agentleFS
swayamdhawanswayamdhawan/x-agent/skills/x-human/SKILL.md

x-human

Skill0 starsChanged 38 days agoMITView on GitHub

Strip the machine fingerprint out of any draft - em dashes, AI slop words, invisible watermark characters, thread boilerplate - and score it against a five-check detection panel before it goes out. Use whenever text needs to sound human, when the user says humanize, "does this sound like AI", "remove the em dashes", "de-slop this", "this sounds like ChatGPT", or before any post, thread, reply or DM from this pack is shown to the user.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions2 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 1

    1. Jakeschincariol/x-agent-skill★ 4100% same

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. belzoralolbtw/x-agent-skill★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the structural flags.

    line 116
  2. Distinctive:

    If the verdict is not PASS, fix the weakest check named in the output and go again.

    line 118

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

x-human

Two tools live in this folder and they both actually run. Use them. Do not eyeball this.

python3 humanize.py draft.txt --report        # clean it, show what changed
python3 detect.py draft.txt                    # score it, five checks
python3 detect.py before.txt after.txt         # prove the delta

Both read slop.json: 176 stock words and phrases with plain-English replacements, 18 invisible character classes, 11 typographic substitutions and 18 structural tells. The last block of each list is X-specific: thread boilerplate ("if you found this thread helpful"), repost bait ("RT if you agree", "like and repost") and the "A thread 🧵" hook. It is meant to be edited. If the user has a word they always use that the lexicon strips, take it out of the file.

Why this matters more on X than it looks

A post is 280 characters. One em dash in a two-line post is a far larger share of the text than the same dash in an essay, and people on X have spent three years learning to spot the shape. The tell is not a detector flagging the post. The tell is a reply that says "chatgpt ahh post", and it sits under your post for everyone to read.

What gets fixed automatically

1. Invisible characters. Zero-width spaces and joiners, word joiners, soft hyphens, byte-order marks, Unicode tag characters, invisible separators, non-breaking and narrow spaces. A keyboard does not produce these. They survive copy-paste and they are invisible in every editor. humanize.py deletes every one, including any remaining Unicode format character it does not have a name for.

Except inside emoji. X is full of them, and two invisible characters are load-bearing there: the joiner that makes 👨‍💻 one glyph instead of 👨💻, and the tag characters that spell the England, Scotland and Wales flags. Those are kept. A joiner or a tag anywhere else is still deleted, and detect.py does not count the kept ones against you.

2. Typography. Em dash to comma, en dash to hyphen, curly quotes to straight, ellipsis to three dots, bullet character to hyphen. The em dash pass is the one that matters.

3. The slop lexicon. delve, leverage, robust, seamless, game-changer, "let that sink in", "read that again", plus the X block. Each swapped for a plain word or deleted, with capitalisation preserved and URLs left untouched.

What does NOT get fixed automatically

Structural tells get flagged, not rewritten, because changing the shape of a sentence needs judgement:

  • "It's not just X, it's Y" and "not only X but also Y"
  • Rule-of-three triads
  • One-word rhetorical question lines: "The result?"
  • "A thread 🧵" as the hook, and the stock thread closer
  • The preamble: "in this thread I'm going to show you"
  • Two lines in a row that open on an emoji
  • Three or more shouted words in a row
  • Three or more hashtags
  • Reflex bait: "RT if you agree", "follow for more", "Thoughts?"

That list is your job. Rewrite each flagged line by hand, keeping the meaning, then re-run detect.py.

The five checks

detect.py scores five signals 0-100, higher is more human:

checkwhat it measuresmachine looks like
BURSTINESSsentence-length variationevery sentence the same length
SPECIFICITYnumbers, names, concrete markers per 100 wordsabstract nouns, no figures
SLOP DENSITYlexicon hits per 100 wordsstock vocabulary
FINGERPRINTinvisible chars, em dashes, ellipses per 1k charstypographically perfect
VOICEcontractions, person, structural tellsno contractions, staged reveals

The verdict weights the mean at 60% and the weakest single check at 40%, because one signal is enough. PASS needs 70+ overall with no check below 55.

Short posts are scored on what a short post can show. Burstiness needs four sentences and specificity needs about 25 words, so under that they print n/a and sit out rather than count as a neutral 50. Voice drops to its structural-tell half. The output says "scored on 3 of 5 checks" when that happens, so nobody mistakes it for the full panel.

Curly quotes count a quarter. iOS types them by default and most posts are written on a phone, so on their own they say very little. They are still straightened.

Say this honestly

These are five local heuristics modelled on the signals public detectors key on. They run entirely on the user's machine and nothing is uploaded. They are not GPTZero, Originality, Copyleaks, Winston or Turnitin, they do not call those APIs, and they cannot promise those verdicts. Do not make a bigger claim on the user's behalf, and do not tell a user their text is undetectable.

Order of operations

  1. humanize.py draft.txt -o clean.txt --report
  2. Read the structural flags. Rewrite those lines yourself.
  3. detect.py draft.txt clean.txt to show the before and after.
  4. If the verdict is not PASS, fix the weakest check named in the output and go again. Two rounds is normal. Five means the draft was written by formula, and the fix is a different draft.
  5. Show the user the cleaned text and the score. Never the score alone.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.