team-narrative
Skill118 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub
Orchestrate the narrative team: coordinates narrative-director, writer, world-builder, and level-designer to create cohesive story content, world lore, and narrative-driven level design.
11 other projects use a version of this, 9 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studiosedited, first seen Oct 19, 2026
- venus2099/codex-game-studiosedited, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- ShiningPlague/shiningplague-studiotheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- scotidev/GameDevStudioedited, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- HunLuanZhiZhu/Game-Studios-Pluginedited, first seen Oct 5, 2026
- dawn840705/claude-code-studiosedited, first seen Aug 28, 2026
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 9
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27k25% same
- CoralGame/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 1987% same
- dawn840705/codex-code-studios★ 1794% same
- lilangMax/ClaudeCodeGameStudios★ 898% same
- hongyuanc/codex-game-studios★ 554% same
- dawn840705/claude-code-studios★ 198% same
- HunLuanZhiZhu/Game-Studios-Plugin★ 186% same
- scotidev/GameDevStudio★ 187% same
- venus2099/codex-game-studios★ 125% same
Wrote their own version · 2
- pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
- ShiningPlague/shiningplague-studio★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository83 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- design/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skill-testing-framework/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- src/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .cursor/rules/ocgs-framework.mdcCursor rule
- adoptSkill
- architecture-decisionSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- art-bibleSkill
- art-generateSkill
- asset-auditSkill
- asset-specSkill
- automated-smoke-testSkill
- autopilot-playtestSkill
- balance-checkSkill
- bug-reportSkill
- bug-triageSkill
- changelogSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- concept-brainstormSkill
- consistency-checkSkill
- content-auditSkill
- create-architectureSkill
- create-control-manifestSkill
- create-epicsSkill
- create-storiesSkill
- day-one-patchSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-systemSkill
- dev-storySkill
- estimateSkill
- exploreSkill
- gate-checkSkill
- helpSkill
- hotfixSkill
- hybrid-prototypeSkill
- init-templateSkill
- launch-checklistSkill
- localizeSkill
- map-systemsSkill
- milestone-reviewSkill
- onboardSkill
- patch-notesSkill
- perf-profileSkill
- playtest-reportSkill
- project-stage-detectSkill
- propagate-design-changeSkill
- prototypeSkill
- qa-planSkill
- quick-designSkill
- regression-suiteSkill
- release-checklistSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- reverse-documentSkill
- review-all-gddsSkill
- scope-checkSkill
- security-auditSkill
- setup-engineSkill
- skill-improveSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. 11 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
11
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 8
If no argument is provided, output usage guidance and exit without spawning any agents:
- Common: line 11
When this skill is invoked with an argument, orchestrate the narrative team through a structured pipeline.
- Common: line 27
Use the Task tool to spawn each team member as a subagent:
- Common: line 35
Always provide full context in each agent's prompt (narrative brief, lore dependencies, character profiles).
- Common: line 49
world-builder: Create or update lore entries for factions, locations, and history relevant to this content.
- Common: line 57
Place narrative triggers, dialogue zones, and discovery points
- Common: line 58
Ensure pacing serves both gameplay and story
- Common: line 63
Verify lore consistency across new and existing entries
- Common: line 65
Check that all mysteries have documented "true answers"
- Common: line 75
If any spawned agent (via Task) returns BLOCKED, errors, or cannot complete:
- Distinctive: line 78
Assess dependencies: Check whether the blocked agent's output is required by subsequent phases.
- Distinctive: line 82
Stop here and resolve the blocker first
- Distinctive: line 93
All file writes (narrative docs, dialogue files, lore entries) are delegated to sub-agents spawned via Task.
- Common: line 103
If the pipeline stops because a dependency is unresolved (e.g., lore contradiction or missing prerequisite not resolved by the user):
- Very specific: line 109
Run /design-review on the narrative documents for consistency validation.
- Very specific: line 110
Run /localize extract to extract new strings for translation after dialogue is finalized.
- Very specific: line 111
Run /dev-story to implement dialogue triggers and narrative events in-engine.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
If no argument is provided, output usage guidance and exit without spawning any agents:
Usage:
/team-narrative [narrative content description]— describe the story content, scene, or narrative area to work on (e.g.,boss encounter cutscene,faction intro dialogue,tutorial narrative). Do not usequestionhere; output the guidance directly.
When this skill is invoked with an argument, orchestrate the narrative team through a structured pipeline.
Decision Points: At each phase transition, use question to present
the user with the subagent's proposals as selectable options. Write the agent's
full analysis in conversation, then capture the decision with concise labels.
The user must approve before moving to the next phase.
