doc-writer
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use this to write or refresh a README and docs from code and intent, following the documentation standard.
20 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ayushgoel/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- k1lgor/virtual-companytheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- claude-world/director-mode-litetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- TaiMaBenJi/taima-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- redai-infra/Relaxtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- mitchdenny/hex1btheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use code-review.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions20 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 20
- microsoft/vscode-docs★ 6.7ksame name
- redai-infra/Relax★ 675same name
- microsoft/aspire.dev★ 202same name
- mitchdenny/hex1b★ 182same name
- claude-world/director-mode-lite★ 80same name
- zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw-skills★ 65same name
- nimbalyst/skills★ 28same name
- k1lgor/virtual-company★ 4same name
- dqtx760/skills-manage★ 2same name
- GeziP/doc-wiki★ 2same name
10 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- a11y-auditorSkill
- aria-annotatorSkill
- color-contrast-fixerSkill
- keyboard-nav-checkerSkill
- agent-scaffoldSkill
- prompt-engineerSkill
- migration-plannerSkill
- system-design-reviewerSkill
- tradeoff-analyzerSkill
- openapi-designerSkill
- rest-endpoint-scaffoldSkill
- cloud-resource-provisionerSkill
- index-advisorSkill
- migration-writerSkill
- query-optimizerSkill
- schema-designerSkill
- project-scaffolderSkill
- cd-deployment-builderSkill
- ci-pipeline-generatorSkill
- incident-runbook-builderSkill
- observability-instrumenterSkill
- release-automatorSkill
- changelog-generatorSkill
- doc-linterSkill
- client-perf-optimizerSkill
- component-scaffoldSkill
- code-review-coachSkill
- stakeholder-comms-writerSkill
- codebase-explorerSkill
- dependency-vuln-auditorSkill
- secret-scannerSkill
- security-headers-configurerSkill
- threat-modelerSkill
- coverage-gap-finderSkill
- load-test-designerSkill
- test-refactorerSkill
- unit-test-generatorSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 51
Be accurate, not aspirational: Document actual behavior; mark known limitations honestly.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Doc Writer
Use this to write or refresh a README and docs from code and intent, following the documentation standard.
Tech profile — Technology: any · Language: any · Stack: any · Toolchain: any · Domain: documentation (Documents any artifact or codebase; structure comes from the documentation standard.)
When to use this skill
- Writing a README for new code, a skill, or a project.
- Refreshing stale docs to match current behavior.
- Standardizing docs across a repo to a consistent shape.
When NOT to use this skill
- Generating API reference from a spec — use
documentation/api-reference-generator. - Linting existing docs only — use
documentation/doc-linter. - Writing inline docstrings — use
documentation/docstring-writer.
Prerequisites
- The subject (code, artifact, or feature) and its intent/audience.
Inputs
| Input | Required | Description |
subject | yes | What is being documented |
audience | no | Who reads it (defaults to developers) |
existing_docs | no | Current docs to refresh, if any |
Instructions
- Identify subject, audience, and purpose. What problem does it solve; who reads this and why.
- Apply the required structure from /standards/documentation.md: title + one-sentence description, What it does, Quickstart, Inputs & outputs, Customization, Limitations, Changelog link.
- Write a runnable Quickstart. Copy-pasteable; the fastest path to first value.
- Be accurate, not aspirational. Document actual behavior; mark known limitations honestly. Never describe features that don't exist.
- Cross-reference, don't duplicate. Link to standards/related artifacts instead of restating them.
- Keep it GitHub-readable. Headings, tables, short paragraphs, working relative links.
- Verify no leftover placeholders and that links resolve.
Output
A complete README.md (and any requested companion docs) matching the documentation
standard's required sections, accurate to current behavior, with working links.
Constraints & safety
- One-sentence
description(/standards/naming.md). - No invented behavior; no stale claims.
- No secrets in examples (/standards/security.md).
Examples
Minimal below; full examples in EXAMPLES.md.
Given: an undocumented utility library. Produces: a README with a one-line description, a 3-step quickstart, inputs/outputs, customization, and honest limitations.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

