sdd-design
Skill1 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create the SDD technical design and architecture approach. Trigger: orchestrator launches design for a change.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
If you ARE the sdd-design sub-agent (NOT the orchestrator), the gate above does NOT apply to you.
- Distinctive: line 28
If Spanish technical artifacts are explicitly requested, use neutral/professional Spanish unless the user explicitly asks for a regional …
- Very specific: line 46
engram: Read sdd/{change-name}/proposal (required) and sdd/{change-name}/spec (optional — may not exist if running in parallel with …
- Very specific: line 47
openspec: Read and follow skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md.
- Very specific: line 48
hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist to Engram AND write design.md to filesystem.
- Very specific: line 54
Follow Section A from skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.
- Distinctive: line 58
Before designing, read the actual code that will be affected:
- Distinctive: line 62
Test infrastructure (if any)
- Very specific: line 66
IF mode is
openspecorhybrid: Create the design document: - Very specific: line 75
IF mode is
engramornone: Do NOT create any openspec/ directories or files. - Very specific: line 146
Follow Section C from skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.
- Distinctive: line 176
ALWAYS read the actual codebase before designing — never guess
- Distinctive: line 177
Every decision MUST have a rationale (the "why")
- Distinctive: line 179
Use the project's ACTUAL patterns and conventions, not generic best practices
- Distinctive: line 180
If you find the codebase uses a pattern different from what you'd recommend, note it but FOLLOW the existing pattern unless the change …
- Distinctive: line 181
Keep ASCII diagrams simple — clarity over beauty
- Distinctive: line 183
If you have open questions that BLOCK the design, say so clearly — don't guess
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
ORCHESTRATOR GATE: If you loaded this skill via the
skill()tool, you are the ORCHESTRATOR — STOP. Do NOT execute these instructions inline. Delegate to the dedicatedsdd-designsub-agent using your platform's delegation primitive (e.g.,task(...), sub-agent invocation, etc.). This skill is for EXECUTORS only.
Executor Override
If you ARE the sdd-design sub-agent (NOT the orchestrator), the gate above does NOT apply to you. Continue with the phase work below. Do NOT delegate. Do NOT call the Skill tool. You are the executor — execute.
Language Domain Contract
Generated technical artifacts default to English. Do not inherit the user's conversational language or the active persona's regional voice for SDD artifacts unless the user explicitly requests that artifact language or the project convention requires it.
If Spanish technical artifacts are explicitly requested, use neutral/professional Spanish unless the user explicitly asks for a regional variant.
Public/contextual comments follow the target context language by default. Explicit user language or tone overrides win; Spanish comments default to neutral/professional Spanish unless the user or target context clearly calls for regional tone.
Purpose
You are a sub-agent responsible for TECHNICAL DESIGN. You take the proposal and specs, then produce a design.md that captures HOW the change will be implemented — architecture decisions, data flow, file changes, and technical rationale.
What You Receive
From the orchestrator:
- Change name
- Artifact store mode (
engram | openspec | hybrid | none)
Execution and Persistence Contract
Follow Section B (retrieval) and Section C (persistence) from
skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.
- engram: Read
sdd/{change-name}/proposal(required) andsdd/{change-name}/spec(optional — may not exist if running in parallel with sdd-spec). Save assdd/{change-name}/design. - openspec: Read and follow
skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md. - hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist to Engram AND write
design.mdto filesystem. Retrieve dependencies from Engram (primary) with filesystem fallback. - none: Return result only. Never create or modify project files.
What to Do
Step 1: Load Skills
Follow Section A from skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.
Step 2: Read the Codebase
Before designing, read the actual code that will be affected:
- Entry points and module structure
- Existing patterns and conventions
- Dependencies and interfaces
- Test infrastructure (if any)
Step 3: Write design.md
IF mode is openspec or hybrid: Create the design document:
openspec/changes/{change-name}/
├── proposal.md
├── specs/
└── design.md ← You create thisIF mode is engram or none: Do NOT create any openspec/ directories or files. Compose the design content in memory — you will persist it in Step 4.
Design Document Format
# Design: {Change Title}
## Technical Approach
{Concise description of the overall technical strategy.
How does this map to the proposal's approach? Reference specs.}
## Architecture Decisions
### Decision: {Decision Title}
**Choice**: {What we chose}
**Alternatives considered**: {What we rejected}
**Rationale**: {Why this choice over alternatives}
### Decision: {Decision Title}
**Choice**: {What we chose}
**Alternatives considered**: {What we rejected}
**Rationale**: {Why this choice over alternatives}
## Data Flow
{Describe how data moves through the system for this change.
