agentleFS
soophoosoophoo/skills/land/SKILL.md

land

Skill0 starsChanged 43 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Take an open pull request from "opened" to "merged and closed out". Watches the CI and fixes what fails (reproduced locally, regression test first), triages every human review comment into fix / reply / question and drafts the answers, pushes and posts only after the user approves, merges only when the user explicitly asks and the PR is green and approved, after syncing with the base and renumbering colliding ADRs/lessons, commits the close-out on the branch just before the merge — build plan marked shipped, success check scheduled from the brief, lessons drawn from what reviewers caught — then removes the feature's worktree and branch. Use after `ship` has opened a PR, when CI fails on a PR, when review comments come in, or whenever the user says "land", "suis la PR", "la CI est rouge", "traite les commentaires de la PR", "merge it", "on peut merger", or "close out the feature".

  • Commits and pushes

25 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use drift-audit and code-review.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • mr-fumanchuSkill

    drift-audit

    Audit a project's CLAUDE.md against its memory files to find duplicated or drifting rules, then consolidate them into a single source of truth. Use when Tony says "drift audit", "check for drift", "audit memory vs CLAUDE.md", "find duplicated rules", "clean up memory duplication", or wants to reconcile CLAUDE.md and memory so a rule never lives in two places. Read-only by default; never edits or deletes anything without explicit approval.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    code-review

    Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 23 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 23 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.