wiki-doctor
Skill17 starsChanged 32 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Diagnose and repair the active llmwiki installation and this repository's wiki — owned wiring first, then deterministic state and evidence-aware page repair
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Quarktex/qcobraintheir own version, first seen Aug 2, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Quarktex/qcobrain★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 141
Do not invent a decision, status, or date.
- Distinctive: line 169
If the report says semantic review is due, run:
- Very specific: line 176
If it says a prior launch is incomplete, rerun the review with llmwiki review <repo> --commit --force, then run llmwiki gaps <repo>.
- Distinctive: line 182
Stop once there are zero blocking problem groups.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Engine invocation — resolve it ONCE, in this order, and use the first that exists:
bun "<plugin-root>/src/cli.ts", where<plugin-root>is the directory TWO levels above this skill's base directory (skills/<name>/ → plugin root). This is the plugin and clone install — the normal case. Stop here when that file exists.bun "$LLMWIKI_ROOT/src/cli.ts"whenLLMWIKI_ROOTis set — a host that copied this skill folder OUT of the plugin (OpenClaw, Hermes,skills add) leaves step 1 pointing at that host's skills directory, not at an engine.llmwikion PATH — the launchersetup.shwrites to~/.local/bin, or the npm bin.If none of the three resolve, say so once and stop. Do NOT guess a path: the engine writes into a repository, and a guessed root writes into the wrong one. Every
llmwiki …or engine-CLI reference below means the invocation you resolved here.
/wiki-doctor — repair the active installation and this repository's wiki
Make the active llmwiki wiring and the current repository's docs/wiki/ operational and
trustworthy. This workflow runs two distinct checks in order: llmwiki doctor for the
machine-level installation, then llmwiki wiki-doctor plus an evidence-aware agent repair pass for
the current project.
$ARGUMENTS
Safety boundary
- The CLI owns safe, deterministic repairs only: missing skeleton files/directories, the
the rebuildable index (engine-held;
llmwiki state-path <repo>), citation/link graph, the bounded generated overview section, fully reflected capture watermarks, and eligible derived-database compaction. - Markdown pages are the source of truth. Never rewrite a claim, delete provenance, resolve a contradiction, or choose project direction merely to make the report green.
- Preserve unrelated dirty-worktree changes. Do not commit or push unless the human explicitly asks.
- Installation repair is limited to llmwiki-owned hooks, skills, commands, launchers, and daemon wiring. Never overwrite a conflicting user-owned file.
- Human judgment is required only for direction shifts and genuinely unresolved contradictions. Ordinary lint repair, source lookup, cross-linking, and filing are the agent's work.
- Custom conventions: if
llmwiki config <repo>shows a non-default source, runllmwiki conventions <repo>FIRST and follow ITS category table (dirs · types · review gates) over any category names written in this workflow. The queue (0_review/) and quiz (6_quiz/) folders are fixed structure — those names never change. - Structural migration is gated:
llmwiki migrate <repo>(dry-run) is free detection — always safe to run and report.--commitruns only with the human's explicit OK in this session (add--map old=newfor⚠ unmappeddirs that still hold pages). Reverse drift (".schema-version differs from this engine's config") means the engine clone is the stale side — recommendgit pullon the engine clone instead of migrating.
Procedure
Identify the harness running this workflow. Check only that harness's installation; do not infer the scope from every CLI installed on the machine. Never run the installation doctor without an explicit
--harness.Codex:
llmwiki doctor --harness codexClaude Code:
bun "<plugin-root>/src/cli.ts" doctor --harness claude --fixOpenCode:
llmwiki doctor --harness opencode
The installation doctor can exit 1 for operational findings outside the selected harness, such as unenrolled repositories or capture backlog. A nonzero exit alone does not mean the active harness wiring is broken. Read the named findings: continue to the project check when the selected harness's llmwiki-owned files are current, and carry trust, enrollment, and backlog warnings into the final report.
