executing-plans
Skill2 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when there is a written implementation plan to execute in the session. Load the plan, review it, execute all tasks, and report upon completion. Activate when user mentions "execute plan", "implement plan", "run plan", "start execution", or when a plan document is ready for implementation.
189 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- roronoazoroshao369/vibe-coding-ostheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- mintunitish/tandemtheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- FimawLLC/fimaw-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- mdiri-ai/SoduWorktheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- Wenaixi/dsh-superpowertheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- theexperiencecompany/gaiatheir own version, first seen Nov 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-code-review
中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈
Also in 8 projects that use this
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化
Also in 8 projects that use this
obraSkilldiagnosing-superpowers
Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.
Also in 20 projects that use this
allanninalSkillalgorand-vulnerability-scanner
Scans Algorand smart contracts for 11 common vulnerabilities including rekeying attacks, unchecked transaction fees, missing field validations, and access control issues. Use when auditing Algorand projects (TEAL/PyTeal). (project, gitignored)
Also in 4 projects that use this
allanninalSkillcairo-vulnerability-scanner
Scans Cairo/StarkNet smart contracts for 6 critical vulnerabilities including felt252 arithmetic overflow, L1-L2 messaging issues, address conversion problems, and signature replay. Use when auditing StarkNet projects. (project, gitignored)
Also in 4 projects that use this
farslabSkillaws-agentic-ai
AWS Bedrock AgentCore comprehensive expert for deploying and managing AI agents at scale. Use when working with any AgentCore service including Gateway, Runtime, Memory, Identity, Code Interpreter, Browser, Observability, Agent Registry, or Evaluations. Covers agent deployment, MCP tool integration, credential management, agent discovery, governance workflows, and automated quality assessment. Essential when user mentions AgentCore, agent runtime, agent registry, agent evaluation, MCP gateway, deploy agent, register MCP server, discover agents, evaluate agent quality, agent credentials, or wants to build, deploy, catalog, or monitor AI agents on AWS.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +3 more from Leodorareluctant259
- +1 more from allanninal
Other versions189 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 189
- obra/superpowers★ 314ksame name
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.5ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6ksame name
- lingyired/status-trio★ 1.8ksame name
- GanyuanRan/Aegis★ 1.4ksame name
- pcvelz/superpowers★ 1.3ksame name
- DemonDamon/AgenticX★ 1ksame name
- mdiri-ai/SoduWork★ 930same name
- coco-research/coco★ 797same name
179 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- brainstormingSkill
- code-commentatorSkill
- project-contextSkill
- writing-planSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
28 rules. 0 are common, 27 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 178 edited versions we read keep these.
27
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
Before the plan is completed, do NOT:
- Distinctive: line 28
Use a unified session state file to track progress:
- Distinctive: line 36
After completing a task → Immediately update state file
- Distinctive: line 65
Run git branch --show-current to confirm current branch
- Distinctive: line 66
If on main/master branch, stop and ask if should continue
- Distinctive: line 86
Check if each task defines test file path
- Distinctive: line 87
Verify test file paths are not empty or placeholders
- Distinctive: line 89
If test coverage is insufficient, immediately stop and require test plan to be supplemented
- Distinctive: line 93
If concerns found → Record issues, discuss with user before continuing
- Distinctive: line 94
If test coverage insufficient → Request return to writing-plan to supplement tests
- Distinctive: line 95
If no concerns → Create task list, proceed to Phase 2
- Distinctive: line 116
Update session state file
- Distinctive: line 117
Commit if plan specifies
- Distinctive: line 127
Read existing files before making modifications
- Distinctive: line 128
Use exact code from the plan
- Distinctive: line 130
Check if actual output matches expected output
- Distinctive: line 146
Stop and seek help
- Distinctive: line 148
Completion Criteria: All tasks executed, all tests passed, code comments added, verifications passed
- Distinctive: line 158
Run final verification suite
- Distinctive: line 159
Update session state file marking completion
- Distinctive: line 215
When plan contains multiple subsystems:
- Distinctive: line 217
Read outline file, identify number of subsystems
- Distinctive: line 218
Verify dependencies, order by execution sequence
- Distinctive: line 226
When invoked by writing-plan skill:
- Very specific: line 253
Read session state file design/.session-state.md
- Distinctive: line 254
Verify completed task code and tests
- Distinctive: line 270
Stop and ask user
- Distinctive: line 271
Don't try to force through obstacles
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 178 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Executing Plans Skill
This skill is used to execute written implementation plans, strictly following documented steps.
Core Principles
Execution First
Before the plan is completed, do NOT:
- Skip the review step
- Skip verification steps
- Operate on main branch (unless explicitly approved)
- Guess or assume
Session State Management
Use a unified session state file to track progress:
- Path:
design/.session-state.md - Template:
references/execution-state-template.md(shared)
When to Operate:
- Skill activation → Immediately create/update state file
- After completing a task → Immediately update state file
- At the start of each dialogue round → Read state file to restore context
- After each phase/task completion → Immediately update state file
Termination Condition
The only way to terminate this skill is to complete all tasks and generate a completion report.
