agentleFS
srinandansrinandan/portfolio-copilot/skills/research/SKILL.md

research

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Gathers external market and news context to inform a potential action. Read-only — never has write access to any execution capability, and never reads the user's private financial data. Use when a proposed or candidate action needs supporting evidence, or the user asks about market conditions for a specific holding.

189 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use daily-arxiv, exp-eval and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • LambenthanSkill

    daily-arxiv

    每日从 arXiv 拉取新论文,过滤相关性,auto-ingest 高优先级论文,检测 SOTA 更新

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • LambenthanSkill

    exp-eval

    实验判决门:Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • truongtv22Skill

    Problem-Solving Techniques

    Apply systematic problem-solving techniques for complexity spirals (simplification cascades), innovation blocks (collision-zone thinking), recurring patterns (meta-pattern recognition), assumption constraints (inversion exercise), scale uncertainty (scale game), and dispatch when stuck. Techniques derived from Microsoft Amplifier project patterns adapted for immediate application.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • liufeng1976Skill

    setup-ts-deep-modules

    Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

    Also in 43 projects that use this

  • skyllwtSkill

    exp-pilot-eval

    Pilot result evaluation — read pilot results, apply success criteria, update idea page (pilot_result, failure_reason if failed), generate PILOT_VERDICT_REPORT. Called by /ideate Phase 5 after /exp-pilot-run.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • skyllwtSkill

    exp-pilot-run

    Pilot experiment execution — read Pilot Spec YAML, write pilot code, run experiment(Confirm with the user before operation and require the applicant to conduct manual inspection), return results. Called by /ideate Phase 5. Does NOT modify wiki pages or judge pass/fail.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +5 more from Lambenthan
  • +1 more from skyllwt

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 169 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Not a persisted contract — transient, like Portfolio Analysis's Drift Report.

    line 59
  2. Very specific:

    If search/market-data tools don't return anything conclusive, the brief says so explicitly (confidence: low, summary states the gap) rather …

    line 75
  3. Very specific:

    At most 3 google_search calls per invocation: If 3 searches do not produce enough evidence, return the brief with confidence: low and an …

    line 92
  4. Distinctive:

    Prefer one broad search followed by at most two follow-ups scoped to named tickers, sectors, or dates from the first result.

    line 95
  5. Very specific:

    Every ResearchBrief has a research_run_id that Action Drafting can cite verbatim in supporting_research_refs

    line 114

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 169 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

research

Purpose

Gathers external market/news context — the one skill in this project with no access to the user's private data at all, by design (see Isolation, below). Output feeds Action Drafting's rationale and supporting_research_refs.

This is the named candidate skill for execution via Managed Agents API, implemented using ADK's native ManagedAgent class (see ADR-0009, which refines ADR-0005 and ADR-0007) — it was chosen specifically because it never touches sensitive data, which is what makes it safe to route through a Pre-GA sandbox in the first place. The orchestrator constructs a fresh ManagedAgent node each planning cycle, with this file's content resolved from the Agent Registry as its description — not statically configured, and not a long-lived instance reused across cycles.

Isolation

This skill has no Firestore or BigQuery access. It receives its research question as a direct input from the orchestrator — it doesn't look up what to research on its own. This is a deliberate boundary, not an oversight: it means this skill's tool surface can never grow to leak private financial data into an external call, regardless of how its prompt or reasoning evolves.

When this skill runs

  • Root planner invokes it before Action Drafting, when a candidate action would benefit from external context (market conditions, recent news for a specific ticker)
  • User asks a market-conditions question directly

Inputs

FieldSourceRequired
research_questionOrchestrator — specific tickers or a general market-conditions question, phrased as a direct question, not derived by this skill from user dataYes

Output: Research Brief

Not a persisted contract — transient, like Portfolio Analysis's Drift Report. Cited by ID from ProposedAction.supporting_research_refs (see proposed-action.schema.json), so it needs a stable identifier even though the brief itself isn't stored long-term.

FieldDescription
research_run_idStable ID, referenced by Action Drafting
summaryKey findings, in the skill's own words
sourcesWhat was consulted (titles/URLs, not reproduced content)
confidencehigh | medium | low
as_ofTimestamp — market context is time-sensitive

Failure mode: no reliable data found

If search/market-data tools don't return anything conclusive, the brief says so explicitly (confidence: low, summary states the gap) rather than presenting speculation as fact. Action Drafting is expected to reflect that uncertainty in its own rationale, not paper over it.

Tools / permissions required

  • google_search (ADK/ManagedAgent built-in, server-side) — no custom MCP server. ManagedAgent doesn't support MCP tools at all; see ADR-0009 for why this is sufficient for what this skill actually needs, not just a limitation worked around.
  • No Firestore, no BigQuery, no trade-execution tools of any kind. This is the strictest tool surface of any skill in this project.

Search budget

  • At most 3 google_search calls per invocation. If 3 searches do not produce enough evidence, return the brief with confidence: low and an explicit gap statement in summary. Do not keep querying.
  • Prefer one broad search followed by at most two follow-ups scoped to named tickers, sectors, or dates from the first result. Do not run synonym-variant queries of the same question.
  • One search per distinct sub-question. If two sub-questions can be answered by the same search, run it once.

Registry metadata

  • Registered as: projects/{project}/locations/{location}/skills/private-research
  • Skill revision: 0.1.0 (draft — not yet registered)
  • Approval scope: read:external_market_data

Acceptance criteria

  1. This skill's tool surface never includes any internal (Firestore/ BigQuery) read or write scope — enforced at the tool-list composition level, not just documented intent
  2. Inconclusive research produces confidence: low with an explicit gap statement, not a fabricated conclusion
  3. Every ResearchBrief has a research_run_id that Action Drafting can cite verbatim in supporting_research_refs
  4. The ManagedAgent node is constructed fresh each planning cycle, with description resolved from the Agent Registry at that moment — not a long-lived instance built once and reused. A revoked skill should be absent from the next cycle's construction, verified the same way as the project's other live-revocation behavior.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.