project-start
Skill9 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Standard project inception, specification, harness, and multi-agent verification workflow. Use when the user says `/작업개시`, `작업개시`, `*/작업개시*`, `Target project: ...`, asks to start a new project from specifications, create 仕様書/要件定義書/技術設計書, generate AGENTS.md/CHECKS.md/TASKS/current.md, create a fixed harness, prevent implementation drift from docs, or run explorer/worker/reviewer/tester subagent-style validation.
- Reads credentials
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- grace-method/grace-plugintheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- razbakov/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- razbakov/skills★ 4same name
- grace-method/grace-plugin★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository56 other files it gives its agents.
- harness/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- academic-research-routerSkill
- accessibilitySkill
- adaptive-project-harnessSkill
- anti-slopSkill
- apple-designSkill
- arenaSkill
- astryx-design-systemSkill
- attention-spanSkill
- copywritingSkill
- crash-outSkill
- croSkill
- cybersecurity-skill-routerSkill
- design-isms-referenceSkill
- design-minimal-blue-pitchdeckSkill
- design-source-routerSkill
- design-specSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- emil-design-engSkill
- external-review-routerSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- gh-address-commentsSkill
- handoffSkill
- humanize-japaneseSkill
- hyperframes-animationSkill
- hyperframes-audioSkill
- hyperframes-cliSkill
- hyperframes-coreSkill
- hyperframes-creativeSkill
- hyperframes-keyframesSkill
- hyperframes-registrySkill
- hyperframesSkill
- hyperframes-studioSkill
- impeccableSkill
- implement-changeSkill
- leak-checkSkill
- library-docsSkill
- loop-librarySkill
- media-useSkill
- motion-graphicsSkill
- obsidian-memory-routerSkill
- openpencil-cliSkill
- ponytailSkill
- product-marketingSkill
- pr-ossSkill
- remove-ai-marksSkill
- requirements-clarificationSkill
- retroSkill
- review-changeSkill
- screenshotSkill
- security-auditSkill
- startup-evidenceSkill
- taste-guided-uiSkill
- team-patternsSkill
- understandSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
26 rules. About 0 are common, 21 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈21
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Use this skill to start or repair a project from a stable operating frame: specs first, harness second, implementation third, review and …
- Distinctive: line 13
Treat these as triggers:
- Distinctive: line 25
If target root is ambiguous and cannot be inferred from cwd, ask one short question before editing.
- Distinctive: line 29
Create or maintain this project frame:
- Distinctive: line 41
Use this source-of-truth order in generated projects:
- Distinctive: line 49
When these files already exist, read them first and update only what the current goal changes.
- Distinctive: line 50
Do not overwrite existing operator rules, protected-data rules, or checks without explicit reason.
- Very specific: line 55
When --force is used, the bootstrap script must back up existing managed files under .project-start-backup/ before overwriting them.
- Distinctive: line 63
After bootstrapping, inspect generated files and adapt them to the project.
- Very specific: line 69
Read local project rules first: AGENTS.md, CHECKS.md, TASKS/current.md, and existing specs if present.
- Distinctive: line 70
Write or update specs before implementing behavior.
- Distinctive: line 72
Add fixture/smoke coverage before or with risky behavior changes.
- Very specific: line 74
Run the relevant commands from CHECKS.md.
- Distinctive: line 81
Use a supervisor pattern: the main agent is the orchestrator, owns scope and final integration, and delegates bounded work to specialized …
- Distinctive: line 91
Default split by task:
- Distinctive: line 102
No subagent should read or print secrets, raw personal data, live DB contents, auth stores, cookies, or token files unless the user …
- Distinctive: line 108
Use temp DBs, temp blobs, and temp auth paths where possible.
- Very specific: line 109
Do not read .env, auth/, playwright/.auth/, live DBs, or raw personal data unless the user explicitly asks.
- Distinctive: line 110
Keep live APIs out of default harness checks.
- Distinctive: line 111
Do not run arbitrary package scripts, deploy commands, mail sends, browser auth flows, or production mutations in the default generated …
- Very specific: line 112
Use one command such as ./scripts/verify-harness.sh as the final gate.
- Distinctive: line 113
If a behavior changes, add fixture coverage for the incident that motivated it.
- Distinctive: line 121
Use AI Engineering Coach concepts as harness-quality criteria, not as a dashboard requirement:
- Distinctive: line 137
If docs and code disagree, stop and reconcile them before claiming completion.
- Distinctive: line 141
Keep the final response short:
- Distinctive: line 145
Call out skipped checks and remaining risks.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Project Start
Use this skill to start or repair a project from a stable operating frame: specs first, harness second, implementation third, review and test last.
Command Contract
Treat these as triggers:
/작업개시작업개시*/작업개시*Target project: <name>with inception, harness, specs, or subagent review language
Parse these optional fields when present:
Target project:repository or folder name.Goal:desired outcome.Mode:inception,implementation,review, orrepair.Subagents:auto,yes, or a role list.
If target root is ambiguous and cannot be inferred from cwd, ask one short question before editing.
Source Of Truth
Create or maintain this project frame:
docs/inception.md: product intent, user, non-goals, operating assumptions.docs/requirements.md: user-facing requirements and acceptance criteria.docs/technical-design.md: architecture, data flow, integrations, risks.AGENTS.md: project-wide main prompt with source-of-truth order, full Karpathy-style always-on engineering discipline, protected data, routing, and workflow.CHECKS.md: deterministic validation commands and what they cover.TASKS/current.md: current task frame and done criteria..gitignore: public-safety ignore rules for secrets, auth state, local data, and build artifacts.scripts/harness-env.sh: isolated temp env for checks.scripts/validate-local.sh: local smoke checks.scripts/verify-harness.sh: one entrypoint that runs all required checks.
