agentleFS
solo-istsolo-ist/prose/.agents/skills/roadmap-refinement/SKILL.md

roadmap-refinement

Skill8 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Audit open issues and project board. Flags done-but-open issues, board drift, and stale items for bulk cleanup.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    No arguments. Operates on solo-ist/prose and the Prose Roadmap project (project #5).

    line 16
  2. Very specific:

    Use --jq for data extraction instead of piping to external processors (e.g., python3, jq).

    line 30
  3. Distinctive:

    Wait for the user to review the report.

    line 96
  4. Very specific:

    Important: Use individual parallel Bash calls for batch operations — never for loops.

    line 98
  5. Distinctive:

    If the board needs a new status column or option changes, tell the user to do it manually in the GitHub UI.

    line 138
  6. Distinctive:

    Board is source of truth for priority: If an issue isn't on the board, it's not prioritized.

    line 149
  7. Distinctive:

    Never mutate field definitions: Only move items between existing columns.

    line 151

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Roadmap Refinement

Audit the backlog and project board, then present findings for approval before making changes.

Usage

/roadmap-refinement

No arguments. Operates on solo-ist/prose and the Prose Roadmap project (project #5).

Workflow

1. Gather State

Fetch all data in parallel using gh CLI:

gh issue list --repo solo-ist/prose --state open --limit 200 --json number,title,labels,updatedAt,createdAt,comments,body,milestone
gh pr list --repo solo-ist/prose --state all --limit 200 --json number,title,state,mergedAt,body,headRefName,closedAt
gh project item-list 5 --owner solo-ist --format json --limit 500

Use --jq for data extraction instead of piping to external processors (e.g., python3, jq). This keeps each command as a single gh invocation that matches the Bash allowlist:

gh project item-list 5 --owner solo-ist --format json --limit 500 --jq '.items[] | "\(.content.number)\t\(.id)\t\(.status)\t\(.content.type)\t\(.content.title)"'

Important: gh project item-list returns ALL items regardless of issue state — the GitHub Projects UI is:open filter is view-only and not applied by the API. After fetching, build an open issues set from the issues list and use it to distinguish open vs closed board items throughout the analysis.

2. Cross-Reference: Done but Open

For each open issue, check if it's likely completed:

  • Linked merged PRs: Issue referenced in a merged PR's body or commit messages
  • Closed branches: An issue-<number>-* branch exists but the issue is open
  • Stale "In Progress": On the board as In Progress but no activity in 30+ days

Flag these as candidates for closing. Do NOT close automatically.

3. Board Drift

Compare open issues against the project board:

  • Missing from board: Open issues not tracked in the project
  • No status: Items on the board with null/empty status
  • Closed but on board: Issues closed but still showing as active on the board
  • Superseded: Issues whose work has been absorbed by other issues

4. Staleness Check

Flag issues with no activity (comments, commits, PR references) in 60+ days. These may need:

  • Closing as stale
  • Re-prioritization
  • A comment to confirm still relevant

5. Present Findings

Output a structured report:

## Backlog Audit

### Ready to Close (done but still open)
| # | Title | Evidence | Suggested Note |
|---|-------|----------|----------------|
| 42 | Fix login | PR #50 merged | Done — fixed in #50 |

### Board Drift
| Issue | Problem | Action |
|-------|---------|--------|
| #55 | Missing from board | Add to [column] |
| #60 | Status is null | Set to [column] |

### Stale (60+ days inactive)
| # | Title | Last Activity | Recommendation |
|---|-------|---------------|----------------|
| 30 | Old feature | 2025-10-01 | Close or re-prioritize |

### Summary
- X issues ready to close
- X board items need status updates
- X stale issues to review

6. Execute on Approval

Wait for the user to review the report. Then use only safe operations.

Important: Use individual parallel Bash calls for batch operations — never for loops. Loops are shell constructs that don't match the Bash allowlist and force manual approval on every invocation. Individual calls auto-approve and run concurrently (faster too).

Closing issues:

gh issue close <NUMBER> --repo solo-ist/prose --comment "..."

Removing closed items from board:

gh project item-delete 5 --owner solo-ist --id <ITEM_ID>

Moving items between columns:

gh project item-edit --project-id <PROJECT_ID> --id <ITEM_ID> --field-id <STATUS_FIELD_ID> --single-select-option-id <OPTION_ID>

Adding issues to the board:

gh project item-add 5 --owner solo-ist --url <ISSUE_URL>

Board Columns

Current status options on the Prose Roadmap board:

ColumnPurpose
User RequestedFeature requests from users — needs triage
Do FirstHighest priority — work on these now
In ProgressActively being worked on by a human or agent
Do NextNext up after current work completes
LaterBacklog — not yet prioritized
Quick WinsLow effort, high value — ship alongside bigger work
On HoldBlocked or paused

Dangerous Operations — DO NOT USE

NEVER use updateProjectV2Field to modify single-select field options. This GraphQL mutation replaces option IDs, which silently disconnects every board item from its status — effectively wiping the entire board. This has happened before and required manual recovery.

If the board needs a new status column or option changes, tell the user to do it manually in the GitHub UI.

Safe operations are limited to:

  • gh project item-edit — move items between existing columns
  • gh project item-delete — remove items from the board
  • gh project item-add — add items to the board

Key Principles

  • Never close issues without approval. Present, don't act.
  • Evidence over assumptions. Link to the merged PR or commit that completed the work.
  • Board is source of truth for priority. If an issue isn't on the board, it's not prioritized.
  • Stale != irrelevant. Flag staleness, but let the user decide disposition.
  • Never mutate field definitions. Only move items between existing columns.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.