agentleFS
superagntsuperagnt/leverage/skills/packaged/super-seo/SKILL.md

super-seo

Skill6 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

This skill should be used when the user wants to run the Super SEO skill, or asks to \"run my SEO\", \"audit my site's SEO\", \"improve my rankings\", \"build my keyword map\", \"find link targets\", \"check my AI visibility / AEO / GEO\", \"why does ChatGPT not mention us\", \"write SEO pages for keyword gaps\", \"draft pages for keywords my competitors rank for\", \"run a keyword gap and write the pages\", \"fill my content gaps\", \"what does search console say\", \"why did my clicks drop\", \"check my indexing\", or invokes a mode directly (\"seo measure\", \"seo audit\", \"seo write\", \"seo fix\", \"seo links\", \"seo ai\", \"seo report\"). A full SEO operating system, not a page generator. Runs on the superagnt MCP: Google Search Console as ground truth, plus SERP + keyword + backlink + on-page + AI-visibility data, web scrape, and the workspace database, with an optional weekly hosted run.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run the user's whole SEO practice the way a good consultant would, with one difference: every action is ranked against every other action …

    line 9
  2. Very specific:

    Every mode writes a seo_runs row.

    line 34
  3. Distinctive:

    If they are absent, say once that Search Console is not connected, that connecting it from the connections page in the superagnt app is …

    line 78
  4. Very specific:

    Ask for the user's domain, 2-3 competitor domains, and what they sell (one line: the buyer and the problem).

    line 109
  5. Distinctive:

    Run this at the top of every cycle, before anything is proposed.

    line 156
  6. Distinctive:

    Present the board: before executing: rank, action, lane, score, and the number behind it.

    line 228
  7. Very specific:

    ONLY the tools those steps use including the Search Console connection tools, agnt_agents_deploy, then agnt_schedules_create — cadence …

    line 267
  8. Distinctive:

    Never fabricate a metric — every volume, difficulty, authority, position or visibility number reported comes from a tool result or a table …

    line 288
  9. Distinctive:

    Never fabricate a Search Console number, and never present a third-party estimate as a GSC one.

    line 291
  10. Distinctive:

    When third-party data and GSC disagree, GSC wins.

    line 294
  11. Distinctive:

    Never quote a sitewide average position or a sitewide CTR.

    line 298
  12. Distinctive:

    Every action on the board carries the number that justifies it.

    line 300

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Super SEO

Run the user's whole SEO practice the way a good consultant would, with one difference: every action is ranked against every other action on one scale, and the run works top-down. Search Console is the ground truth; third-party data fills what it cannot see. Drafts, fixes and plans are the deliverable. Publishing, sending and spending stay with the user, always.

Command modes

A bare invocation ("run my SEO") is the full cycle: measure, score every candidate action, execute the top items. A mode forces one lane and skips the rest, which is what the user wants when they already know what is wrong.

ModeThe user saysWhat runs
(bare)"run my SEO", "what should I do this week"Step 2, then the ranked cycle in Step 4
measure"what does search console say", "why did my clicks drop"Step 2 only: the panel, the decomposition, a snapshot row
audit"audit my site", "check my indexing"Step 1 technical + on-page pass, no drafting
write"write pages for my gaps", "fill my content gaps"The drafting lane only, capped at 5
fix"what do I fix on this page"Re-audit the named pages, concrete fix list
links"find link targets", "who links to my competitors"Link lane only, capped at 3 pitches
ai"why does ChatGPT not mention us", "check my AEO"AI-visibility lane only
report"where are we at", "write the weekly"Read the tables, write the review, spend nothing new

Every mode writes a seo_runs row. A mode filters the candidate list; it never skips the numbers.

The research library

This skill ships with a bundled research corpus in references/, distilled from hundreds of practitioner sources (X threads, YouTube transcripts, Reddit, industry studies; researched 2026-09). Before working a lane, read the matching note; cite its findings when explaining a recommendation, and prefer it over generic SEO folklore.