Use this source-of-truth order in generated projects:
- Latest user request.
TASKS/current.mdfor current focus and done criteria.docs/requirements.mdfor user-visible behavior and acceptance criteria.docs/technical-design.mdfor ownership boundaries and validation design.AGENTS.mdfor project-wide operating rules.CHECKS.mdfor deterministic verification commands.
When these files already exist, read them first and update only what the current goal changes. Do not overwrite existing operator rules, protected-data rules, or checks without explicit reason.
Bootstrap
For a new or mostly empty project, use scripts/bootstrap_project_start.py from this skill if it fits. It creates the standard frame without overwriting existing files unless --force is passed.
When --force is used, the bootstrap script must back up existing managed files under .project-start-backup/ before overwriting them.
Example:
python /path/to/project-start/scripts/bootstrap_project_start.py --root /path/to/project --project-name starlink --goal "..."After bootstrapping, inspect generated files and adapt them to the project. Treat generated content as a starting point, not final truth.
The bootstrap output is the common base. Add a project-specific quality profile before implementation whenever the project has concrete code, UI, data, automation, deployment, mail, auth, payment, migration, deletion, or integration behavior.
Workflow
- Read local project rules first:
AGENTS.md,CHECKS.md,TASKS/current.md, and existing specs if present. - Write or update specs before implementing behavior.
- Define harness checks that can run without secrets, live production data, or external destructive writes.
- Add fixture/smoke coverage before or with risky behavior changes.
- Implement in the smallest owned file scope.
- Run the relevant commands from
CHECKS.md. - Report changed files, checks, skipped checks, operator impact, and residual risk.
Subagents
작업개시, /작업개시, and */작업개시* include permission for automatic subagent use unless the user says not to. Subagents: auto is the explicit long-form equivalent.
Use a supervisor pattern: the main agent is the orchestrator, owns scope and final integration, and delegates bounded work to specialized agents. Do not use subagents for tiny one-file edits, simple questions, or work where the immediate next step depends entirely on the delegated result.
Automatic routing:
explorer: first pass for non-empty repos, unclear architecture, existing auth/data flows, or before touching unfamiliar code. Read-only; answer with paths and flow.spec-writer: prompted worker for large inception work when docs can be drafted in a disjoint scope such asdocs/**andTASKS/current.md.worker: implementation only after the main agent gives exact file ownership and non-overlapping write scope.reviewer: prompted worker or reviewer-style pass focused on security, regression, data loss, duplicate writes, over-broad automation, and drift from specs.tester: prompted worker or tester-style pass that runs onlyCHECKS.mdor declared harness commands and reports skipped checks.release-preflight: use theleak-checkskill before public GitHub, portfolio, package, or external handoff.
Default split by task:
- New project or empty folder: main drafts the initial specs/harness, then reviewer/tester validate the frame when the scope is more than a minimal skeleton.
- Existing project with unclear structure: explorer first, then main decides whether worker/reviewer/tester are needed.
- Multi-file implementation: explorer if needed, worker for exact files, reviewer for risk, tester for checks.
- Security, auth, payments, mail/calendar sync, data migration, deletion, or duplicate-write logic: reviewer and tester are expected unless the change is trivial.
- Public release or GitHub push/PR: run
leak-check; attach security/release-preflight review for non-trivial repos.
Delegation constraints:
- Each subagent gets a concrete output contract and file scope.
- Workers are told they are not alone in the codebase and must not revert unrelated edits.
- Reviewer and tester are read-only unless explicitly assigned a fix.
- No subagent should read or print secrets, raw personal data, live DB contents, auth stores, cookies, or token files unless the user explicitly asks.
- The main agent reconciles conflicts, applies final judgment, and reports what was delegated.
Harness Rules
Harness must be deterministic and safe:
- Use temp DBs, temp blobs, and temp auth paths where possible.
- Do not read
.env,auth/,playwright/.auth/, live DBs, or raw personal data unless the user explicitly asks. - Keep live APIs out of default harness checks.
- Do not run arbitrary package scripts, deploy commands, mail sends, browser auth flows, or production mutations in the default generated harness.
- Use one command such as
./scripts/verify-harness.shas the final gate. - If a behavior changes, add fixture coverage for the incident that motivated it.
Generate harnesses with this layered model:
- Common base:
AGENTS.md, source-of-truth order, data safety, subagent routing, and final gate. - Universal quality gates: deterministic local checks, secret isolation, no live APIs by default, no private logs, and no arbitrary package scripts.
- Project-specific quality profile: language checks, fixture tests, integration mocks, UI checks, or deployment checks chosen from that project's specs.
- Opt-in live checks: manual commands for real APIs, mail, deployments, or production data, never part of the default final gate.
Use AI Engineering Coach concepts as harness-quality criteria, not as a dashboard requirement:
- Prompt quality: specs, acceptance criteria, file references, and clear constraints exist.
- Session hygiene:
TASKS/current.mdis focused and the final response reports checks and skipped checks. - Code review: reviewer checks security, regression, data loss, duplicate writes, and spec drift.
- Tool mastery: use relevant skills/subagents when they materially reduce risk.
- Context management: keep always-on prompt files useful; move project-specific detail into scoped docs.
Drift Control
Prevent ずれ between specs and code:
- Requirements state behavior in user terms.
- Technical design states data flow and ownership.
- Harness fixtures lock high-risk behavior.
- Reviewer checks for security, regression, data loss, duplicate writes, and over-broad automation.
- Tester runs only declared checks and reports skipped checks.
If docs and code disagree, stop and reconcile them before claiming completion.
Final Response
Keep the final response short:
- State what was created or changed.
- List key files.
- List validation commands and pass/fail.
- Call out skipped checks and remaining risks.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

