executive-outreach-drafter
Skill0 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Writes the initial outreach email to a senior stakeholder the CSM has not engaged before -- going high for the first time. Calibrates register, framing, and approach to executive communication standards. Use when asked to write an email to a VP, CRO, CFO, or C-suite contact at a customer account, draft an executive outreach, compose a going-high email, engage a new senior stakeholder, or when the CSM needs to establish a relationship at a level above their primary contacts. Also triggers for questions about executive email drafting, going high strategy, senior stakeholder engagement, or first-time executive outreach.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- account-strategy-builderSkill
- account-swot-analyserSkill
- action-item-extractorSkill
- book-prioritisationSkill
- business-review-frameworkSkill
- call-summary-generatorSkill
- capacity-calculatorSkill
- career-dev-plannerSkill
- celebration-note-writerSkill
- change-management-advisorSkill
- check-in-email-drafterSkill
- churn-post-mortemSkill
- competitive-threat-assessorSkill
- contract-review-assistantSkill
- cs-investment-case-builderSkill
- cs-metrics-explainerSkill
- customer-apology-crafterSkill
- customer-sentiment-decoderSkill
- difficult-conversation-drafterSkill
- escalation-brief-writerSkill
- escalation-decision-frameworkSkill
- executive-briefing-writerSkill
- executive-engagement-playbookSkill
- expansion-opportunity-scorerSkill
- follow-up-email-writerSkill
- goal-setting-frameworkSkill
- handoff-intro-emailSkill
- internal-debrief-writerSkill
- internal-status-update-writerSkill
- interview-prep-csSkill
- manager-one-on-one-prepSkill
- manual-health-assessmentSkill
- meeting-agenda-builderSkill
- meeting-outcome-loggerSkill
- multi-threading-playbookSkill
- nps-response-analyserSkill
- objection-handlerSkill
- onboarding-plan-builderSkill
- peer-coaching-guideSkill
- pre-call-prepSkill
- presentation-personaliserSkill
- pricing-conversation-frameworkSkill
- process-audit-worksheetSkill
- qbr-action-trackerSkill
- qbr-content-assemblerSkill
- quarterly-planning-builderSkill
- re-engagement-email-writerSkill
- renewal-conversation-openerSkill
- renewal-risk-scorerSkill
- save-play-designerSkill
- stakeholder-map-builderSkill
- stakeholder-research-prepSkill
- success-plan-creatorSkill
- territory-transition-plannerSkill
- usage-pattern-interpreterSkill
- value-narrative-builderSkill
- week-plannerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 32
No more than 5 sentences total: If you need more, you are not ready for the email -- you need a meeting
- Distinctive: line 33
One clear ask or statement of purpose: Not two. Not "a few things I wanted to cover." One
- Distinctive: line 86
Follow-up plan (when to follow up, through what channel, whether to involve the champion)
- Distinctive: line 102
If the champion can make an introduction, let them.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Executive Outreach Drafter
Writes the first email to a senior stakeholder you have not engaged before. This is one of the highest-anxiety communications in CS because the stakes are real: a poorly written executive email can damage the relationship at the level that matters most, and a well-written one can unlock strategic partnership.
How to Use
Provide:
- Who you are emailing (name, title, function)
- Why you are reaching out (renewal, expansion, risk, introduction, value sharing, escalation follow-up)
- Who introduced you or how you identified them (champion referral, org chart, LinkedIn, stakeholder map)
- What you know about them (background, priorities, disposition toward your product if known)
- What you want from them (a meeting, awareness, a decision, nothing specific -- just establishing the relationship)
- Account context (ARR, health, tenure, recent events)
Executive Communication Principles
Executives receive 50-200 emails per day. Yours will get 5-10 seconds of attention before they decide to read, delegate, or delete. Every word must earn its place.
The rules:
- Subject line is everything. Specific, relevant to their priorities, under 50 characters. "[Their company] + [your company] -- [one topic]" format works. "Introduction" alone does not
- First sentence is the frame. Who you are, why you are writing, and why they should care. All in one sentence
- No more than 5 sentences total. If you need more, you are not ready for the email -- you need a meeting
- One clear ask or statement of purpose. Not two. Not "a few things I wanted to cover." One
- No jargon. Health scores, NPS, QBR, cadence -- these are CS terms. Translate to business language
- No false familiarity. "I hope this email finds you well" is filler. "I noticed your team has grown 40% this year" is specific and shows you did your homework
Approach by Context
Introduction via Champion
Best approach: Reference the champion by name and the specific reason they suggested the connection.