Team Composition
- narrative-director — Story arcs, character design, dialogue strategy, narrative vision
- writer — Dialogue writing, lore entries, item descriptions, in-game text
- world-builder — World rules, faction design, history, geography, environmental storytelling
- art-director — Character visual design, environmental visual storytelling, cutscene/cinematic tone
- level-designer — Level layouts that serve the narrative, pacing, environmental storytelling beats
How to Delegate
Use the Task tool to spawn each team member as a subagent:
subagent_type: narrative-director— Story arcs, character design, narrative visionsubagent_type: writer— Dialogue writing, lore entries, in-game textsubagent_type: world-builder— World rules, faction design, history, geographysubagent_type: art-director— Character visual profiles, environmental visual storytelling, cinematic tonesubagent_type: level-designer— Level layouts that serve the narrative, pacingsubagent_type: localization-lead— i18n validation, string key compliance, translation headroom
Always provide full context in each agent's prompt (narrative brief, lore dependencies, character profiles). Launch independent agents in parallel where the pipeline allows it (e.g., Phase 2 agents can run simultaneously).
Pipeline
Phase 1: Narrative Direction
Delegate to narrative-director:
- Define the narrative purpose of this content: what story beat does it serve?
- Identify characters involved, their motivations, and how this fits the overall arc
- Set the emotional tone and pacing targets
- Specify any lore dependencies or new lore this introduces
- Output: narrative brief with story requirements
Phase 2: World Foundation (parallel)
Delegate in parallel — issue all three Task calls simultaneously before waiting for any result:
- world-builder: Create or update lore entries for factions, locations, and history relevant to this content. Cross-reference against existing lore for contradictions. Set canon level for new entries.
- writer: Draft character dialogue using voice profiles. Ensure all lines are under 120 characters, use named placeholders for variables, and are localization-ready.
- art-director: Define character visual design direction for key characters appearing in this content (silhouette, visual archetype, distinguishing features). Specify environmental visual storytelling elements for each key space (prop composition, lighting notes, spatial arrangement). Define tone palette and cinematic direction for any cutscenes or scripted sequences.
Phase 3: Level Narrative Integration
Delegate to level-designer:
- Review the narrative brief and lore foundation
- Design environmental storytelling elements in the level
- Place narrative triggers, dialogue zones, and discovery points
- Ensure pacing serves both gameplay and story
Phase 4: Review and Consistency
Delegate to narrative-director:
- Review all dialogue against character voice profiles
- Verify lore consistency across new and existing entries
- Confirm narrative pacing aligns with level design
- Check that all mysteries have documented "true answers"
Phase 5: Polish (parallel)
Delegate in parallel:
- writer: Final self-review — verify no line exceeds dialogue box constraints, all text uses string keys (not raw strings), placeholder variable names are consistent
- localization-lead: Validate i18n compliance — check string key naming conventions, flag any strings with hardcoded formatting that won't survive translation, verify character limit headroom for languages that expand (German/Finnish typically +30%), confirm no cultural assumptions in text that would need locale-specific variants
- world-builder: Finalize canon levels for all new lore entries
Error Recovery Protocol
If any spawned agent (via Task) returns BLOCKED, errors, or cannot complete:
- Surface immediately: Report "[AgentName]: BLOCKED — [reason]" to the user before continuing to dependent phases
- Assess dependencies: Check whether the blocked agent's output is required by subsequent phases. If yes, do not proceed past that dependency point without user input.
- Offer options via question with choices:
- Skip this agent and note the gap in the final report
- Retry with narrower scope
- Stop here and resolve the blocker first
- Always produce a partial report — output whatever was completed. Never discard work because one agent blocked.
Common blockers:
- Input file missing (story not found, GDD absent) → redirect to the skill that creates it
- ADR status is Proposed → do not implement; run
/architecture-decisionfirst - Scope too large → split into two stories via
/create-stories - Conflicting instructions between ADR and story → surface the conflict, do not guess
File Write Protocol
All file writes (narrative docs, dialogue files, lore entries) are delegated to sub-agents spawned via Task. Each sub-agent enforces the "May I write to [path]?" protocol. This orchestrator does not write files directly.
Output
A summary report covering: narrative brief status, lore entries created/updated, dialogue lines written, level narrative integration points, consistency review results, and any unresolved contradictions.
Verdict: COMPLETE — narrative content delivered.
If the pipeline stops because a dependency is unresolved (e.g., lore contradiction or missing prerequisite not resolved by the user):
Verdict: BLOCKED — [reason]
Next Steps
- Run
/design-reviewon the narrative documents for consistency validation. - Run
/localize extractto extract new strings for translation after dialogue is finalized. - Run
/dev-storyto implement dialogue triggers and narrative events in-engine.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

