agentleFS
taljeontaljeon/plzdo/skills/project-start/SKILL.md

project-start

Skill9 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub

Standard project inception, specification, harness, and multi-agent verification workflow. Use when the user says `/작업개시`, `작업개시`, `*/작업개시*`, `Target project: ...`, asks to start a new project from specifications, create 仕様書/要件定義書/技術設計書, generate AGENTS.md/CHECKS.md/TASKS/current.md, create a fixed harness, prevent implementation drift from docs, or run explorer/worker/reviewer/tester subagent-style validation.

  • Reads credentials

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

26 rules. About 0 are common, 21 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈21

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill to start or repair a project from a stable operating frame: specs first, harness second, implementation third, review and …

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Treat these as triggers:

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    If target root is ambiguous and cannot be inferred from cwd, ask one short question before editing.

    line 25
  4. Distinctive:

    Create or maintain this project frame:

    line 29
  5. Distinctive:

    Use this source-of-truth order in generated projects:

    line 41
  6. Distinctive:

    When these files already exist, read them first and update only what the current goal changes.

    line 49
  7. Distinctive:

    Do not overwrite existing operator rules, protected-data rules, or checks without explicit reason.

    line 50
  8. Very specific:

    When --force is used, the bootstrap script must back up existing managed files under .project-start-backup/ before overwriting them.

    line 55
  9. Distinctive:

    After bootstrapping, inspect generated files and adapt them to the project.

    line 63
  10. Very specific:

    Read local project rules first: AGENTS.md, CHECKS.md, TASKS/current.md, and existing specs if present.

    line 69
  11. Distinctive:

    Write or update specs before implementing behavior.

    line 70
  12. Distinctive:

    Add fixture/smoke coverage before or with risky behavior changes.

    line 72
  13. Very specific:

    Run the relevant commands from CHECKS.md.

    line 74
  14. Distinctive:

    Use a supervisor pattern: the main agent is the orchestrator, owns scope and final integration, and delegates bounded work to specialized …

    line 81
  15. Distinctive:

    Default split by task:

    line 91
  16. Distinctive:

    No subagent should read or print secrets, raw personal data, live DB contents, auth stores, cookies, or token files unless the user …

    line 102
  17. Distinctive:

    Use temp DBs, temp blobs, and temp auth paths where possible.

    line 108
  18. Very specific:

    Do not read .env, auth/, playwright/.auth/, live DBs, or raw personal data unless the user explicitly asks.

    line 109
  19. Distinctive:

    Keep live APIs out of default harness checks.

    line 110
  20. Distinctive:

    Do not run arbitrary package scripts, deploy commands, mail sends, browser auth flows, or production mutations in the default generated …

    line 111
  21. Very specific:

    Use one command such as ./scripts/verify-harness.sh as the final gate.

    line 112
  22. Distinctive:

    If a behavior changes, add fixture coverage for the incident that motivated it.

    line 113
  23. Distinctive:

    Use AI Engineering Coach concepts as harness-quality criteria, not as a dashboard requirement:

    line 121
  24. Distinctive:

    If docs and code disagree, stop and reconcile them before claiming completion.

    line 137
  25. Distinctive:

    Keep the final response short:

    line 141
  26. Distinctive:

    Call out skipped checks and remaining risks.

    line 145

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Project Start

Use this skill to start or repair a project from a stable operating frame: specs first, harness second, implementation third, review and test last.

Command Contract

Treat these as triggers:

  • /작업개시
  • 작업개시
  • */작업개시*
  • Target project: <name> with inception, harness, specs, or subagent review language

Parse these optional fields when present:

  • Target project: repository or folder name.
  • Goal: desired outcome.
  • Mode: inception, implementation, review, or repair.
  • Subagents: auto, yes, or a role list.

If target root is ambiguous and cannot be inferred from cwd, ask one short question before editing.

Source Of Truth

Create or maintain this project frame:

  • docs/inception.md: product intent, user, non-goals, operating assumptions.
  • docs/requirements.md: user-facing requirements and acceptance criteria.
  • docs/technical-design.md: architecture, data flow, integrations, risks.
  • AGENTS.md: project-wide main prompt with source-of-truth order, full Karpathy-style always-on engineering discipline, protected data, routing, and workflow.
  • CHECKS.md: deterministic validation commands and what they cover.
  • TASKS/current.md: current task frame and done criteria.
  • .gitignore: public-safety ignore rules for secrets, auth state, local data, and build artifacts.
  • scripts/harness-env.sh: isolated temp env for checks.
  • scripts/validate-local.sh: local smoke checks.
  • scripts/verify-harness.sh: one entrypoint that runs all required checks.

Use this source-of-truth order in generated projects:

  1. Latest user request.
  2. TASKS/current.md for current focus and done criteria.
  3. docs/requirements.md for user-visible behavior and acceptance criteria.
  4. docs/technical-design.md for ownership boundaries and validation design.
  5. AGENTS.md for project-wide operating rules.
  6. CHECKS.md for deterministic verification commands.

When these files already exist, read them first and update only what the current goal changes. Do not overwrite existing operator rules, protected-data rules, or checks without explicit reason.

Bootstrap

For a new or mostly empty project, use scripts/bootstrap_project_start.py from this skill if it fits. It creates the standard frame without overwriting existing files unless --force is passed. When --force is used, the bootstrap script must back up existing managed files under .project-start-backup/ before overwriting them.