Example: "Hi [name], [champion name] suggested I reach out. Your team has achieved [specific outcome] using [product] this quarter, and I wanted to make sure you had visibility into the value and how we are planning to support your growth next year. I would welcome a brief conversation at your convenience -- 20 minutes would be valuable."
Proactive Value Sharing
Best approach: Lead with a specific data point that matters to their function.
CFO example: "Hi [name], I wanted to share a data point relevant to your team's investment in [product]. Your team saved an estimated [X hours/EUR/outcomes] this quarter, representing a [X]x return on the annual investment. Happy to walk through the methodology if useful -- I want to make sure this evidence is available for your planning."
VP Engineering example: "Hi [name], your engineering team's adoption of [product] has put them in the top quartile among companies your size, particularly in [specific area]. I wanted to connect to ensure we are aligned on your team's priorities for the next quarter and supporting your technical roadmap."
Pre-Renewal Engagement
Best approach: Frame as alignment, not as a sales conversation.
"Hi [name], with the renewal of [product] approaching in [timeframe], I wanted to connect to make sure we are aligned on value delivered and your priorities for the next period. [Champion name] and I have been working closely on [specific initiative] and I would welcome your perspective on what matters most for [company] going forward. Would a brief call in the next two weeks work?"
Risk or Escalation Context
Best approach: Be direct about the situation. Executives respect honesty more than spin.
"Hi [name], I want to be transparent about a situation with your team's use of [product]. [One sentence on the issue]. We have [one sentence on what has been done]. I would like to discuss this with you directly to ensure we are addressing your team's needs at the right level. Can we schedule a brief call this week?"
What Not to Do
| Mistake | Why It Fails | Better Approach |
| "I hope this email finds you well" | Filler. Signals a templated email | Jump straight to the point. No preamble |
| Long introduction of yourself and your company | They can look you up in 10 seconds. Do not spend 3 sentences on what they can find on LinkedIn | One line: your name, your role, your relationship to their team |
| Multiple asks in one email | Dilutes the message. Executives process one item per email | One ask. If you need two things, send two emails (on different days) |
| CC'ing their reports without telling them | Feels like pressure. Executives notice and resent it | If you want others in the conversation, say so: "I have included [name] as they have context on the details" |
| Being vague about why you are writing | "I wanted to connect" -- about what? They will not make time for undefined conversations | Be specific: "I wanted to discuss the Q2 renewal and how we can support your expansion plans" |
| Writing more than 5 sentences | They will not read it. Full stop | If it takes more than 5 sentences, your thinking is not clear enough yet |
Output
For each outreach, the skill produces:
- Subject line (specific, under 50 characters)
- Email body (maximum 5 sentences)
- Approach rationale (which pattern was used and why)
- What to expect (likely response, likely timeline, what to do if no response)
- Follow-up plan (when to follow up, through what channel, whether to involve the champion)
Quality Gates
- Is the email under 5 sentences? Count them. Five is the maximum, not the target. Three is better
- Does the subject line work on a phone screen? (Under 50 characters, specific to them)
- Would you respond to this email if you were in their position? Read it through their eyes. If it sounds like vendor outreach, rewrite
- Is there exactly one ask? Identify it. If you cannot state the ask in one sentence, the email is unfocused
- Is the champion or context reference specific? "I work with your team" is generic. "Tom Chen suggested I reach out after our Q1 review" is specific
- Is the email free of CS jargon? No health scores, no NPS, no QBR references, no cadence talk. Business language only
Principles
- Executives respond to relevance, not persistence. One well-crafted email beats three generic ones
- The executive's time is the scarce resource, not yours. Respect it in the email length, the specificity of the ask, and the ease of responding
- Going high is a tool, not a habit. Use it when the situation warrants executive engagement (renewal, expansion, risk, strategic alignment). Using it for routine account matters devalues the channel
- If the champion can make an introduction, let them. An intro email from someone the executive trusts converts 5x better than a cold outreach from you. Your email should support the introduction, not replace it
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

