agentleFS
tanishq286tanishq286/tq-forge/skills/tq-forge-scan/SKILL.md

tq-forge-scan

Skill8 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Scan every installed skill and detect coverage gaps — workflows you keep doing by hand that don't have a skill yet. Builds a coverage map from skill descriptions and recommends forge candidates. Use when asked for "/tq-forge-scan", "find skill gaps", "what's missing", or "scan for forge candidates".

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Gather candidate gaps: Ask the user what repetitive workflows they've been doing by hand lately, or skim recent session history if …

    line 46
  2. Distinctive:

    When unsure, ask before recommending a forge.

    line 73

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/tq-forge-scan — gap detection across the skill library

When to use

You suspect there's a workflow you've re-done by hand several times that should have been forged already. Or you want a coverage report before a forge spree.

Procedure

export TQ_FORGE_HOME="${TQ_FORGE_HOME:-$HOME/.tq-forge}"
source "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-${TQ_FORGE_HOME:-$HOME/.tq-forge}/install}/scripts/common.sh" && tq_ensure_home
  1. Enumerate every installed skill.
    ls "$CLAUDE_SKILLS_DIR" 2>/dev/null
    find "$HOME/.claude/plugins" -maxdepth 4 -name SKILL.md 2>/dev/null | head -100
    ls "$SANDBOX_SKILLS" "$SANDBOX_AGENTS" 2>/dev/null
  2. Read each skill's description: frontmatter to build a coverage map:
    for d in "$CLAUDE_SKILLS_DIR"/*/; do
      name=$(basename "$d")
      desc=$(awk '/^description:/{flag=1;next} /^[a-z-]+:/{flag=0} flag' "$d/SKILL.md" 2>/dev/null | head -3)
      echo "$name | $desc"
    done
    Group what's covered into categories (browser, design, security, deployment, research, ops, data, communication, etc.).
  3. Gather candidate gaps. Ask the user what repetitive workflows they've been doing by hand lately, or skim recent session history if available. Each recurring manual task with no matching skill is a candidate.
  4. For each candidate, classify:
    • Already covered — a skill exists with a matching description. Drop.
    • Partially covered — exists but the description is mismatched. Suggest /tq-forge-improve <existing>.
    • Real gap — no skill matches. Suggest /tq-forge "<intent>".
  5. Render a gap report:
    🔍 tq-forge-scan — coverage report
     Installed:  <N> skills, <M> agents
     Forgeable:  <K> sandbox + <P> promoted
     ───────────────────────────────────────────
     🟢 Covered:        browser-test, ship, design-audit, ...
     🟡 Partial:        notion-summary (description vague)
     🔴 Gap candidates:
        1. weekly-metrics-digest
        2. invoice-reconcile

Pitfalls

  • The scan is heuristic — it matches descriptions textually, so a skill with a poorly-written description: can look like a gap even when it covers the case. When unsure, ask before recommending a forge.
  • Plugin-provided skills (under ~/.claude/plugins) are usually not yours to edit — list them as covered/reference, not as improve candidates.

Verification

  • The "Installed" count is in the same ballpark as find "$CLAUDE_SKILLS_DIR" -name SKILL.md | wc -l plus plugin skills.
  • Each gap candidate is a workflow with no matching installed skill description.

Tags

tq-forge scan gap-detection read-only

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.