Task Status
| Status | Description |
| Completed | Task completed, all verifications passed |
| In Progress | Task is being executed |
| Pending | Task has not started |
| Blocked | Task is blocked by issues |
Workflow
Phase 1: Load and Review Plan
Goal: Load plan document, conduct critical review.
Actions:
- Run
git branch --show-currentto confirm current branch - If on main/master branch, stop and ask if should continue
- Read plan document
- Conduct critical review of plan
- Verify test coverage
Review Checklist:
- Are goals clear and achievable?
- Are all file paths precise and correct?
- Are code snippets complete (not placeholders)?
- Are test commands accurate for the project?
- Is each step granular enough (2-5 minutes)?
- Does each task include test steps?
- Are test file paths clear and complete?
- Do test cases cover main functionality?
Test Coverage Verification:
⚠️ Mandatory Check Items:
- Check if each task defines test file path
- Verify test file paths are not empty or placeholders
- Confirm test cases cover core functionality
- If test coverage is insufficient, immediately stop and require test plan to be supplemented
Decision Points:
- If concerns found → Record issues, discuss with user before continuing
- If test coverage insufficient → Request return to writing-plan to supplement tests
- If no concerns → Create task list, proceed to Phase 2
Completion Criteria: Plan reviewed, test coverage verified, task list created
Phase 2: Execute Tasks
Goal: Execute each task according to the plan.
Execution Rules:
For each task in the plan:
- Mark task as "In Progress" in task list
- Verify test file exists (if it doesn't exist, create test file first)
- Execute each step exactly as written
- Execute tests following TDD flow, tests must pass, test failures must be fixed
- Run specified verifications
- Check if code comments need to be added
- Mark task as "Completed" in task list
- Update session state file
- Commit if plan specifies
Code Comment Invocation Format:
Invoke code-commentator skill, target files: [file paths]Step Execution Rules:
- Read existing files before making modifications
- Use exact code from the plan
- Execute commands exactly as specified in the plan
- Check if actual output matches expected output
Verification Requirements:
Each task must pass its verification before moving to the next:
- Tests must pass (not just run)
- Build must succeed
- Lint must pass
- Code comments added (if needed)
Error Handling:
When errors occur:
- Record error to session state file
- Stop and seek help
Completion Criteria: All tasks executed, all tests passed, code comments added, verifications passed
Phase 3: Completion and Reporting
Goal: Generate completion report, update project context.
Actions:
- Run final verification suite
- Update session state file marking completion
- Generate completion report
- Use project-context skill to update project context
- Use project-context skill to update user profile (if new preferences identified)
Completion Report Format:
## Implementation Complete
**Plan**: [plan file path]
**Status**: ✅ All tasks completed
### Summary
[Brief description of what was built]
### Changed Files
- New: [new file list]
- Modified: [modified file list]
### Verification Results
- Tests: ✅ Passed
- Build: ✅ Succeeded
- Lint: ✅ CleanCompletion Criteria: Report generated, project context updated, user profile updated (if changed)
When to Stop and Seek Help
Immediately stop execution in the following situations:
| Situation | Action |
| Missing dependencies | Request user to install or provide |
| Tests repeatedly failing | Debug and seek guidance when stuck |
| Instructions unclear | Request clarification, don't guess |
| Critical plan defects | Return to Phase 1 for plan revision |
| Unexpected errors occur | Record error and seek help |
Stop Protocol:
- Record obstacle to session state file
- Explain what was attempted
- Pose specific questions
- Wait for guidance
Multi-Subsystem Handling
When plan contains multiple subsystems:
- Read outline file, identify number of subsystems
- Verify dependencies, order by execution sequence
- Execute each subsystem in dependency order (Phase 1 → Phase 2 → Phase 3)
- Shared components implemented in the first subsystem that uses them
Invocation by Other Skills
When invoked by writing-plan skill:
Received Parameters:
plan_path: Plan document path (required)subsystem_paths: Subsystem plan path list (required for multi-subsystem)outline_path: Outline file path (if applicable)
Skip trigger condition check, directly create session state file and proceed to Phase 1.
Reference Guide
| Reference Document | Purpose |
references/execution-state-template.md | Execution state record template |
references/completion-report-template.md | Completion report template |
FAQ
How to recover after dialogue interruption?
Handling:
- Read session state file
design/.session-state.md - Verify completed task code and tests
- Report recovery options to user
Plan needs modification?
Handling:
- Return to Phase 1 for plan review
- Discuss modification plan with user
- Re-execute after modification
Encountered obstacles?
Handling:
- Record issue to session state file
- Stop and ask user
- Don't try to force through obstacles
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

