code (don't test that React renders a div)
- Trivial getters/setters with no logic
Structure per test
# Arrange — set up the inputs and dependencies
# Act — call the function/endpoint
# Assert — check the result matches expectationsRules
- Test names describe the behavior:
test_returns_empty_list_when_no_results - One assertion per test (or one logical assertion group)
- Tests must be independent — no shared mutable state between tests
- Mock external services, not internal code
- If you need more than 5 lines of setup, the code is too coupled
Output
For each function/endpoint:
- 2-3 happy path tests
- 2-3 edge case tests
- 1-2 error path tests
- Each test with clear name, arrange/act/assert, and brief comment on what it verifies
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