Claude's scoped
--fixrestores missing owned hooks and command files. If the report instead shows a wrong-clone hook, or Codex/OpenCode reports missing or stale owned wiring, run only the matching clone-pinned repair:Claude Code:
bun <plugin-root>/src/daemon/wire.tsCodex:
bun <plugin-root>/src/daemon/wire-codex.tsOpenCode:
bun <plugin-root>/src/daemon/wire-opencode.ts
Re-run the same scoped installation doctor after a repair. Stop at an unrelated-file conflict instead of overwriting it. Codex hook trust remains a user-owned
/hooksaction; report it explicitly and do not claim the hooks are active before that verdict.Set REPO to the current project root (
$CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIRwhen available, otherwise cwd). Run:llmwiki wiki-doctor <repo> --fixContinue even when it exits 1: that means deterministic repair completed but one or more evidence-bearing problems still need this agent's judgment. Read the entire report.
Its
okfline says whetherdocs/wiki/is an OKF v0.2 bundle. A bundle is kept conformant by the fix itself; a legacy wiki is reported, never converted here — conversion is the human's call (llmwiki okf <repo>dry-run, then--commitonly with their OK).Then run
llmwiki migrate <repo>(dry-run) as the structure-drift check. If it plans renames, surface the plan and resolve it per the Safety boundary's migration gate BEFORE the lint repair passes below — page repairs on a drifted structure file into folders a pending migration is about to rename.Repair every blocking lint error without weakening the underlying knowledge:
page-secret: remove only the credential or private value. Preserve the useful statement and its citation.unresolved-citation: locate the real source. A human statement/decision cites its session transcript; a code fact cites one existing repo-relative path. Never delete the footnote or claim merely to silence lint.- missing/duplicate footnote definitions: repair the definition mechanically while preserving the claim-to-source relation.
- dangling links: point to the intended existing page (relative markdown link, never
[[wikilinks]]) only when the relationship is evident; otherwise remove the broken navigation token without inventing a relationship. - missing or invalid frontmatter: derive fields from the page body and active
llmwiki conventions <repo>output (typefrom the folder;statusstable|draft|deprecated). Do not invent a decision, status, or date. - invalid supersession: find the actual newer page and repair
superseded_by(withstatus: deprecated); never fabricate a target.
Validate each edited page immediately:
llmwiki index <repo> >/dev/null llmwiki lint <repo> --path '<path under docs/wiki>' --errors-onlyTriage warnings by meaning, not by count:
missing-excerpt: add an excerpt only from the cited source viallmwiki excerpt; never synthesize a quotation.- orphan/cross-link warnings: add a link only when an explicit relationship exists in the evidence or page text.
- stale/supersession warnings: require a newer authority. Preserve the old body and mark supersession; do not rewrite history.
- terminology warnings: make a wording-only substitution that does not change the claim.
- newly written repair text: use
/wiki-save's structure contract — numbered sections (## 1.,### 1-1.) when the page holds several groups, then-→-→-and noun-phrase/telegraphic endings where natural. Never reformat an existing grounded page solely for style. - oversized topics, recurring concepts, backlog, and open gaps: report them as
/wiki-deepwork. Do not perform a broad topic rewrite inside doctor. - advisory no-citation warnings on navigation or direction pages may remain when they contain no factual claim.
If the report says semantic review is due, run:
llmwiki review <repo> --commit --if-due llmwiki gaps <repo>If it says a prior launch is incomplete, rerun the review with
llmwiki review <repo> --commit --force, then runllmwiki gaps <repo>. Apply grounded stale-claim and cross-link findings. Put only unresolved contradictions or direction choices intodocs/wiki/0_review/; never auto-resolve them.- Re-run
llmwiki wiki-doctor <repo> --fix. Repeat the blocking repair pass at most three times. Stop once there are zero blocking problem groups. Do not loop just to erase advisory warnings.
Report
Return: installation doctor verdict and owned wiring repairs; deterministic project repairs applied;
page files changed and why; blocking problems remaining; warning groups intentionally deferred;
semantic review/gap status; final project wiki-doctor verdict. If a blocker remains, name the
exact installation surface or page, evidence needed, and why guessing would be unsafe.
<!-- generated by src/plugin/build-assets.ts — edit skill/*.md, then re-run -->Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

