competitor-snapshot
Skill8 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Summarizes a competitor's page into positioning, audience, offers, pricing cues, proof points, and differentiation opportunities. Use when the user wants a competitive analysis, competitor research, or a market comparison, or asks to analyze a competitor's website, landing page, pricing page, product, or ad.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Suryanandx/qvac-uitheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Suryanandx/qvac-ui★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository46 other files it gives its agents.
- answerSkill
- api-to-exampleSkill
- bilingual-readerSkill
- calendar-prepSkill
- caption-assistantSkill
- chart-explainerSkill
- code-translatorSkill
- coupon-hunterSkill
- course-fit-checkSkill
- cover-letter-builderSkill
- deal-checkerSkill
- draft-from-notesSkill
- explainSkill
- fact-checkSkill
- fix-grammarSkill
- hook-generatorSkill
- improve-writingSkill
- interview-prepSkill
- job-application-assistantSkill
- job-fit-reviewSkill
- job-offer-compareSkill
- landing-page-critiqueSkill
- linkedin-outreachSkill
- localize-textSkill
- meeting-follow-upSkill
- outline-builderSkill
- paper-readerSkill
- portfolio-project-reviewSkill
- product-review-summarizerSkill
- pronunciation-and-usageSkill
- regex-decoderSkill
- reply-assistantSkill
- repo-onboarderSkill
- rewrite-longerSkill
- rewrite-shorterSkill
- social-post-generatorSkill
- source-finderSkill
- source-listSkill
- study-planSkill
- style-matchSkill
- summarizeSkill
- table-to-csvSkill
- term-explainerSkill
- terminology-keeperSkill
- tone-rewriterSkill
- translateSkill
The file
Files
Competitor Snapshot
Distill a competitor's page into a quick snapshot a marketer can act on — positioning, audience, offers, pricing cues, proof points, and the gaps you might be able to exploit. Work only from what's visible on the page, in the user's selected text, or in tool results; don't assume private strategy from public copy, and don't copy the competitor's wording.
- Extract positioning, target audience, products/offers, pricing cues, proof points, messaging, CTAs, and objections handled.
- Compare visible claims against the user's own context only when they've provided it; use web search or browser/market tools for external validation when available.
- Identify likely strengths, weaknesses, differentiation opportunities, and open questions to research.
- Separate supported facts, tool-derived context, and your own assumptions or recommendations — label them rather than blending them.
Return concise headings and include these sections when they fit: Positioning, Audience, Offers/pricing, Proof points, Strengths, Weaknesses, Differentiation ideas, Questions to research. Preserve important names, numbers, links, dates, and currencies. Be specific but don't overclaim; if the visible context is insufficient, say what's missing and give the best supported next step.
Example
Page (a project-management SaaS landing page):
"The all-in-one workspace for fast-moving teams." · Hero CTA: "Start free — no credit card." · Pricing: Free, Pro $12/user/mo, Business $24/user/mo. · "Trusted by 4,000+ teams" with logos. · Feature emphasis: real-time docs, AI summaries, 100+ integrations.
Snapshot:
Positioning: All-in-one workspace pitched on speed and consolidation — replace several tools with one.
Audience: Fast-moving startup/SMB teams; self-serve, bottom-up adoption (free tier, no card).
Offers/pricing: Free → Pro $12 → Business $24 per user/mo. No enterprise tier shown — possible gap.
Proof points: "4,000+ teams" plus logos; AI summaries and 100+ integrations as headline features.
Strengths: Low-friction trial, clear tiering, integration breadth.
Weaknesses: No visible security/compliance or enterprise messaging; pricing jumps with no annual discount shown.
Differentiation ideas: Lead with security, admin controls, or a usage-based plan to win larger teams they aren't addressing.
Questions to research: Is there a hidden enterprise plan? What do reviews say about the AI features actually delivering?
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.