hark
CLAUDE.md2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
A Go CLI that validates and compiles markdown changefiles (.change.md) into a unified changelog. Used across Stripe SDK repos, both as a standalone CLI and as a Go dependency. Module: github.com/stripe/hark changefile/ and releases/ are the public API — other Go code imports them, so treat their names and signatures as a compatibility surface. cmd/ is not: the CLI is not meant to be embedded, and exports only Execute. The paths hark uses are hardcoded, not configurable: .hark/releases.json, .hark/changes/*.change.md, .hark/intros/intro-<version>.md,…
The file
We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 67
Avoid stutter in the public API (releases.ReadFile, not releases.ReadVersionsFile)
- Very specific: line 71
Every function doing file I/O takes afero.Fs as a parameter for testability
- Very specific: line 73
Use testify (assert/require) for test assertions
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
hark
A Go CLI that validates and compiles markdown changefiles (.change.md) into a unified changelog. Used across Stripe SDK repos, both as a standalone CLI and as a Go dependency.
Module: github.com/stripe/hark
Quick Reference
just test # run all tests with race detector
just build # build dev binary to bin/hark
just lint # run golangci-lint
just format # gofmt -s -w .
just format-check # verify formatting (CI mode)
just prepare # format + lint + testProject Layout
changefile/ and releases/ are the public API — other Go code imports them, so treat
their names and signatures as a compatibility surface. cmd/ is not: the CLI is not
meant to be embedded, and exports only Execute.
main.go— entrypoint, version injection via ldflagscmd/— cobra commands (thin shells that parse args and delegate)changefile/— public: changefile struct, frontmatter parsing, validation, serialization, recursive/parallel reading, filename generation (Name/ValidateName)releases/— public:releases.jsonread/write, release comparison (Compare), version validity (IsVersionValid), date-orderedInsert, semver-orderPredecessors, duplicate detection (FirstDuplicate), and release channel (Channel) derived from version suffixesinternal/changelog/— high-level operations behind each CLI command (build, validate, release, new)
Fixed layout
The paths hark uses are hardcoded, not configurable: .hark/releases.json,
.hark/changes/*.change.md, .hark/intros/intro-<version>.md,
.hark/migration-guides/v<major>.md, and CHANGELOG.md at the repo root. Only
Options.Root moves them, and it has no CLI flag — it exists so a programmatic
caller holding several checkouts can work through them one at a time. Don't add
path flags.
Migration guides are the one thing under .hark/ that hark writes but never reads:
release seeds the next major's guide and the require-migration-guide action
watches the directory. So the name is a convention two places have to agree on, not
something a lookup would catch — MigrationGuideName and the action's
.hark/migration-guides/ glob have to match.
A release's intro is a file, never a field: it exists if and only if
.hark/intros/intro-<version>.md does, so nothing can record it inconsistently.
Because it is found purely by name, validate is what catches a misnamed one — but
an intro for an unreleased version is valid and ignored until that version is cut,
so intros can be drafted ahead of the release.
Changefile names ({date}_{user}_{slug}.change.md, where {date} is YYYY-MM-DD)
must lead with the date: the changelog orders changes within a release by filename,
oldest first — except that a change marked is_stripe_api_change sorts last whatever
it is named. Release dates in releases.json use that same format. The {slug} is
letters, numbers, and hyphens only (changefile.ValidateSlug) — an underscore in it
would read as a fourth segment, and a space makes the file a chore to type.
How big a change is lives in one field, semver_level. A changefile that leaves it
off is a patch, so read it through Changefile.Level() rather than the field: major
is what earns the ⚠️ in the changelog and what the migration-guide check looks for.
Conventions
- Go version: whatever
go.moddeclares (CI readsgo-version-file: go.mod) - Exported identifiers get doc comments; every package has a package comment
- Comments should be CONCISE and SPECIFIC.
- Avoid stutter in the public API (
releases.ReadFile, notreleases.ReadVersionsFile) - CLI commands only parse args and call into
internal/changelog; no business logic incmd/ - Build the command tree with a constructor instead of package-level
vars, so tests get independent trees and flag state can't leak - Operations take an
Optionsstruct carrying their dependencies (afero.Fs,io.Writer, paths) — nothing reaches for globals,os.Stdout, or the real filesystem directly - Every function doing file I/O takes
afero.Fsas a parameter for testability - Tests use
afero.NewMemMapFs()— no temp files, no cleanup - Use
testify(assert/require) for test assertions - Errors are returned, never panicked
- Validation methods return
[]errorto report all issues at once
Dependencies
| Package | Purpose |
github.com/spf13/cobra | CLI framework |
github.com/goccy/go-yaml | YAML deserialization |
github.com/spf13/afero | Filesystem abstraction (testing) |
github.com/stretchr/testify | Test assertions |
golang.org/x/sync/errgroup | Parallel file reading |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

