agentleFS
stacklokstacklok/mecatl/.claude/skills/perf-mcp-interpretation/SKILL.md

perf-mcp-interpretation

Skill308 starsChanged 38 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Interpret the mecatl perf MCP server's output to diagnose latency, goroutine leaks, GC pressure, allocation churn, and memory growth in a running mecatl harness. Use when connected to the mecatl perf MCP server (the perf:// resources or the query_metric / top_cpu_functions / capture_cpu_profile / top_allocations / list_slow_turns / capture_flight_recorder tools) and investigating why mecatl is slow, leaking, or growing. Covers tool routing/cost, reading pprof rankings and runtime metrics, and the leak/contention/GC signatures. NOT for generic Go profiling or non-mecatl MCP servers.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Every histogram quantile this server returns (in perf://metrics/summary, query_metric, and gc_pause_p99_upper_bound_ns) is the upper bound …

    line 91
  2. Very specific:

    User-felt latency = TTFT vs inter-token, split: Read ttft_seconds and inter_token_max_seconds separately (the mean hides both).

    line 120
  3. Very specific:

    Read perf://runtime/summary and perf://metrics/summary.

    line 143
  4. Very specific:

    Only if you need function-level CPU attribution, spend the rate-limited top_cpu_functions / capture_cpu_profile once.

    line 147

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Interpreting mecatl perf MCP output

mecatl is a streaming agentic loop. Its time is dominated by off-CPU waiting (on the model and on tool I/O), so the usual "run a CPU profile first" instinct measures the wrong thing. Diagnose by reading cheap numeric state first, and reach for the perturbing CPU tools only with a hypothesis to confirm.

Cost discipline — what to call, in what order

  1. Start cheap, read state. perf://runtime/summary (goroutines, heap, GC, RSS, uptime) and perf://metrics/summary (latency-histogram quantiles) are free, point-in-time reads. Read them first, and re-read perf://runtime/summary a few times to see trends — a single snapshot rarely diagnoses anything.
  2. Cheap tools next. query_metric (one curated metric; omit metric_name to list names), top_allocations (heap rankings, no profiling window), list_slow_turns (per-turn timing) are all cheap and unlimited.
  3. Perturbing tools last. top_cpu_functions and capture_cpu_profile start a live CPU profile that PERTURBS the process for duration_seconds, and are rate limited to one capture per cooldown window across both tools. Call them only to confirm a hypothesis, not to explore. A rate-limit hit comes back as an isError result saying to retry — wait, do not retry-spam.
  4. Never ingest raw blobs. capture_cpu_profile (with include_raw_link) and capture_flight_recorder return a user-audience resource_link to a loopback /debug/... endpoint. That link now surfaces as a TYPED BLOCK the model can see (URI + name + description) rather than a bare URI — but the model still receives only the reduced summary, never the raw blob bytes. A human downloads the linked artifact (with go tool pprof / go tool trace); if the link is https:// the model MAY fetch it via the FetchMcpResource tool (SSRF-validated through ValidateMediaURL). The perf:// resources on this server are NOT https and stay server-readonly via ReadMcpResource. Do NOT try to read a linked raw artifact into model context; report the summary and point the user at the link (or fetch an https link only if you genuinely need its contents). If a perf tool's JSON result is large and you only need a subset of fields, filter it in memory with CallMcpWithQuery (server + tool + jq_filter) rather than narrowing the call — it runs the remote tool and applies a jq filter before the result enters context.

The MCP surface (what is actually there)

Resources (cheap, read-only, JSON):

  • perf://runtime/summary — goroutines, num_cpu, gomaxprocs, heap_allocs_total_bytes, heap_objects, total_memory_bytes, heap_object_bytes, gc_pause_count, gc_pause_p99_upper_bound_ns, rss_bytes, uptime_seconds, available[]. Note: heap_allocs_total_bytes is a cumulative COUNTER (bytes ever allocated) — a huge value (100+ GB on a long-lived process) is normal, not a leak; the leak signal is the rss_bytes / heap_object_bytes slope.
  • perf://runtime/memstats — memory-focused projection (heap_allocs_total_bytes, heap_objects, heap_object_bytes, total_memory_bytes, rss_bytes, available[]).
  • perf://metrics/summary — every curated metric reduced: histograms → count + p50/p90/p99 bucket upper bounds (seconds); counters/gauges → a scalar value. Histograms and the tool_calls_total/tokens/turns_total/turn_empty_total/ active_runs counters also carry a bounded by_role breakdown over the CLOSED engine role family main|subagent|member|parallel|usermodel|child (the main engine vs the delegation children — the axis for "which agent family is burning latency/tokens"; never a session id or agent-def name).
  • perf://pprof/{profile} — template, {profile} ∈ heap|goroutine|allocs|mutex|block; reduced top-15 functions (function, file basename, flat/cum values).