Use ASCII diagrams when helpful.}
Component A ──→ Component B ──→ Component C
│ │
└──────── Store ───────────────┘
## File Changes
| File | Action | Description |
|------|--------|-------------|
| `path/to/new-file.ext` | Create | {What this file does} |
| `path/to/existing.ext` | Modify | {What changes and why} |
| `path/to/old-file.ext` | Delete | {Why it's being removed} |
## Interfaces / Contracts
{Define any new interfaces, API contracts, type definitions, or data structures.
Use code blocks with the project's language.}
## Testing Strategy
| Layer | What to Test | Approach |
|-------|-------------|----------|
| Unit | {What} | {How} |
| Integration | {What} | {How} |
| E2E | {What} | {How} |
## Migration / Rollout
{If this change requires data migration, feature flags, or phased rollout, describe the plan.
If not applicable, state "No migration required."}
## Open Questions
- [ ] {Any unresolved technical question}
- [ ] {Any decision that needs team input}Step 4: Persist Artifact
This step is MANDATORY — do NOT skip it.
Follow Section C from skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.
- artifact:
design - topic_key:
sdd/{change-name}/design - type:
architecture
Step 5: Return Summary
Return to the orchestrator:
## Design Created
**Change**: {change-name}
**Location**: `openspec/changes/{change-name}/design.md` (openspec/hybrid) | Engram `sdd/{change-name}/design` (engram) | inline (none)
### Summary
- **Approach**: {one-line technical approach}
- **Key Decisions**: {N decisions documented}
- **Files Affected**: {N new, M modified, K deleted}
- **Testing Strategy**: {unit/integration/e2e coverage planned}
### Open Questions
{List any unresolved questions, or "None"}
### Next Step
Ready for tasks (sdd-tasks).Rules
- ALWAYS read the actual codebase before designing — never guess
- Every decision MUST have a rationale (the "why")
- Include concrete file paths, not abstract descriptions
- Use the project's ACTUAL patterns and conventions, not generic best practices
- If you find the codebase uses a pattern different from what you'd recommend, note it but FOLLOW the existing pattern unless the change specifically addresses it
- Keep ASCII diagrams simple — clarity over beauty
- Apply any
rules.designfromopenspec/config.yaml - If you have open questions that BLOCK the design, say so clearly — don't guess
- Size budget: Design artifact MUST be under 800 words. Architecture decisions as tables (option | tradeoff | decision). Code snippets only for non-obvious patterns.
- Return envelope per Section D from
skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- Maicololiveras/praxisgenai-agent-orchestrator★ 160% same
- callingcard1973/claude-skills★ 060% same
Wrote their own version · 6
- luanmorenommaciel/agentspec★ 256same name
- PedroMosquera/squadai★ 10same name
- GabrielaStark/SDD★ 1same name
- GabrielaStark/stark★ 1same name
- duviolin/sdd-kit★ 0same name
- pchemguy/Skill-SDD-Manager★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use sdd-requirements.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GabrielaStarkSkillsdd-requirements
Use this skill whenever generating, validating, or editing a requirements.md file for Spec-Driven Development. Defines the canonical structure (Kiro-strict format), EARS notation rules in English, mandatory validation checklist, and good/bad examples. Trigger whenever the task involves transforming raw input (interviews, transcripts, legacy code analysis) into a formal requirements.md, or when reviewing an existing requirements.md for compliance.
Also in 3 projects that use this
In this repository46 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-skill-release-lifecycleSkill
- better-uiSkill
- branch-prSkill
- chained-prSkill
- cognitive-doc-designSkill
- comment-writerSkill
- community-pr-auditSkill
- cost-optimizerSkill
- deck-design-systemSkill
- domain-managerSkill
- domain-manager-syncSkill
- enterprise-agentic-deliverySkill
- evidence-based-decision-researchSkill
- gentle-ai-ecosystemSkill
- github-build-or-reuseSkill
- github-repo-autopilotSkill
- google-workspace-qualitySkill
- go-testingSkill
- home-assistant-smart-home-plannerSkill
- issue-creationSkill
- judgment-daySkill
- mcp-skills-providerSkill
- open-source-repo-bootstrapSkill
- performance-auditorSkill
- personal-agentic-deliverySkill
- sdd-applySkill
- sdd-archiveSkill
- sdd-exploreSkill
- sdd-initSkill
- sdd-onboardSkill
- sdd-proposeSkill
- sdd-specSkill
- sdd-tasksSkill
- sdd-verifySkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-improverSkill
- skill-publishSkill
- skill-registrySkill
- smart-shopping-advisorSkill
- social-publishingSkill
- startup-competitorsSkill
- startup-designSkill
- startup-pitchSkill
- startup-positioningSkill
- svg153-writing-styleSkill
- work-unit-commitsSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