  • references/00-agent-seo-playbook.md — the operating manual; read it on first run.
  • references/technical-seo.md — crawlability, indexing, rendering, schema, migrations.
  • references/on-page-and-eeat.md — titles, entities, E-E-A-T, snippet formatting.
  • references/keyword-research-and-serp.md — intent, clustering, difficulty reality, prioritization.
  • references/content-strategy-topical-authority.md — topical maps, programmatic SEO, refresh economics, SaaS plays.
  • references/link-building-white-hat.md — digital PR, linkable assets, outreach mechanics, market costs.
  • references/link-building-grey-hat.md — the paid-link and PBN market documented with risk labels. Briefing material only; see The grey zone below.
  • references/ai-search-aeo-geo.md — AI Overviews, LLM citations, brand-mention currency, measurement.
  • references/local-seo.md — GBP, reviews, citations, local packs.
  • references/seo-with-ai-agents.md — what agent automation does well and where it burns people.
  • references/measurement-algo-updates.md — GSC, testing, update recovery, the API leak takeaways. Read it before any measurement work.
  • references/new-domain-zero-to-one.md — a domain with no history: real timelines, what to publish first, the cold-start link problem, kill criteria.
  • references/international-and-non-google.md — hreflang, URL structure, localisation at scale, and the engines that are not Google (Bing matters: it grounds ChatGPT).

Installed as a raw single SKILL.md without references/ (non-plugin harness)? Say so once, then proceed: the steps below stand alone.

Step 0 — tools

agnt_tools_list_enabled; if data:seo, data:web or database families are missing, agnt_tools_enable({ "families": ["data:seo", "data:web", "database"] }). A requires_upgrade result carries a confirm_url — give it to the user and wait, then re-run. (Connecting through the super-seo skill endpoint pre-enables these.)

Then check Search Console. It is a your-credential OAuth connection, not a data family: look for tools prefixed connection_google_search_console_* in the same listing. If they are present, call connection_google_search_console_list_sites and have the user pick the property, storing the exact siteUrl string (a URL-prefix property is the full URL with trailing slash; a domain property is prefixed sc-domain:).

If they are absent, say once that Search Console is not connected, that connecting it from the connections page in the superagnt app is what unlocks the real numbers, and that you are continuing on third-party estimates until they do. Degraded is a labelled state, never a blocker: every panel, board and report produced without GSC marks the affected figures "third-party estimate".

Tool names on grouped servers

This skill writes flat (per-operation) tool names. New superagnt servers list grouped tools instead: one tool per resource with an action argument. Flat names still resolve there but are not listed, so call the grouped form:

  • data_seo_google_search / data_seo_google_ai_mode_search / data_seo_search_intent → data_seo_serp, action google / ai_mode / intent
  • data_seo_keyword_ideas / data_seo_keyword_overview / data_seo_ranked_keywords / data_seo_keyword_gap → data_seo_keywords, action ideas / overview / ranked / gap
  • data_seo_domain_overview / data_seo_competitors / data_seo_ai_visibility / data_seo_page_audit → data_seo_domains, action overview / competitors / ai_visibility / page_audit
  • data_seo_backlinks_summary / data_seo_referring_domains / data_seo_backlink_gap → data_seo_backlinks, action summary / referring_domains / gap
  • data_web_scrape keeps its name on both surfaces
  • agnt_db_apply_migration → agnt_db_sql, action apply_migration
  • agnt_agents_create / agnt_agents_deploy → agnt_agents_write, action create / deploy
  • agnt_schedules_create → agnt_schedules_write, action create
  • agnt_tools_enable → agnt_tools_write, action enable

On a grouped server every data source is already on, so skip the data:* part of Step 0 (enable any other family with agnt_tools_write, action enable). Grouped data calls return a compact markdown view: pass response_format: "json" for every view field, or "raw" for the full payload, when a step needs a field the table leaves out.

Step 1 — the baseline (first run only)

Ask for the user's domain, 2-3 competitor domains, and what they sell (one line: the buyer and the problem). Verify each domain with data_seo_domain_overview; propose extra competitors with data_seo_competitors if they only know one. Then baseline:

  • data_seo_page_audit on the homepage and 3-5 money pages.
  • data_seo_backlinks_summary + data_seo_referring_domains for the user and each competitor.
  • data_seo_ai_visibility for the user's brand and their category terms — the AI-answer baseline most founders have never seen.
  • data_web_scrape the homepage + 2 representative pages for voice notes (tone, structure, internal links) and the URL pattern.

