manga-generator
CLAUDE.md169 starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub
Read docs/CLAUDE-CODE.md before setup or production. Follow the common production procedure in docs/AUTOMATIC.md, substituting the tools described in that guide for Codex-only tools and skills. Do not assume Codex image_gen or bundled skills are available. Use the declared external renderer and actually inspect PNGs with Read. Use a real manga-reviewer subagent for independent stage reviews, passing the exact prepared request and files; never invent task IDs or observations. Preserve all common review, history, coverage and completion gates.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- manga-art-directionSkill
- manga-productionSkill
- manga-reviewSkill
The file
We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 5
Read docs/CLAUDE-CODE.md before setup or production.
- Distinctive: line 9
Read. Use a real manga-reviewer subagent for independent stage reviews, passing the exact prepared request and files.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
@AGENTS.md
Claude Code
Read docs/CLAUDE-CODE.md before setup or production. Follow the common production procedure in docs/AUTOMATIC.md, substituting the tools described in that guide for Codex-only tools and skills. Do not assume Codex image_gen or bundled skills are available. Use the declared external renderer and actually inspect PNGs with Read. Use a real manga-reviewer subagent for independent stage reviews, passing the exact prepared request and files; never invent task IDs or observations. Preserve all common review, history, coverage and completion gates.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.