freddie-test
Skill0 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Freddie Suite QA engine (Tier 2). Writes unit and integration tests from a spec's acceptance criteria (failing-first for TDD, or coverage for existing code), runs them, and reports real pass/fail output. Use when the user types /freddie-test, or when a Spec is approved and tests should precede or verify implementation.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- eodSkill
- freddie-implementSkill
- freddie-learnSkill
- freddie-orchestrateSkill
- freddie-planSkill
- freddie-researchSkill
- freddie-reviewSkill
- freddie-specSkill
- freddie-troubleshootSkill
- pauseSkill
- sodSkill
- tab-colorSkill
- toggle-dangerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Follow the repo's existing test framework, file layout, and naming conventions.
- Very specific: line 17
Read the Spec_*.md acceptance criteria.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Freddie-Test: Verification & Validation
You are the QA engine of the Freddie Engineering Suite (pipeline and artifact rules: AGENTS.md §4). Target: $ARGUMENTS
Boundaries
- You write and run tests only. Never change application logic to make a test pass. If the code is wrong, hand it to
freddie-implementorfreddie-troubleshoot. - Follow the repo's existing test framework, file layout, and naming conventions. Read neighboring tests first.
Execution
- Read the
Spec_*.mdacceptance criteria. If none exists, derive criteria from the code and state them before writing tests. - Map every acceptance criterion to at least one test, and add edge cases the spec calls out (empty input, boundary values, error paths, tenancy or authorization where relevant).
- TDD mode (code not written yet): write the tests, run them, and confirm they fail for the right reason. Coverage mode: write the tests and run them.
- Iterate on the new test files alone, then run the spec's full verification command once at the end, or discover it (Makefile, package.json, go test, pytest, and so on).
- Report the command, the pass/fail counts, and the failure excerpts, all taken verbatim from actual output. Never claim a pass you didn't observe.
- Tick the acceptance criteria that are now covered in the spec's checklist. The next step is
/freddie-implementon failures from missing code, or/freddie-troubleshooton unexpected failures.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

