content-extension-evaluation
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
寫完核心章節 / 教學模組後評估「該補哪些延伸內容」的標準流程。產出 6 軸候選 + ROI 矩陣 + 立即補 / backlog 排序、避免完美主義 collapse 跟覆蓋率不足兩種反向誤判。觸發詞:延伸評估、補章節、章節後續、評估缺口、規模成長後續、extension 候選、內容後續、模組完成評估、長期維護、知識卡缺口、跨章整合、vendor 深入。Trigger when evaluating what extensions to add after completing a batch of teaching chapters.
In this repository75 other files it gives its agents.
- 5w1h-decisionSkill
- agent-teamSkill
- asd-ste100Skill
- blank-slate-reviewSkill
- branch-worktree-guardianSkill
- broken-link-checkSkill
- bulk-evaluateSkill
- business-analysisSkill
- business-researchSkill
- case-first-module-workflowSkill
- cc-release-impact-reviewSkill
- chrome-extension-mcp-debugSkill
- cognitive-load-assessmentSkill
- component-contract-designSkill
- compositional-writingSkill
- continuous-learningSkill
- dart-comment-traceabilitySkill
- dart-domain-modelingSkill
- dart-provider-architectureSkill
- dart-style-guardianSkill
- dart-test-async-guardianSkill
- data-extractionSkill
- decision-tree-helperSkill
- design-decision-frameworkSkill
- dispatch-strategy-reviewSkill
- doc-flowSkill
- docSkill
- error-patternSkill
- event-flow-arbitration-designSkill
- evidence-driven-bugfixSkill
- foundation-designSkill
- framework-issueSkill
- frontend-with-playwrightSkill
- golden-path-validationSkill
- impeccableSkill
- knowledge-cardsSkill
- linux-install-debugSkill
- lsp-firstSkill
- mermaid-asciiSkill
- methodology-writingSkill
- migration-playbook-methodologySkill
- multi-round-reviewSkill
- multi-session-orchestrationSkill
- neurodivergent-outputSkill
- observability-stackSkill
- parallel-evaluationSkill
- pre-fix-evalSkill
- project-analysisSkill
- project-initSkill
- requirement-protocolSkill
- saas-tech-selectionSkill
- scope-confirmationSkill
- search-tools-guideSkill
- skill-design-guideSkill
- skill-syncSkill
- specSkill
- startup-checkSkill
- strategic-compactSkill
- system-designSkill
- system-misjudgmentSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