Store everything (agnt_db_apply_migration then inserts):

  • seo_targets(id, domain, is_self boolean, active boolean default true, profile jsonb, created_at timestamptz) — profile on the self row carries voice notes, url pattern, money pages, internal link targets, and the GSC siteUrl once known.
  • seo_keywords(keyword text primary key, cluster text, volume int, difficulty int, intent text, priority int, status text default 'gap', competitor_url text, draft_md text, title text, meta_description text, updated_at timestamptz) — one row per page the user could own. status moves gap → queued → drafted → published/skipped. This is the drafting lane's state too: a draft is a seo_keywords row with draft_md filled, not a separate table.
  • seo_link_targets(domain text primary key, why text, authority int, contact text, pitch_md text, status text default 'new', updated_at timestamptz) — status moves new → pitch_drafted → won/dead.
  • seo_gsc_rows(day date, query text, page text, country text, device text, clicks int, impressions int, ctr numeric, position numeric, primary key (day, query, page, country, device)) — the GSC pull, kept row-level. Never store only the aggregate.
  • seo_snapshots(id, taken_at timestamptz, source text, metrics jsonb) — one row per cycle per source (gsc, third_party).
  • seo_runs(id, ran_at timestamptz, mode text, board jsonb, done jsonb, notes text) — what was ranked, what was executed, what was deferred and why.

Two cases change the plan first. A new domain with no ranking history: read references/new-domain-zero-to-one.md and set expectations from it, because the honest answer may be that SEO cannot pay yet. A user selling across borders: references/international-and-non-google.md covers the URL-structure call and Bing, which grounds ChatGPT.

Step 2 — the measurement panel

Run this at the top of every cycle, before anything is proposed. It is what makes the ranked board honest.

  1. Pull the rows. connection_google_search_console_query_analytics for the last 28 days and the prior 28, dimensions ["query","page"] plus a ["page","date"] pass, dataState: "all" so the freshest days are included. Page with rowLimit / startRow. Upsert into seo_gsc_rows.
  2. Decay. Pages whose clicks fell against the prior period while impressions held. Each is a refresh candidate carrying its click delta.
  3. Striking distance. Query+page pairs at position 5-15 with real impressions. Each is a fix candidate carrying its impressions and the click gap to the position above.
  4. The three-way decomposition on every material drop. Impressions flat and clicks down means CTR moved, usually a SERP feature above you. Impressions down and position flat means demand moved. Impressions down and position down means you lost ranking, and that is the only branch worth alerting on (references/measurement-algo-updates.md).
  5. Indexing. connection_google_search_console_inspect_url on the money pages and anything published since the last run; a page not indexed outranks every content idea in the board below. Add connection_google_search_console_list_sitemaps when coverage looks wrong; ..._submit_sitemap only if the user asks.
  6. Blend the third-party panels for what GSC cannot see: data_seo_ranked_keywords, data_seo_backlinks_summary, data_seo_ai_visibility (competitors, the link graph, whether AI answers cite the brand).

Insert a seo_snapshots row per source. Report per query and per page, never sitewide: a macro average position of 19.6 can decompose to 1.0 on one query and 38.5 on another, so the aggregate is not a number.

Step 3 — the keyword map

Maintained, not rebuilt. data_seo_ranked_keywords for the user, data_seo_keyword_gap per competitor, data_seo_keyword_ideas seeded from what they sell. Enrich keepers with data_seo_keyword_overview + data_seo_search_intent in batches. Cluster by topic, then priority: bottom-of-funnel intent first, winnable difficulty for this domain's strength, real buyer language over volume vanity (the reasoning lives in references/keyword-research-and-serp.md and references/content-strategy-topical-authority.md). Skip branded terms on either side. Upsert into seo_keywords.

Where GSC is connected, a query the site already gets impressions for beats an estimated-volume keyword it has never been seen for. Join the map to seo_gsc_rows before you rank it.

Step 4 — the ranked cycle

Each cycle, build ONE candidate list across every lane, score it on one scale, show it, then work top-down. This replaces the fixed-order loop: a drafting idea and a technical fix compete on the same board.

Candidates. Draft page X (from seo_keywords at gap/queued), refresh decaying page Y (Step 2.2), fix striking-distance page Z (Step 2.3), technical or indexing fix (Step 2.5 and data_seo_page_audit), pitch link target W (data_seo_backlink_gap + data_seo_referring_domains), AEO fix (data_seo_ai_visibility, data_seo_google_ai_mode_search).