Tools (all read-only):

  • query_metric{metric_name?, quantile?, role?} — one curated metric; aggregated across all roles by default, or one role family's share with role.
  • top_cpu_functions{duration_seconds?, limit?} — perturbs, rate-limited.
  • capture_cpu_profile{duration_seconds?, limit?, include_raw_link?} — perturbs, rate-limited.
  • top_allocations{limit?} — heap top-N + total_heap_bytes.
  • list_slow_turns{threshold_ms?, limit?, cursor?, role?} — cursor-paginated, newest first; each turn carries its bounded role family.
  • capture_flight_recorder{} — size + one-line summary + user link (needs --flight-recorder).

See references/output-shapes.md for the exact field names of every tool's output (FuncStat, AllocStat, SlowTurn, MetricSummaryEntry).

Honest-precision caveat — do not over-trust the numbers

Every histogram quantile this server returns (in perf://metrics/summary, query_metric, and gc_pause_p99_upper_bound_ns) is the upper bound of the bucket the quantile rank falls in — NOT an interpolated exact quantile. The field is literally named upper_bound for this reason. Read p99 as "at worst this bucket's ceiling," not an exact value. Report it as an upper bound.

Interpreting the signatures

The full signature → diagnosis → next-step table is in references/signatures.md. Read it when you have a symptom to match. The essentials:

  • Off-CPU workload. This loop mostly waits on the model/IO, so high CPU in JSON decode/marshal, markdown render, or chunk decode is the real signal in a CPU profile — that is on-CPU work on the hot streaming path. Rank by flat (self time) for the hot leaf; use cum (includes callees) to find the responsible caller.
  • Goroutine leak. goroutines rising monotonically across successive perf://runtime/summary reads (not just spiking during a run) = a leak. Read perf://pprof/goroutine to see which functions hold the stuck goroutines; this corroborates the live goroutine watchdog.
  • Off-heap growth (the WASM-leak signature). rss_bytes climbing while heap_object_bytes / total_memory_bytes stay flat = growth off the Go heap, invisible to pprof/heap and runtime metrics. (The historical cause was the RepoMap/tree-sitter WASM tool, since removed, but the pattern still stands for any off-heap consumer.)
  • GC-driven jitter. gc_pause_p99_upper_bound_ns spikes and a rising gc_pause_count, alongside high top_allocations on the streaming/chunk-decode path, explain inter-token jitter — GC pauses land between tokens.
  • User-felt latency = TTFT vs inter-token, split. Read ttft_seconds and inter_token_max_seconds separately (the mean hides both). High ttft = slow first byte; high inter_token_max = stutter the user feels mid-stream.
  • Dispatch contention. mecatl_tool_queue_seconds (short name tool_queue_seconds) rising together with tool_duration_seconds p99 = the read-parallel / mutate-serial dispatcher is queueing: a slow mutating tool serially blocks queued mutations. Queue time without duration is just load; both together is the contention signal.
  • Tail latency. Averages lie. Use list_slow_turns to find the actual tail turns, then capture_flight_recorder right after a slow turn to hand the human a trace window covering it.

Presence vs a real zero

available[] in the runtime/memstats snapshots lists which runtime/metrics fields were actually published by this toolchain. A field absent from available[] was not measured; a field present with value 0 is a real zero. gc_pause_count is legitimately 0 before the first GC. query_metric returns an isError "not present yet" for a metric with no observations — that means no relevant activity has happened, not that the metric is broken.

Workflow

  1. Read perf://runtime/summary and perf://metrics/summary.
  2. Match the symptom against the signatures above / references/signatures.md.
  3. Confirm with the cheap tool for that signature (top_allocations, query_metric, list_slow_turns, perf://pprof/goroutine).
  4. Only if you need function-level CPU attribution, spend the rate-limited top_cpu_functions / capture_cpu_profile once.
  5. Report findings as numbers + an upper-bound caveat; point the user at any raw resource_link rather than ingesting it.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.