code-spice
AGENTS.md0 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
This project uses bd (beads) for issue tracking. Run bd onboard to get started. Run the consolidated validation script: Or validate individual items manually: Each skill lives in skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md with YAML frontmatter: Under 150 lines per SKILL.md. Focus on content that changes Claude's behavior — decision tables, checklists, severity frameworks, and operational protocols. See docs/skill-content-guide.md for content philosophy. The description field in frontmatter controls when Claude loads the skill. Include terms matching what users discuss during each Line Cook phase:
- Commits and pushes
Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.
Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,774 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- code-antipatternsSkill
- code-namingSkill
- code-plan-auditSkill
- code-pruningSkill
- code-quality-foundationsSkill
- code-readabilitySkill
- code-reviewSkill
- code-scope-boundariesSkill
- code-testing-qualitySkill
- code-yagniSkill
- error-handling-patternsSkill
- refactoring-patternsSkill
- software-tradeoffsSkill
The file
We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
Implement: Follow TDD — write test, make it pass, refactor
- Distinctive: line 20
Verify: Run smoke tests (see below), check skill activates correctly
- Distinctive: line 26
Run the consolidated validation script:
- Distinctive: line 79
Avoid: prose explanations, before/after code examples, textbook knowledge, language conventions
- Distinctive: line 107
File issues for remaining work: - Create issues for anything that needs follow-up
- Distinctive: line 118
Verify: - All changes committed AND pushed
- Distinctive: line 123
NEVER stop before pushing - that leaves work stranded locally
- Distinctive: line 124
NEVER say "ready to push when you are" - YOU must push
- Distinctive: line 125
If push fails, resolve and retry until it succeeds
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Agent Instructions
This project uses bd (beads) for issue tracking. Run bd onboard to get started.
Quick Reference
bd ready # Find available work
bd show <id> # View issue details
bd update <id> --status in_progress # Claim work
bd close <id> # Complete work
bd sync # Sync with gitDevelopment Workflow
- Find work:
bd readyto see unblocked tasks - Claim it:
bd update <id> --status in_progress - Implement: Follow TDD — write test, make it pass, refactor
- Verify: Run smoke tests (see below), check skill activates correctly
- Close:
bd close <id>with semantic context comment - Push:
bd sync && git push
Smoke Testing
Run the consolidated validation script:
bash tests/smoke/validate.shOr validate individual items manually:
# Plugin structure
test -f .claude-plugin/plugin.json && echo "OK: plugin.json exists"
python3 -c "import json; json.load(open('.claude-plugin/plugin.json'))" && echo "OK: valid JSON"
# Skill validation (replace <skill-name>)
test -f skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md && echo "OK: SKILL.md exists"
head -1 skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md | grep -q "^---" && echo "OK: has frontmatter"Local Development Install
/plugin marketplace add /home/sam/code/code-spiceSkill Authoring Conventions
File Structure
Each skill lives in skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md with YAML frontmatter:
---
name: <skill-name>
description: <keyword-rich description that triggers activation during Line Cook phases>
---Naming
- Prefix skill directories with
code-(e.g.,code-readability,code-antipatterns) - Exceptions:
software-tradeoffs,refactoring-patterns, anderror-handling-patternsuse their domain name directly
Size Target
Under 150 lines per SKILL.md. Focus on content that changes Claude's behavior — decision tables, checklists, severity frameworks, and operational protocols. See docs/skill-content-guide.md for content philosophy.
Content Patterns
- Decision tables and checklists as primary content (token-efficient behavioral anchors)
- Severity classifications for consistent output across sessions
- Empirical data with sources (statistics Claude won't cite unprompted)
- Operational protocols with named stages (e.g., SCARF)
- Current tool knowledge that may post-date training cutoff
- Avoid: prose explanations, before/after code examples, textbook knowledge, language conventions
Keyword Activation
The description field in frontmatter controls when Claude loads the skill. Include terms matching what users discuss during each Line Cook phase:
| Phase | Example Keywords |
/brainstorm | quality, tradeoffs, design decisions |
/scope | readability, naming, error handling, antipatterns |
/cook | refactoring, testing, implementation |
/plan-audit | antipatterns, plan quality, audit |
/serve | code review, feedback |
Command Authoring
Commands live in commands/<name>.md with YAML frontmatter specifying name, description, and allowed-tools. They provide interactive workflows that reference skill knowledge.
Agent Authoring
Agents live in agents/<name>.md with YAML frontmatter specifying name, description, and tools. Agents act as subagents during Line Cook phases (e.g., /line:serve).
Landing the Plane (Session Completion)
When ending a work session, you MUST complete ALL steps below. Work is NOT complete until git push succeeds.
MANDATORY WORKFLOW:
- File issues for remaining work - Create issues for anything that needs follow-up
- Run quality gates (if code changed) - Tests, linters, builds
- Update issue status - Close finished work, update in-progress items
- PUSH TO REMOTE - This is MANDATORY:
git pull --rebase bd sync git push git status # MUST show "up to date with origin" - Clean up - Clear stashes, prune remote branches
- Verify - All changes committed AND pushed
- Hand off - Provide context for next session
CRITICAL RULES:
- Work is NOT complete until
git pushsucceeds - NEVER stop before pushing - that leaves work stranded locally
- NEVER say "ready to push when you are" - YOU must push
- If push fails, resolve and retry until it succeeds
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

