weekly-roundup
Skill11 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Draft the weekly AI Capability Reference roundup post for LinkedIn. Use this skill when it is time to write the Tuesday roundup, when the user says "draft the roundup," "Tuesday post," "what changed this week," or asks for a LinkedIn post summarizing recent capability reference updates. Also trigger when the user asks to log a published roundup or review the roundup cadence. This skill reads scan results, selects the right template, drafts a Post Protocol-compliant post, and logs publication to LocalBrain.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Gidntsquia/claude-configtheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Gidntsquia/claude-config★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- docs/llms.txtllms.txt
- capability-auditSkill
- capability-scannerSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. About 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈13
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 30
Read scan results and identify what changed this week.
- Very specific: line 47
If that skill is available, defer to its voice reference and compliance check.
- Distinctive: line 65
If no structured source is available, ask the user: "What changed in the capability reference this week?" Do not draft without changes.
- Distinctive: line 68
If nothing changed, say so.
- Very specific: line 74
Read references/roundup-templates.md.
- Distinctive: line 78
Pattern-focused: Use when the week's changes reveal a trend or pattern across platforms (e.g., multiple providers expanding free tiers, or …
- Distinctive: line 81
Shortest-viable: Use when the user signals low energy, when changes are minor, or when there are fewer than 2 notable changes.
- Distinctive: line 98
Follow these rules in order:
- Very specific: line 100
Read the linkedin-post skill's voice reference if available.
- Distinctive: line 115
Not every element needs to be explicit.
- Distinctive: line 137
Run this check on the selected draft before delivering.
- Distinctive: line 146
No bold, no italics
- Distinctive: line 150
No hype or guru language
- Distinctive: line 151
No influencer patterns ("Here are 7 things...")
- Very specific: line 165
After the user confirms the post has been published, log it to LocalBrain using the log_published tool:
- Distinctive: line 174
If LocalBrain is not available, append to the daily note instead.
- Distinctive: line 176
If neither is available, remind the user to log it manually.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Weekly Roundup Skill
Purpose
Automate the Tuesday LinkedIn roundup for the AI Capability Reference. This skill handles four jobs:
- Read scan results and identify what changed this week.
- Select the right post template based on the week's changes.
- Draft a Post Protocol-compliant LinkedIn post.
- Log publication to LocalBrain after posting.
Dependencies
This skill depends on two reference files. Read both before drafting.
references/post-protocol-extract.md-- the subset of the Post Protocol that governs this post slot (lane, packaging order, compliance rules, measurement).references/roundup-templates.md-- the three roundup templates with selection criteria and a worked example.
The shared LinkedIn voice profile lives in the linkedin-post skill.
If that skill is available, defer to its voice reference and compliance
check. If not, references/post-protocol-extract.md contains the
minimum rules needed to draft compliantly.
Workflow
Step 1: Gather changes
Identify what changed since the last roundup. Sources, in priority order:
- GitHub issues closed since last Tuesday (label: scanner, verification,
or manual). Use
gh issue list --state closed --since <date>if available, or ask the user. - Git log of commits to
data/since last Tuesday. - User's verbal summary of what they updated.
If no structured source is available, ask the user: "What changed in the capability reference this week?" Do not draft without changes.
If nothing changed, say so. A week with no changes means no roundup post. Do not invent content.
Step 2: Select template
Read references/roundup-templates.md. Three templates exist:
- Changes-first (default): Use when there are 2+ concrete platform changes to report. Leads with specifics.
- Pattern-focused: Use when the week's changes reveal a trend or pattern across platforms (e.g., multiple providers expanding free tiers, or a wave of GA promotions). Leads with the tension.
- Shortest-viable: Use when the user signals low energy, when changes are minor, or when there are fewer than 2 notable changes. Keeps the streak alive.
Selection rules:
- 3+ notable changes across 2+ platforms --> changes-first
- 2+ changes that share a pattern --> pattern-focused
- 1 change or minor updates only --> shortest-viable
- User says "keep it short" or similar --> shortest-viable
Present the selection and rationale before drafting. The user may override.
Step 3: Draft the post
Follow these rules in order:
- Read the linkedin-post skill's voice reference if available.
Otherwise read
references/post-protocol-extract.md. - Apply the selected template from
references/roundup-templates.md. - The post must fit the Bridge lane (AI onramps for humans, practical enablement).
Apply packaging order: a. Expensive failure (what goes wrong if you miss this) b. Human behavior under pressure (how trainers/buyers get burned) c. Instrument (the tracker as the verification tool) d. Smallest fix (bookmark it, check before your next session)
Not every element needs to be explicit. The packaging order is a bias, not a checklist. The changes-first template naturally foregrounds the instrument. The pattern-focused template naturally foregrounds the expensive failure.
- The capability reference link goes at the end of the post, inline. Never in comments.
- Hashtags: exactly 2. Default: #AIStrategy #FutureOfWork. Swap one if the week's changes strongly fit a different lane (e.g., #AIGovernance for policy-relevant changes).
- CTA: one only. For changes-first and shortest-viable, the link is the CTA. For pattern-focused, a precise question is acceptable as an alternative.
Present 2 draft options using the selected template but with different hook angles. The user picks one.
Step 4: Compliance check
Run this check on the selected draft before delivering. If the linkedin-post skill is available, use its full compliance check instead.
Checks (fail if any violated):
- Plaintext only (no markdown emphasis)
- No em dashes
- No emoji
- No bold, no italics
- Paragraphs scannable (1-3 sentences each)
- First 2 lines work as standalone preview above the fold
- One primary signal
- No hype or guru language
- No influencer patterns ("Here are 7 things...")
- Link at end of post, inline
- Hashtags at end, 2 only
- Character count 900-1,300
- CTA is not needy
- Lane is Bridge
- Packaging order is present as bias
Report: "Compliance: pass" or list violations and fix them before delivering.
Step 5: Log publication
After the user confirms the post has been published, log it to
LocalBrain using the log_published tool:
- title: "AI Capability Reference Weekly Roundup - [date]"
- channel: linkedin
- company: paice
- content_type: promo
- description: One-line summary of what the post covered
If LocalBrain is not available, append to the daily note instead.
If neither is available, remind the user to log it manually.
Quick Reference
| Item | Value |
| Post slot | Tuesday 10 AM MT |
| Lane | Bridge |
| Hashtags | #AIStrategy #FutureOfWork |
| Character target | 900-1,300 |
| Link placement | End of post, inline |
| Templates | changes-first, pattern-focused, shortest-viable |
| Scan cadence | Monday evening, Thursday evening |
| Log tool | localbrain:log_published |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