Example:

python /path/to/project-start/scripts/bootstrap_project_start.py --root /path/to/project --project-name starlink --goal "..."

After bootstrapping, inspect generated files and adapt them to the project. Treat generated content as a starting point, not final truth.

The bootstrap output is the common base. Add a project-specific quality profile before implementation whenever the project has concrete code, UI, data, automation, deployment, mail, auth, payment, migration, deletion, or integration behavior.

Workflow

  1. Read local project rules first: AGENTS.md, CHECKS.md, TASKS/current.md, and existing specs if present.
  2. Write or update specs before implementing behavior.
  3. Define harness checks that can run without secrets, live production data, or external destructive writes.
  4. Add fixture/smoke coverage before or with risky behavior changes.
  5. Implement in the smallest owned file scope.
  6. Run the relevant commands from CHECKS.md.
  7. Report changed files, checks, skipped checks, operator impact, and residual risk.

Subagents

작업개시, /작업개시, and */작업개시* include permission for automatic subagent use unless the user says not to. Subagents: auto is the explicit long-form equivalent.

Use a supervisor pattern: the main agent is the orchestrator, owns scope and final integration, and delegates bounded work to specialized agents. Do not use subagents for tiny one-file edits, simple questions, or work where the immediate next step depends entirely on the delegated result.

Automatic routing:

  • explorer: first pass for non-empty repos, unclear architecture, existing auth/data flows, or before touching unfamiliar code. Read-only; answer with paths and flow.
  • spec-writer: prompted worker for large inception work when docs can be drafted in a disjoint scope such as docs/** and TASKS/current.md.
  • worker: implementation only after the main agent gives exact file ownership and non-overlapping write scope.
  • reviewer: prompted worker or reviewer-style pass focused on security, regression, data loss, duplicate writes, over-broad automation, and drift from specs.
  • tester: prompted worker or tester-style pass that runs only CHECKS.md or declared harness commands and reports skipped checks.
  • release-preflight: use the leak-check skill before public GitHub, portfolio, package, or external handoff.

Default split by task:

  • New project or empty folder: main drafts the initial specs/harness, then reviewer/tester validate the frame when the scope is more than a minimal skeleton.
  • Existing project with unclear structure: explorer first, then main decides whether worker/reviewer/tester are needed.
  • Multi-file implementation: explorer if needed, worker for exact files, reviewer for risk, tester for checks.
  • Security, auth, payments, mail/calendar sync, data migration, deletion, or duplicate-write logic: reviewer and tester are expected unless the change is trivial.
  • Public release or GitHub push/PR: run leak-check; attach security/release-preflight review for non-trivial repos.

Delegation constraints:

  • Each subagent gets a concrete output contract and file scope.
  • Workers are told they are not alone in the codebase and must not revert unrelated edits.
  • Reviewer and tester are read-only unless explicitly assigned a fix.
  • No subagent should read or print secrets, raw personal data, live DB contents, auth stores, cookies, or token files unless the user explicitly asks.
  • The main agent reconciles conflicts, applies final judgment, and reports what was delegated.

Harness Rules

Harness must be deterministic and safe:

  • Use temp DBs, temp blobs, and temp auth paths where possible.
  • Do not read .env, auth/, playwright/.auth/, live DBs, or raw personal data unless the user explicitly asks.
  • Keep live APIs out of default harness checks.
  • Do not run arbitrary package scripts, deploy commands, mail sends, browser auth flows, or production mutations in the default generated harness.
  • Use one command such as ./scripts/verify-harness.sh as the final gate.
  • If a behavior changes, add fixture coverage for the incident that motivated it.

Generate harnesses with this layered model:

  1. Common base: AGENTS.md, source-of-truth order, data safety, subagent routing, and final gate.
  2. Universal quality gates: deterministic local checks, secret isolation, no live APIs by default, no private logs, and no arbitrary package scripts.
  3. Project-specific quality profile: language checks, fixture tests, integration mocks, UI checks, or deployment checks chosen from that project's specs.
  4. Opt-in live checks: manual commands for real APIs, mail, deployments, or production data, never part of the default final gate.

Use AI Engineering Coach concepts as harness-quality criteria, not as a dashboard requirement:

  • Prompt quality: specs, acceptance criteria, file references, and clear constraints exist.
  • Session hygiene: TASKS/current.md is focused and the final response reports checks and skipped checks.
  • Code review: reviewer checks security, regression, data loss, duplicate writes, and spec drift.
  • Tool mastery: use relevant skills/subagents when they materially reduce risk.
  • Context management: keep always-on prompt files useful; move project-specific detail into scoped docs.

Drift Control

Prevent ずれ between specs and code:

  • Requirements state behavior in user terms.
  • Technical design states data flow and ownership.
  • Harness fixtures lock high-risk behavior.
  • Reviewer checks for security, regression, data loss, duplicate writes, and over-broad automation.
  • Tester runs only declared checks and reports skipped checks.

If docs and code disagree, stop and reconcile them before claiming completion.

Final Response

Keep the final response short:

  • State what was created or changed.
  • List key files.
  • List validation commands and pass/fail.
  • Call out skipped checks and remaining risks.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.