Score. impact × confidence ÷ effort, each 1-5, every score carrying the tool number that justifies it. Impact is the traffic or citation at stake (GSC clicks and impressions where connected, data_seo_* estimates where not). Confidence is how sure the mechanism is: an indexing failure is a 5, an AEO tactic from a contested study is a 2. Effort is what the USER has to do, not what the agent does. Ranking logic: references/00-agent-seo-playbook.md. Technical blockers usually win on confidence alone, and that is correct.

Present the board before executing: rank, action, lane, score, and the number behind it. The user can reorder it.

Execute top-down, inside the caps. Up to 5 page drafts and up to 3 link pitches per cycle. Everything else is unlimited, because fixes are cheap and drafts are not.

  • Drafting. Scrape the page to beat (data_web_scrape), work out what it answers and what it misses, then draft the full page in the user's voice from seo_targets.profile: title, H2/H3 structure, complete body, meta description, internal links to their real pages. Beat it on completeness, never echo its sentences. Save draft_md, title, meta_description, mark drafted, present each draft with its numbers. Quality bar and information-gain rules: references/on-page-and-eeat.md.
  • Fixes. Re-run data_seo_page_audit on pages the user changed; list concrete edits with the page and the line, never "improve content".
  • Links. Qualify targets (relevance beats raw authority; the honest proxy for a link's value is whether the linking page itself ranks), then write pitch_md, a real personalized draft per target. If enrichment tools are enabled (agnt_tools_search for "email finder"), attach contacts; otherwise leave contact to the user. Outreach mechanics and realistic reply rates: references/link-building-white-hat.md. The user sends; this skill never does.
  • AEO. Track citation share against seo_snapshots; tactics for earning citations: references/ai-search-aeo-geo.md.

Close the run. Insert a seo_runs row with the board, what was executed, and what was deferred. Then report: what moved (from Step 2), what shipped, what is queued, and what needs the user (publish approvals, pitches to send, fixes to deploy).

Step 5 — offer the weekly run (a task agent)

Once one full cycle has produced work the user actually rates, offer to make it weekly by building a task agent — the full recipe is the base task-agents skill. Short form: agnt_agents_create with a system prompt carrying Steps 2-4 verbatim (tables, scoring scale, caps), add ONLY the tools those steps use including the Search Console connection tools, agnt_agents_deploy, then agnt_schedules_create — cadence confirmed with the user first; every firing is a billed run. The lifecycle and schedules families are on every plan, and plans cap agents and schedules; requires_upgrade → confirm_url → wait. If the user prefers local-only, skip this and tell them to re-run the skill whenever.

The grey zone

references/link-building-grey-hat.md documents the paid-link, niche edit, PBN and expired-domain market with real prices and risk labels, because a corpus that pretends the market does not exist cannot advise on it. Use it to BRIEF the user honestly when they ask (what it costs, what it claims to yield, how it goes wrong, labeled risk), and to recognize grey signals in their existing backlink profile. This skill never buys placements, never orchestrates a purchase, and recommends the white-hat route by default; if the user chooses a paid route, that decision and every transaction are theirs, off-platform.

Rules

  • Never fabricate a metric — every volume, difficulty, authority, position or visibility number reported comes from a tool result or a table row.
  • Never fabricate a Search Console number, and never present a third-party estimate as a GSC one. When GSC is not connected, the panel says so on every affected figure.
  • When third-party data and GSC disagree, GSC wins. It is the user's own log; everything else is somebody's model of it. Label GSC query data as a sample, not a census: the API returns top rows, and low-volume queries are withheld.
  • Never quote a sitewide average position or a sitewide CTR. Both are only meaningful filtered to one query and one page.
  • Every action on the board carries the number that justifies it. An unscored action does not get executed.
  • Drafts never copy competitor sentences; the page to beat sets the bar, the draft is original work in the user's voice.
  • This skill drafts, fixes and plans; it never publishes to the user's site, never sends outreach, and never spends money. Publish, send, spend, disavow, delete and redirect are user actions.
  • Cite the research library when recommending; say when a practice is contested rather than presenting folklore as fact.
<!-- skill_id: super-seo · source: https://github.com/superagnt/plugins -->

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.